|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : Canada
Canadian military spies on liberal war-critic
By Graham Beverley
10 August 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The Ottawa Citizen revealed last month that the Department
of National Defensei.e., Canadas militaryhad
compiled an extensive file on the activities of Steven Staples,
head of the little-known Rideau Institute for International Affairs.
The file was focused on Stapless criticisms of the Canadian
Armed Forces mission in Afghanistan, particularly his views
on ...General Hilliers plans to move the military
away from peacekeeping and into more combat-oriented roles.
Twenty-five hundred CAF personnel are currently deployed to Afghanistan,
primarily Kandahar Province, where they are playing a leading
role in the counter-insurgency campaign aimed at propping up the
US-installed government of Hamid Karzai.
The militarys file on Staples consisted of a report on
a presentation he made to the Halifax Peace Coalition as well
as email correspondence on press and popular reaction. It covered
the 15-day period in which he traveled to Nova Scotia to speak
at various anti-war events. The file was forwarded to more than
50 military officers, including two brigadier generals.
Initially, the Department of National Defense denied that the
military was monitoring Staples, even the existence of the file
in question. But under pressure from the Freedom of Information
Commissioner, the military was forced to admit that it had been
carrying out surveillance of Staples. The release of the file
was accompanied by a statement from Deputy Minister of Defense
Ward Elcock asserting that the organization understands
the importance of providing information to the public.
The militarys attempted cover-up of its monitoring of
Staples and the relative obscurity of the target strongly suggest
that this is but the tip of the icebergthat the military
is conducting widespread, if not systematic, surveillance of the
anti-war movement. The Deputy Minister of Defense who, after the
military was caught out in its lie, hastened to reassure the public
as to the militarys support for public scrutiny of its activities
is himself a former head of Canadas domestic spy agency,
the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS).
The Department of National Defense has defended its actions,
saying, Everyone engaged with communicating on Afghanistan
should be made aware of [Stapless] arguments so that they
can be better prepared to deal with them.
The claim that the military must spy on opponents of the war
so as to be able to answer their arguments could be used to justify
surveillance of any anti-war meeting or demonstration.
It also flouts the basic bourgeois democratic principle of
the subordination of the military to the civilian government.
It is the governments right and responsibilityin this
case the minority Conservative government of Stephen Harperto
answer public criticism of Canadas leading role in the Afghan
war and to explain and justify the actions of the CAF. The military,
meanwhile, is supposed to stay clear of political debates over
how and towards what ends it is deployed.
However, with the support of the previous Liberal government
of Paul Martin and the current regime, the military has begun
to assume a much more prominent political role, both at home and
abroad. Recently the World Socialist Web Site reported
on the role the head of the CAF, General Rick Hillier, played
in negotiating an agreement with the Afghan government giving
Canadian government personnel, most of them CAF officers, a prominent
role in advising the Afghan government (see The
Canadian Ministers of Hamid Karzais Afghan government).
The frequency with which Hillier has publicly dissented from the
views of the Defense Minister Gordon OConnor has caused
considerable comment in the corporate media.
The militarys attempt to explain away its surveillance
of Staples as part of a public relations initiative aimed at keeping
the public better apprised of the aims of the Afghan mission is
an obvious lie. But it certainly does represent a further CAF
foray into politics.
Staples and the Rideau Institute for International Affairs
focus on the minutiae of parliamentary politics. They often suggest
changes in motions by the Liberals to make them palatable to the
social-democratic NDP, in the hopes of uniting the opposition
to the Conservatives, so that they can rein in the militaristic
prime minister and reestablish Canada as a peace-keeping
nation. That the military is monitoring the leaders of a group
whose activities are so benign, revolving as they do around the
political establishment, underscores its sensitivity to and fear
of the widespread and deepening popular anti-war sentiment and
raises the question, Whom else is the military monitoring?
The militarys monitoring of Staples is in accordance
with the Conservative governments attempt to paint any criticisms
of its conduct of the Afghan war as disloyal, if not semi-treasonous.
Although it was the Liberals who initiated the current Afghan
mission, Harper has accused them of being pro-Taliban and even
told parliament Liberal leader Stephane Dions criticism
of the Defense Minister did not merit a reply, because Dion unlike,
OConnor, never served in the CAF.
The case of the military file on Steven Staples shows (as do
the horrors inflicted upon Maher Arar, the security certificate
debacle, and the continued assault on democratic rights) that
the rapacious interests of the Canadian ruling elite are increasingly
incompatible with the maintenance of basic democratic norms.
See Also:
Six more Canadian soldiers
killed in Afghanistan
[6 July 2007]
The Canadian Ministers
of Hamid Karzais Afghan government
[4 July 2007]
Canadas Supreme Court
authorizes secret trials and arbitrary, indefinite detention
[12 May 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |