|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Middle
East : Turkey
Serious water shortage in Turkey
By Sinan Ikinci
22 August 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Ankara, Turkeys capital and home to more than 4.5 million
people, has been in the grips of a serious water shortage for
the last three weeks.
On August 1, the director general of the State Hydraulic Works
(DSI) announced that Ankara had enough water for just 78 days
and that the water level in the citys reservoirs had fallen
to 5.5 percent of capacity, down from last years 23 percent.
At the time of writing, the level in the reservoirs is a meagre
3.5 percent of capacity, which corresponds to a water supply of
fewer than two months.
On August 2, the citys mayor, Melih Gokcek, announced
that Ankara would be divided into two sections and each section
would alternately receive water for two days for a certain period
of time. The last time water cuts occurred in Ankara was in 1992.
However, Gokceks scheme didnt work as planned.
Water cuts at two-day intervals turned into a nightmare for some
districts with three-day, four-day and even longer water cuts.
Even worse, on August 4 and 6, some parts of the city suffered
badly from flooding due to the bursting of water mains. As a result,
a number of spontaneous mass protests erupted.
After the water main bursting, the municipality announced that
water could not be supplied to the entire city for a period of
three days. As a result, a health crisis developed. Due to the
water shortage, some hospitals stopped admitting patients except
for urgent cases, while some delayed non-vital surgical operations.
Moreover, the water shortage increased the risk of disease. According
to health experts, the pressure shifts in the pipes adversely
affect the quality of the water. Also, some people, particularly
those living in poorer districts of the city, drank water taken
from artificial ponds and fountains.
The water shortage in the capital city caused international
embarrassment for the national Justice and Development Party (AKP)
government: some foreign embassies were forced to rent hotel rooms,
while others postponed official functions.
Last week, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan directly intervened
and summoned Mayor Gokcek, a member of the same AKP, to demand
an explanation, acknowledging that the partys public image
was seriously damaged due to this crisis. After the meeting, Erdogan
told the press that Gokcek realised his mistake. Gokcek
echoed his leader: I have committed a mistake by cutting
the water supply, which created an atmosphere of chaos.
On August 19, Gokcek organised a press conference and announced
that water cuts in the capital will come to an end.
He justified this decision by saying that figures indicated
a decline in Ankaras water consumption.
The decision by Gokcek and his local government is an admission
that they are incapable of implementing water rationing in an
orderly fashion. This is mainly due to the poor condition and
maintenance of the pipeline system. Following Erdogans intervention,
AKP leaders decided to take a gamble and wait for heavy autumn
rains to occur, as it is not possible to bring additional water
to Ankara before December.
However, the Turkish Meteorology Department (DMI) recently
declared, Even if seasonal rains arrive on time, a lengthy
period of time is needed before we will see the positive impact
of such rainfall. DMI added: Temperatures all across
Turkey will be two to four degrees higher than average in the
period between August and October. This means that evaporation
of existing water stocks will continue unabated.
Not just a problem of incompetence
While the Islamist media has been trying to excuse the local
government and Gokcek, the mainstream bourgeois media accused
him of neglect and bad management, particularly for allowing unhindered
water consumption until after the national elections.
Clearly, the need to avoid taking such an unpopular step as
cutting water consumption was bound up with the electoral ambitions
of the AKP (which ended up winning 47.5 percent of the vote in
Ankara in the July 22 balloting, compared to 38.1 percent in 2002).
But it would be too simplistic to reduce the problem merely to
that.
Several newspapers recently revealed that Ankara, like all
other Turkish cities, lacks needed financial resources. According
to these news reports, the State Hydraulic Works officially warned
the municipality in June 2004 and pointed to the need for a project
(bringing water from Gerede) to prevent a possible water shortage.
Gokcek officially responded to this warning by saying that the
municipalitys priority was to complete the subway system.
The daily newspaper Hurriyet quoted him as saying, We
will not be able to be involved in the financing of the water
supply project because we must secure our financial resources
for the priority project. It is deemed appropriate by our municipality
that the [Gerede] project be fully covered by the resources of
DSI.
Although Gokcek deliberately sacrificed this vital water supply
project, the construction of the Ankara subway (none of Turkeys
major cities, including Istanbul, home to more than 12 million
people, has a proper subway system) has been progressing very
slowly due to lack of money. In return, the DSI refused to invest
in the Gerede project.
The principal reason for the latter decision was the current
International Monetary Fund programme that requires the government
to run an annual budget surplus of at least 6.5 percent of GDP.
This austerity measure sucks up all the resources of the Turkish
economy in the name of debt servicing. Reaching the 6.5 percent
target has only been possible through severely squeezing public
expenditures, including investments on infrastructure by local
governments.
For the same reason, Istanbul and neighbouring cities, which
are predicted to be the site of a major earthquake some time in
the next quarter-century, are only investing a fraction of what
is needed to minimize the effects of this potential disaster.
Turkish Meteorology Department Director General Adnan Unal commented
cynically that Turks must learn to live with drought just
as they are living with the risk of an earthquake.
The water crisis in Ankara revealed the true colours of the
Islamist AKP. On several occasions, Ankara Mayor Gokcek made comments
attributing the water shortage in the capital to the will
of God. During his first press conference on the issue,
the mayor recommended that Ankara residents pray for rain and
added, We didnt presume that God would allow such
a disaster.... God knows everything. If He wills, we will have
an end to it. God willing, this disaster may end within a day.
He repeated his call for the population to pray for rain during
a subsequent press conference: We are bringing water. But
if God doesnt will it, the water sources go dry. So I call
on all to pray for rain.
To escape any responsibility for the situation, Gokcek blamed
the water shortage on global warming, an external factor entirely
beyond his control; but for him this is also something decided
by the Almighty.
When asked by a correspondent from channel NTV, the mayor of
Istanbul, Kadir Topbas (AKP), also supported calls for special
prayers in Ankara as well as in Istanbul and wherever necessary:
In times of trouble, our people seek Allahs help for
problems that they cannot solve. This is natural.
In addition to revealing his reactionary ideology, Gokceks
attitude has also been arrogant and aggressive. Again in front
of the cameras, he advised Ankaras residents to take an
extended leave and go visit their relatives or take a holiday.
If 50-60,000 of Ankara residents go and live together with
their families elsewhere we will not be compelled to start providing
water in three- or four-day intervals.
Gokcek also accused the various health institutions and experts
of exaggerating the situation for ideological purposesthis
is typical of Islamist politicians when they face difficulties.
He denounced the protests against the water situation as a conspiracy
and a few days ago sought to explain the burst water mains by
sabotage.
Other cities face the same problems
Although the water shortage has already reached a crisis level
in Ankara, the situation also looks bleak in other cities.
In general, Turkey has been experiencing a dramatic decline
in the level of its fresh-water supply. The newspapers are full
of pictures of arid, cracked soil, accompanied by gloomy reports
of the drying up of a river, lake or reservoir.
Reservoir levels in Istanbul averaged 31.8 percent of capacity
on August 1, then plummeted to 23.3 percent within the space of
20 days. Experts point out that evaporation in the citys
water supply due to high temperatures immensely contributes to
this problem. DMI officials said that if there was not rain soon,
Istanbul too would face a serious shortage of drinking water.
The third most populous city in Turkey, Izmir, seems in a better
position at the moment, with 190-200 days of water supplies on
hand. But Izmir could face a serious water shortage next year
if sufficient rainfall does not occur during the coming rainy
season.
The same applies to other cities on the Aegean coast, as well
as the Thrace region; Konya, known as the countrys bread
basket; the city of Bursa; and the Cukurova valley, which
is rich with cotton and wheat.
Water shortages have already taken their toll on agricultural
production across the country. Millions of farmers have been adversely
affected by the austerity measures of the IMF economic programme
and several World Bank projects targeting the sector. The media
is full of reports about water shortages adversely affecting the
production of wheat, olives and olive oil, figs, grapes, sunflowers
and sunflower oil, and cotton.
As a result, food prices may increase substantially in the
near future, and this might put additional pressure on the Central
Bank and its efforts to reduce inflation. No doubt, it would have
a negative impact on Turkeys foreign trade balance and current
account deficit as well.
The water shortages are also affecting the generation of electricity
in the country. Officials and experts recently voiced their concerns
about the performance of hydroelectric power plants should water
levels fail to rise next year.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |