|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Bush administration moves to block inquiries into CIAs
destruction of torture tapes
By Joe Kay
17 December 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The Bush administration has taken aggressive steps to undermine
congressional and judicial inquiries into the CIAs destruction
of videotapes showing the torture of at least two prisoners. The
move is only the latest demonstration of the administrations
lawlessness and contempt for democratic and constitutional norms.
The tapes in question recorded hundreds of hours of interrogation
of two alleged Al Qaeda members, Abu Zubaydah and Abd al-Rahim
al-Nashiri, both captured by the CIA in 2002. Among the techniques
used on the prisoners was water-boarding, a notorious torture
method involving the near-drowning of the prisoner. Earlier this
month, CIA director Michael Hayden acknowledged that the intelligence
agency had destroyed the tapes in November 2005.
Since that admission, it has become clear that the Bush administration
and leading congressmen of both parties knew about the CIA torture
program and the existence of the tapes for years before the tapes
were destroyed. The White House and officials in the Justice Department
and CIA are now implicated in both the crime of torture and possible
obstruction of justice and perjury in relation to the tapes
destruction.
Even as it works to squelch inquiries into past torture, the
White House and its congressional allies have moved to block a
bill that would ban the CIA from using enhanced interrogation
techniques, including water-boarding, in the future. Senate
Republicans are using a procedural technicality to strip language
from a bill passed by the House of Representatives that would
require the CIA to follow the same rules as the US military. Bush
has threatened to veto the bill if it gets through the House and
Senate.
Late last week, the administration indicated that it would
not cooperate with inquires announced by the Judiciary and Intelligence
committees in the House and Senate.
In a letter to members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Attorney
General Michael Mukasey made the absurd declaration that any cooperation
with congressional investigations would raise questions as to
the independence of the Justice Departments own inquiry.
At my confirmation hearing, I testified that I would act
independently, resist political pressure and ensure that politics
plays no role in cases brought by the Department of Justice,
Mukasey wrote. Therefore, I will not at this time provide
further information in response to your letter.
Thus Mukasey, in Orwellian fashion, defends bowing to political
pressure from the White House in the name of resisting political
pressure.
The Senate committee had requested from Mukasey an account
of the Justice Departments role in and knowledge of the
tapes destruction. Mukasey was confirmed as attorney general
with the support of several key Democratic leaders last month,
despite his refusal to condemn water-boarding as torture. Among
those voting for Mukasey were key Democrats on the Senate Judiciary
CommitteeDianne Feinstein of California and Charles Schumer
of New York.
Also last week, the House Intelligence Committee requested
testimony from CIA officials, including Jose Rodriguez, the former
head of clandestine operations who has been named as the individual
who authorized the tapes destruction, and John Rizzo, the
top lawyer at the CIA. The committee has also requested that the
CIA turn over documents and e-mails relating to the decision to
destroy the videotapes.
The Justice Department responded with a December 14 letter
to the committee requesting that it delay any investigation in
order to avoid significant risks to the joint inquiry
being organized by the department and the CIA. The White House
also instructed the CIA not to cooperate with congressional requests
for information.
The Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee,
Silvestre Reyes, and the ranking Republican, Peter Hoekstra, issued
a joint statement declaring, Parallel investigations occur
all the time, and there is no basis upon which the attorney general
can stand in the way of our work. They threatened to use
all the tools available to Congress, including subpoenas
to continue the congressional investigation.
The administration is also moving to scuttle court requests
for information on the tapes destruction. Lawyers in one
case before the US District Court for the District of Columbia
filed a motion asking Judge Henry Kennedy to determine whether
the destruction of the tapes constitutes a violation of a 2005
order by the judge. The court at that time ordered the government
to preserve all evidence regarding the interrogation and torture
of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay.
The Justice Department submitted a brief on Friday evening
warning that any request for information could potentially
complicate the ongoing efforts to arrive at a full factual understanding
of the matter. A judicial inquiry is both unnecessary
and potentially disruptive, the department declared.
The government is claiming that the tapes are not relevant
to the investigation because the prisoners in question were not
at Guantánamo Bay at the time of the order. The judge could
nevertheless rule that the destruction was a criminal act because
the videotapes were of likely significance to a legal case. The
Bush administration did not acknowledge the existence of secret
overseas CIA prisons, where the two alleged Al Qaeda operatives
were tortured, until late 2006, when both Zubaydah and al-Nashiri
were transferred to Guantánamo Bay.
In a separate court case filed last Wednesday, the American
Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) asked a federal judge in New York
to find the CIA in contempt for violating a 2004 court order requiring
the CIA to turn over or account for all documents relating to
the interrogation of prisoners in US custody, regardless of their
location.
These tapes were clearly responsive to the Freedom of
Information Act requests that we filed in 2003 and 2004, and accordingly
the CIA was under a legal obligation to produce the tapes to us
or to provide a legal justification for withholding them,
said Jameel Jaffer, Director of the ACLUs National Security
Project. By destroying these tapes, the CIA violated the
statute as well as an order of the court. In the circumstances,
it would be entirely appropriate for the court to hold the agency
in contempt.
In addition to these cases, the CIA likely violated the law
in withholding the videotapes from the 9/11 Commission and from
the court involved in the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, who was
ultimately convicted of participating in the planning for 9/11.
The tapes were destroyed shortly after a judge in the Moussaoui
trial requested that the CIA turn over videotapes of the interrogation
of Al Qaeda suspects.
The Bush administration is using the same pretextthe
existence of an ongoing investigationto justify its refusal
to make any public comments on the tapes, aside from the declaration
that Bush has no recollection of the tapes or their
destruction.
The administration is essentially arguing that because it is
investigating itself and possible crimes that it committed, no
other investigations can proceed.
The position of the Bush administration on the current scandal
is in line with its previous assertions of unconstrained executive
power and the rejection of any accountability for its actions.
A major constitutional crisis is possible, though the White House
is once again counting on leading Democratsthemselves complicit
in the CIA torture programto back down.
In an interview on Fox News Sunday, Peter Hoekstra,
the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, and
Democrat Jane Harman, former ranking Democrat on the committee,
said their committee would proceed with their investigation despite
opposition from the White House and the Justice Department. Hoekstra
repeated the threat to subpoena CIA officials to compel their
testimony. In the event of a subpoena, the administration might
invoke executive privilege, as it has done in the past, to block
testimony.
While indicating that the committee would defy the White House,
Hoekstra focused most of his ire on the CIA and the intelligence
apparatus. I think its important for Congress to hold
this community accountable, he said. The CIA did not
tell us about the existence of these tapes. They did not tell
us that they were going to be destroyed. Hoekstra said of
the CIA that they dont believe they are accountable
to anybody. They dont believe that they are accountable
to the president.
Hoekstras statement that Congress was never informed
of the tapes was immediately contradicted by Harman, who noted
that Congressspecifically, Iwarned them not
to destroy the videotapes in 2003. Harman and other leading
members of both parties were informed of the CIAs intention
to destroy the tapes, but did nothing to inform the American people
about the existence of the tapes or the existence of the CIA torture
program.
Both Harman and Hoekstra have rejected the appointment of a
special prosecutor, which a few Democrats have called for. Harman
voiced concern, however, that any investigation carried out solely
by the Justice Department and the CIA would be widely perceived
as a whitewash.
On a bipartisan basis, she said, the House
Intelligence Committee wants to get to the bottom of this and
isnt going to back off for the attorney general here, who
I think...may be doing something that wont give the public
confidence that it was a full and fair investigation. She
and Hoekstra reflected concerns within the political establishment
that without a congressional investigation, the demand for a special
prosecutor will grow.
Democratic Senator Evan Bayh, a member of the Senate Intelligence
Committee, voiced similar concerns on CNNs Late Edition.
Its entirely possible there was nothing illegal
on those tapes, he said. Its even entirely possible
that their destruction was not illegal. But the way theyre
going about this makes it look like theyre trying to hide
something which may embarrass them when, by being more forthcoming,
they could avoid that. His statement amounted to a plea
to the White House that it stop stonewalling and instead cooperate
in a joint whitewash.
In their appearance on the CNN program, Bayh and Republican
Senator Kit Bond both rejected the naming of a special prosecutor.
Whatever conflicts may develop between Congress and the White
House over the destruction of the tapes, both the Democrats and
the Republicans are agreed on the need to obscure the fundamental
issue involved: that the CIA, with the sanction of both parties
and under the direction of the White House, engaged in torture
in violation of international and domestic law.
See Also:
CIA director testifies behind closed doors
on destroyed tapes
[12 December 2007]
Both parties supported US interrogation
program
[10 December 2007]
CIA destroyed torture tapes
[8 December 2007]
Democrats cave in on torture:
Key senators back attorney general nominee
[3 November 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |