|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Britain: London antiwar demonstration downplays threat of
war against Iran
By Richard Tyler
27 February 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
In 2003, one million people took to the streets of London to
protest against the war in Iraq. Four years later, amidst Bushs
surge in Iraq and the advanced preparations for a
military assault on Iran, the capital saw somewhat less than 30,000
march on Saturday under the slogan, No TridentTroops
out of Iraq.
What can account for this dramatic decline in numbers? Have
the antiwar sentiments that mobilised broad layers of people in
London and around the world drastically subsided? The answer is
clearly no.
Internationally, poll after poll has recorded a growing majority
opposing the brutal occupation of Iraq. In Britain, the Blair
government is riven by crisis and the prime ministers own
approval rating is at an all-time low. Labour faces being dislodged
from government in the devolved Scottish Parliament and could
lose hundreds of council seats in the May local elections, primarily
as a result of the rejection by the electorate of its pro-war
policies.
In the November 2006 mid-term elections in the United States,
the Bush administration suffered a significant defeat when American
voters rebuffed the warmongering of the right-wing clique that
controls the White House.
But whereas opposition to the war has grown, the political
bankruptcy of those who would lead the antiwar movement has become
ever clearer.
The speeches in Trafalgar Square were best characterised by
what they did not say. Although some voiced perfunctory opposition
to the launching of a war against Iran, not a single person on
the platform devoted any real attention to the terrible consequences
of US (or Israeli) strikes against Tehran.
There was no analysis of the significant build-up of US military
forces in the Gulf in preparation for such a war, nor of the sinister
propaganda campaign launched by the White House to demonise Iran
and soften up public opinion in readiness for the
bombing operations.
Rather than base the struggle against militarism on a fight
for a socialist programme to put an end to the profit system that
fuels the drive to war, the Stop the War Coalition (STWC), in
which the Socialist Workers Party plays a leading role, focuses
on efforts to build up dissenting elements within the political
establishment who oppose the war in Iraq for purely tactical reasonsincluding
politicians from various parties such as the Greens and Welsh
nationalist Plaid Cymru, and religious leaders, but centring on
what remains of the Labour Party left.
The central message it puts forward is that protests and demonstrations
will strengthen the hand of those calling for a shift in foreign
policy and in this way force the government to change course.
Naturally this perspective, based on securing political alliances
with Labourites while building up the influence in official political
circles of the SWP, its new political vehicle Respect and various
Muslim leaders, excludes any genuine mobilisation of working people
to build a political alternative to the Labour government.
Everything must instead be kept at the level of a vague pacifist
opposition to war that is acceptable to the parade of Labour politicians
that was given centre stage at Trafalgar SquareMPs
John McDonnell, Jeremy Corbyn and Jon Trickett, London Mayor Ken
Livingstone and former MP Tony Bennalongside Respects
own MP George Galloway.
Speaking for the protest organisers, leading SWP member Lindsey
German went so far as to claim that the Stop the War Coalition
had succeeded in forcing Prime Minister Tony Blair to back down
by announcing the withdrawal of 1,500 troops from Basra, claiming,
We are responsible for those troops withdrawing from Iraq.
Blair didnt want to do it and George Bush did not want him
to do it. And it is our movement that has made him withdraw even
that small number of troops from Iraq.
Such claims, like the constant inflation of the numbers involved
in the antiwar proteststhe SWP said that 100,000 had taken
part on Saturdayare designed to cover up the political dead
end into which those seeking to oppose the war danger are being
led. For this reason, German had little to say about why Blair
followed his reluctant scale-down of troops in Iraq with a declaration
that they could be increased at any time and that Britain was
sending an additional 1,000 troops to Afghanistan as has been
demanded by the Army top brass.
Instead, German stated that we have one message for Tony
Blair: Dont renew Trident, get the troops out and dont
even think of attacking Iran. Because if you do, we are going
to be on the streets in even bigger numbers.
Galloway pathetically used his speech to call for a spoof cover-version
of Edwin Starrs War, featuring Tony Blairs
image manipulated to look like he is singing, to be made a chart-topper
through downloads. This, he said, offered the mighty
demonstration ... a chance to make history today.
The extent to which the organisers have sought to transform
the antiwar movement into an adjunct of official politics was
given fullest expression by the platform accorded to John McDonnell
MP, who is challenging for the leadership of the Labour Party
when Tony Blair resigns. Voicing the fears of a section of the
ruling elite that too close a relation with Washington is threatening
Britains national interests, he centred his criticism of
Blair on the claim that We want a British prime minister
that speaks independently for Britain and does not parade around
the world like some virtual vice president of the USA.
See Also:
London: Demonstrators express grave concern
over Iran
[27 February 2007]
US war drums beat louder after Iran fails
to meet UN deadline
[26 February 2007]
US Vice President Cheney menaces Iran
with military aggression
[24 February 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |