|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Germany
German army and air force deployed against G8 summit demonstrators
By Emma Bode
31 July 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Although the German constitution strictly forbids the intervention
of the army for domestic purposes, German army units and an air
force squadron were used to spy on demonstrators in the course
of the G8 summit of world leaders held in Germany in the middle
of June. Tornado fighter aircraft were switched from their current
mission in Afghanistan to fly over and photograph the camps set
up by demonstrators on the fringes of the G8 summit held in the
German resort of Heiligendamm.
Following a brief flurry of criticism for the deployment, it
now seems likely that the German government has nothing to fear
in the way of repercussions, and attempts are underway to bury
the issue in official committees. Neither the media nor official
political bodies are showing any interest. Only the interior committee
of the state parliament of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania has announced
it will look into the issue of co-operation between police and
military, which it describes as merely of a technical and logistical
nature. Although the affair took place less than two months ago,
the press has largely dropped it.
The ban on the use of the army inside German territory is,
in common with many other clauses of the post-war German constitution,
bound up with the bitter historical experiences suffered under
the Nazi regime, the Weimar Republic and the German Empire (which
employed the slogan, Soldiers are the only way to stop Democrats).
In accordance with article 35 of the Basic Law, the German
army can be called upon to intervene domestically only in the
case of major accidents or natural catastrophes. In a judgment
last year in connection with air security, the Constitutional
Court confirmed that in the event of a domestic intervention,
the German army could not employ specific military measuresi.e.
it was restricted to the same measures that are normally the reserve
of the police.
Since assuming office, German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble
(Christian Democratic UnionCDU) has sought to systematically
overcome the legal restrictions on the use of the German army
and has repeatedly evoked the danger of terrorist attacks to argue
for an amendment to the constitution. Up until now, the second
main partner in the German grand coalition government, the Social
Democratic Party (SPD), has refused to countenance such an amendment.
Now the SPD has been confronted with a fait accompli with regard
to the German army intervention at the G8 summit in Heiligendamm,
but the partys leadership has put up no serious opposition.
Representatives of both SPD and CDU in the governing coalition
have either sought to justify, or play down, the deployment of
the army against demonstrators.
The SPDs domestic affairs speaker, Dieter Wiefelspuetz,
merely described the deployment of the German army as lacking
in discretion, while the SPD defence speaker, Rainer Arnold,
described the use of German air force personnel and machines as
a doubtful mission.
CDU domestic affairs speaker, Wolfgang Bosbach, declared that
the aerial sweep of the camp set up by G8 protesters was legitimate
as a measure to prevent severe criminal offences, while the CDU
expert on military issues, Bernd Siebert, proclaimed, The
deployment was clearly covered by the constitution. The
German chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) has lined up behind her
Interior Minister and made clear that she had long been in favour
of the army taking over more duties internally.
A hearing organized in Berlin by the Republican Lawyer Association
(RAV) made clear the extent of the intervention carried out by
the German army in Heiligendamm.
Evidence at the hearing included film taken by a G8 protester
in the nearby city of Rostock on June 6. The protester, a former
German soldier, had personally observed the direct coordination
between members of an army unit and the police and was able to
identify the unit on the basis of vehicle identification plates.
The vehicles involved were part of a tank reconnaissance unit,
whose military tasks consist of identifying and destroying
the enemy. Tanks equipped with cameras and night-vision
devices had been located at motorway bridges and fields close
to where protesters held demonstrations.
A number of helicopters bearing the words Army
and Air Force were also used to guide police units
accompanying the demonstrators. These reports have been indirectly
confirmed by spokesmen for the German army.
Another witness described the activities of a military defence
service unit, which spied on a local community organization, and
the deployment of Tornado combat aircraft, which flew with a terrifying
noise an estimated 70 meters over the camps of the G8 protesters.
The planes involved belong to the German air force squadron
51 Max Immelmann and were active between 1995 to 2001
in the course of the Balkans War. Part of NATOs rapid strike
force, the Immelmann squadron operates world-wide
and has recently flown missions in Sudan and Afghanistan.
The use of Tornado reconnaissance planes for the surveillance
and intimidation of anti-G8 demonstrators has been made the subject
of an enquiry by the defence committee of the German parliament,
which meets behind closed doors. The parliament defence committee
has the task of agreeing on the national defence budget and exercises
a certain parliamentary control function in relation to the army.
According to press reports, the defence committee had agreed
to the use of 1,100 soldiers for the G8 summit but had not given
the go-ahead for the use of Tornado aircraft. Instead approval
for two Tornado flights is said to have been personally given
by Defence Secretary Franz Josef Jung. In fact, the squadron carried
out a total of seven flights, not two. While admitting a discrepancy
of five flights, the Defence Minister went on to justify the entire
action, declaring that the missions conformed to the German constitution.
According to the online version of the magazine Der Spiegel,
the total cost of the air force intervention during the G8
summit amounted to approximately 10 million euros.
While constitutional experts declare that the Defence Minister
is operating in a legal grey zone, the fact is that
the recent decision by the Constitutional Court regarding air
security again confirmed that military means cannot be employed
against the domestic population. It is clear that the open and
provocative use of German units and the air force in Heligendamm,
together with a propaganda campaign warning of the danger of terrorism
and terror attacks, was aimed at setting a precedent whereby the
German population is forced to accustom itself to the use of the
military on German streets.
The government has since issued demonstrators an apology
for the irregular, low-altitude flights, but cynically maintained
that the main problem was the noise arising from the flights.
Parliamentary undersecretary Christian Schmidt (CSU) granted in
the Bundestag that a Tornado flight incontestably represents
a not insignificant disturbance, but at the same time denied
that the flights represented any violation of the basic right
of assembly.
In terms of their physical appearance it is barely possible
to draw a distinction between high-tech German army units and
the armoured police that intervened so viciously in the anti-G8
mass demonstration in Rostock. Nevertheless, the blatant deployment
of the German army in Heligendamm, together with the lack of any
serious political opposition to the move, must be taken as a severe
warning of the measures being prepared by the German state to
deal with domestic opposition to its policies.
See Also:
German minister calls for internment
and assassination of terror suspects
[11 July 2007]
German government complicity
in CIA abductions: The case of Khaled al-Masri
[30 June 2007]
Germany: Huge security operation
exposed in wake of G8 summit
[20 June 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |