|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
New Somare government formed in PNG despite Australian interference
By Will Marshall
18 August 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Papua New Guinea Prime Minister Michael Somare was re-elected
on Monday for a second successive term with the support of 86
of the 109 MPs in the PNG parliament. Somares party, the
National Alliance, won 27 seats and formed alliances with various
independents and 13 minor parties to establish the largest governing
coalition since the country became independent in 1975.
The opposition parties could only muster 21 votes for their
alternative candidateJulius Chanwho was backed by
his Peoples Progress Party as well as Bart Philemons
New Generation Party and Mekere Morautas Papua New Guinea
Party. Philemon and Morauta had campaigned vigorously against
Somare, claiming corruption and economic mismanagement and calling
for closer ties with AustraliaPNGs former colonial
ruler.
The outcome was a serious setback for the opposition parties,
and also the Australian government, which openly intervened in
the course of the election to undermine Somare. Canberra repeatedly
called for the release of a PNG Defence Forces report into Somares
alleged involvement in assisting the Solomon Islands Attorney-General
Julian Moti to leave Port Moresby last September after he had
been arrested at the instigation of Australian officials.
The entire Moti affair is a cynical provocation orchestrated
by Canberra to undermine Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare in the
Solomon Islands and Somare in PNG, both of whom have objected
to Australian dictates. The Howard government dredged up old child
sex charges that had already been thrown out of court in Vanuatu
as a means of smearing Moti and demanding his extradition. Motis
arrest and subsequent escape while on bail in Port Moresby has
been exploited to aggressively pursue Somare.
Like Philemon and Morauta, Somare has no compunction in pursuing
the economic restructuring agenda demanded by the IMF and World
Bank that has led to a widening gulf between rich and poor. He
earned the Howard governments ire, however, by seeking alternative
sources of aid and investment, including from China, and objecting
to the imposition of an Enhanced Cooperation Package (ECP), which
installed Australian advisers to supervise key aspects
of the PNG state apparatus, including police, finance, treasury
and the judiciary.
Canberras interference in the PNG election appears to
have backfired by enabling Somare to posture as a defender of
the countrys sovereignty. Despite public hostility over
the impact of the governments economic policies, his National
Alliance gained more seats than at the previous election. Commenting
after his victory, Somare defiantly declared: We will guard
the sovereignty of our country, we will help our neighbours whenever
we can.
Former Australian diplomat and Howard government critic Tony
Kevin told Reuters: The lesson for Australia is to be less
heavy handed. Far from backing down, however, the Howard
government immediately made clear it would continue its campaign
against Somare. Foreign Minister Alexander Downer reiterated his
demand for the release of the PNG Defence Force report.
In an editorial on August 14, the Australian defended
the Howard governments aggressive intervention in PNG politics
and its demands for the report to be released. The newspaper had
earlier obtained and published a leaked copy of the report, highlighting
its recommendation for Somare to be charged over the Moti affair.
It should be noted that Canberra has a number of advisers
throughout the PNG Defence Force.
Downer has continually insisted that relations between the
two countries will only be normalised if Canberra deems that PNG
has acted appropriately on the findings of the Defence Report.
This would mean Somare facing charges, with the likelihood of
imprisonment and removal from the leadership of the country. The
Howard government has placed travel bans on PNG politicians over
the Moti affair.
Despite their electoral defeat, the opposition parties are
also seeking to challenge Somares installation as prime
minister on the basis of several legal technicalities.
Firstly, Philemon and Morauta have pointed to the National
Alliance constitution, claiming it prevents anyone from serving
two consecutive terms as parliamentary leader, thus disqualifying
Somare. At a press conference on 8 August, they also said National
Alliance members had disregarded the constitution by not meeting
to elect a leader after the votes in the election were tallied.
The opposition is further seeking to have the current process
whereby the largest party is given the first opportunity to form
government declared invalid by the Supreme Court. Their argument
is that, in its amendments to the Organic Law Act in 2003, the
Somare government deleted certain parts from Section 63, Subsection
5, thus rendering the whole section dealing with the election
of the prime minister invalid.
If Morautas camp is successful, the stipulations of the
Organic Law will be disregarded and individual parliamentarians
will no longer be bound by party loyalties. This could mean Somares
appointment would be nullified and another parliamentary vote
would take place. Philemon and Morauta would be free to horse-trade
with individual parliamentarians, including with members of the
National Alliance.
The cynicism of this move is highlighted by the fact that Morauta,
while in office from 1999 to 2002, was pivotal in implementing
the Organic Law to try to restore stability to the volatile PNG
parliament. Canberra welcomed the new law at the time. Despite
the small number of seats won by his party, Morauta, who is backed
by Australia, is seeking to gain office in a free-for-all that
will only lead to further instability.
The Morauta-Philemon opposition has no differences of real
substance with the economic agenda of the Somare government. Philemon
served for several years as the treasurer in Somares government,
earning Canberras praise for his market reforms and tight
social spending. His falling out with Somare was not due to differences
over social or economic policy, but over his failed leadership
challenge.
The Somare government has presided over a relatively buoyant
economy due to high commodity prices and increased investment
in mining and forestry. It loosened taxes for exploration in mining
and allowed the increased plunder of PNG forests by companies
such as the notorious logging giant Rimbunan Hijau. Little of
the increased government revenue has gone to improving social
services or ending widespread poverty.
The countrys social indices are among the worst in the
region. In a report released last year, the World Bank noted that
a greater proportion of the population lives in poverty now than
10 years ago. AIDS is on the increase and a disaster
of African proportions looms.
The social crisis is reflected in growing political alienation
and the emergence of bitter rivalry between the countrys
many different tribal and language groups. In the recent election,
22 parties and 2,759 candidates were vying for the 109 parliamentary
seatseach seeking a large slice of dwindling government
resources for their area. While there were fewer outbreaks of
violence than during the 2002 election, a heavy police presence
points to continuing instability.
The Australian government and its local allies are certain
to exploit the political uncertainty to undermine the newly elected
Somare government, in the first instance using the Moti affair.
For all of its talk about the need for good governance and democracy
in the Pacific, Canberra has no scruples in exploiting all available
means to impose its dictates, with complete disregard for the
wishes of local people.
See Also:
Solomon Islands attorney-general rebuts
Australian government child sex allegations
[14 August 2007]
Somare set to win PNG election
despite Canberra's smear campaign
[31 July 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |