|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Sri
Lanka
Sri Lankan defence secretary defends the militarys crimes
By Wije Dias
2 July 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A BBC interview last month with Sri Lankan Defence Secretary
Gotabaya Rajapakse provided a chilling insight into the gangster
mentality of the countrys government. Together with his
brother Mahinda Rajapakse, Sri Lankas president, Gotabaya
Rajapakse, the countrys top defence bureaucrat, wields wide
powers as the military intensifies its aggressive war against
the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).
The interview took place after the illegal detention and forced
expulsion of temporary residents from Colombo. On June 7, the
police and military rounded up 376 Tamil men, women and children
in a pre-dawn raid from cheap lodge accommodation in the capital,
put them on buses and dumped them without any form of assistance
in the war zones of the North and East. Ignoring basic constitutional
and legal rights, the police claimed that the Tamil residents
had no business to stay in the capital.
This gross abuse of democratic rights provoked immediate uproar
in Sri Lanka and internationally, putting the government on the
back foot. Defence spokesman Keheliya Rambukwella initially tried
to justify the action by falsely saying the departures had been
voluntary.
However, as criticism continued to mount and the Supreme Court
issued an interim injunction against further expulsions, the government
backed down. President Rajapakse blamed the police chief and ordered
an inquiry into the operation. Three days after the action, Prime
Minister Ratnasiri Wickremanayake held a press conference to apologise
for the big mistake and promised such things would
never happen again.
Within 24 hours, Gotabaya Rajapakse gave his interview to the
BBC which was anything but apologetic and defended the actions
of the security forces to the hilt. As far as the defence secretary
was concerned, the arbitrary roundup of Tamils was completely
justified on the grounds of national security and
the decision to expel them from the capital even quite benevolent
in character.
We have to do search operations and when we arrest suspicious
people you dont know whos who. We cant arrest
300 people and then detain them, Rajapakse told the BBC.
So you tell them, You dont have any legal business
in Colombo, there is a security problem in Colombo, you are the
people who are suspected of... we dont want to detain you,
go back to your homes.
According to Rajapakse, the problem was not democratic rights
or legality, but one of logistics. The security forces routinely
detain suspicious people and hold them indefinitely
without trial under the countrys anti-democratic Prevention
of Terrorism Act. But the round-up of so many men, women and children
made it difficult to detain them all, so they were bussed out
of Colombo and dumped. The unstated alternative would have been
to disappear or murder them allas has happened
to hundreds of people, mainly Tamils, over the past 18 months.
The communal character of the operation was underscored by
Rajapakse himself, when he pleaded: When you arrest suspicious
people we dont know whos who. When one considers
that all the deportees were Tamils, it is clear that the sole
basis for suspicion was ethnicity and language. What
Rajapakse blurted out is the racist ideology that underpins the
war: as far as the government and the military are concerned,
all Tamils are the enemy and thus legitimate targets for harassment,
intimidation, abuse and murder.
Having justified the round-up, Rajapakse abused the critics,
accusing Britain and the UN in particular of bullying Sri
Lanka over human rights. He defiantly declared: Britain,
or Western countries, the EU countries, they can do whatever.
We dont depend on them. They think that [from them] we get
aid. No, they are not giving anything... We wont get isolated.
We have all the SAARC [South Asian Association for Regional Co-operation]
countries, the Asian countries.
For all this posturing of standing up to the major powers,
the Sri Lankan government has been completely dependent on the
tacit support, particularly of the US, as it has plunged the country
back to civil war. In return for his backing of the Bush administrations
bogus war on terror, the US, Britain, the EU and the
UN have remained virtually silent since President Rajapakse ordered
the military onto the offensive last July in open breach of the
2002 ceasefire agreement. If muted criticisms are now being made,
it is only because Sri Lankas human rights abuses are so
open and flagrant.
The continued silence of all the SAARC countries on the Sri
Lankan militarys repression is no surprise. Pakistan and
Bangladesh are governed by military dictatorships in all but name,
which do not hesitate to resort to the same ruthless methods against
opposition in their own countries. As for India, for all its democratic
pretensions, it has its own anti-terror legislation,
which it has used to brutally suppress separatist movements in
Kashmir and other parts of the country. Any limited Indian criticisms
of the Sri Lankan war are made with an eye to the outrage being
generated among Tamils in southern India.
Rajapakse absurdly branded the UN as an LTTE propaganda tool
for tentatively raising the issue of human rights violations by
the Colombo government. The UN, he claimed, had been infiltrated
by the LTTE. The UN organisation has taken lot of locals
into the organisation. For 30 years or so the LTTE planned this,
they infiltrated the UN, Rajapakse said. He produced no
list of the UN infiltrators or any other evidence
to justify his extraordinary allegations.
Rajapakses most revealing and disturbing comments came
when he sought to justify the criminal activities of the Sri Lankan
military by referring to the crimes of the Bush administration.
Complaining about double standards, he declared: All
the militaries do covert operations. When the US does operations
they say covert operations. When something is [done] in Sri Lanka
they call it abductions. This is playing with words... What I
am saying is, if there is a terrorist group, why cant you
do anything? I am talking about terrorists. Anything is fair,
he said.
In an attempt to put the cat back into the bag, Rajapakse immediately
declared that he was fully against abductions. But
the implication is obvious: all militaries, including the Sri
Lankan military, are engaged in covert operations.
If the US military and CIA can seize, detain, torture and kill
people with impunity, then why the criticism when the Sri Lankan
security forces do the same! Rajapakse is all but admitting that
the government and the military are directly responsible for the
death squads that have carried out hundreds of disappearances
and murders over the past 18 months.
There should indeed be no double standards. Like Bush and his
cronies in the White House, Rajapakse, his brother the president,
government ministers and military top brass are directing a criminal
war of aggression and should be tried for war crimes.
Significantly Defence Secretary Rajapakses interview
with the BBC provoked no criticism from President Rajapakse, Prime
Minister Wickremanayake or other ministers, making clear that
the governments apology for the expulsion of hundreds of
Tamils from Colombo was simply window dressing. The reactionary
war and the accompanying campaign of repression against the Tamil
minority and all opposition to the governments policies
will continue unabated.
See Also:
Sri Lankan government cracks
down on protesting farmers
[28 June 2007]
Sri Lankan president's "peace"
mask starts to slip off
[21 June 2007]
Heavy fighting continues in
the North and East of Sri Lanka
[15 June 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |