|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : Canada
New study documents increasing income inequality in Canada
By John Mackay and Keith Jones
20 June 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A study released last March and titled The rich and the
rest of usThe changing face of Canadas growing gap
reveals that Canadian society is becoming dramatically more unequal,
with the gap between the earnings of the richest Canadians and
the rest, both those considered middle-income and the poor, widening.
The study, which analyses the income earnings of Canadian families
with children, shows a steady increase in the gap between rich
and poor from 1976 to 2004, with the gap widening at an accelerated
rate since the 1990s. The study was conducted by the Canadian
Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA), an independent, nonpartisan
research institute with close ties to the labor bureaucracy.
The CCPA study found that in 2004, the average earnings of
the richest 10 percent of Canadian families raising children were
82 times greater than those earned by the poorest 10 percent.
Earnings are defined as what is earned from the labor market and
investments and does not include income from social-welfare and
tax-credits programs. While such assistance is insufficient and
has been severely curtailed over the last two decades, the report
underscores that without it a considerable section of Canadas
population would be reduced to absolute poverty.
In considering the reports findings, it is important
not to confuse annual income with wealth. The wealth gap between
Canadas rich and poor is as great, or even greater, than
the income gap. According to a Statistics Canada study released
late last year, 50 percent of Canadians in 2005 owned just 3.2
percent of the countrys wealth, while the richest 10 percent
of Canadians owned 58.2 percent of the wealth.
The CCPA report demonstrates that the gap between the earned
incomes of the wealthiest 10 percent of Canadian families and
the poorest 10 percent has almost tripled in the three decades
since 1976, the ratio rising from 31 to 1 in 1976 to 82 to 1 in
2004.
If further shows that only the richest 10 percent of Canadian
families saw a significant increase in their share of both earnings
and after-tax income between the late 1970s and the first years
of the 21st century. In the 1976-79 period, the wealthiest 10
percent of Canadian families accounted for 23.2 percent of all
family earnings. By 2001-04, they accounted for 29.5 percent.
During the same period, their share of after-tax income increased
by over 15 percent, rising from 21.2 percent to 24.5 percent.
In the late 1970s the poorest 20 percent of all Canadian families
earned 4.5 percent of total family earnings. By the first years
of the 21st century their share had shrunk to just 2.6 percent.
Whereas the poorer half of Canadians families accounted for
27 percent of total earnings between 1976 and 1979, they accounted
for just 20.5 percent in 2001-04. The share of after-tax income
going to the bottom half of Canadians declined during the same
period by 3 percentage points, or some 10 percent, falling from
31 percent to 28.1 percent.
The report demonstrates that while Canadas economy has
experienced significant growth over the past quarter centuryreal
economic output almost doubled between 1981 and 2005the
poorer half of Canadian families either earned less
in inflation-adjusted terms or just the same as their predecessors
almost 30 years ago.
Gains in real income have gone only to the top half of Canadian
families and since the late 1990s, exclusively to the wealthiest
20 percent of Canadians, especially the top 10 percent.
The average Canadian worker made just over $38,000 in 2005,
a 15 percent increase over average earnings in 1998 of just over
$33,000. But during the same period, the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) rose 17.85 percent, meaning that, after adjusting for inflation,
the average worker actually lost purchasing power. During the
same period the earnings of the wealthiest 10 percent of families
with children rose by some $25,000 after taking inflation into
account.
One of the disadvantages of the CCPA report is that the data
it used enabled it only to measure income in 10 percent increments.
This obscures the more extreme concentrations of wealth and income
among the very rich, that is among the top 1 and even .1 percent
of wage earners.
Nonetheless the report does note that there has been a spectacular
increase in the financial compensation paid the managerial elite.
Between 1998 and 2005, Canadas top 100 CEOs saw a 262 percent
increase in their compensation, pocketing an average of $9.1 million
in 2005 compared to $3.5 million in 1998. In 1998, the countrys
top executives earned, on average, 106 times an average worker.
By 2005, only seven years later, they earned 240 times as much.
A recent study by University of California economist Emmanuel
Saez and Michael Veall of McMaster University does shed light
on the surge in the incomes of the extremely wealthy in Canada.
The Saez-Veall study shows that the share of pre-tax income going
to the top 5 percent of income earners rose from about 25 percent
to 29 percent, between 1995 and 2000. During this same period,
the share accruing to the top 1 percent of income earners rose
from 10 to 13.5 percent and the income share of the top .1 percent
(the 20,527 Canadians with average incomes in excess of $920.000)
increased from around 3 to more than 4 percent.
In summarizing their findings, Saez and Veall note that incomes
trends in Canada are almost identical to those in the US: Over
the last 20 years, top income shares in Canada have increased
dramatically, almost as much as in the United States. This change
has largely remained unnoticed because it is concentrated within
the top percentile of the Canadian income distribution and thus
can be detected only with tax return data covering very high incomes.
Returning to the CCPA study, it also found that there is increasing
inequality in the hours worked by individuals with different earning
capacities. While the real wages of most Canadians have stagnated
or even fallen in recent years, they are actually working longer
hours.
The average Canadian household with children is working nearly
200 more hours per year compared to just nine years ago. The one
group that did not increase their work hours between 1996 and
2004 was the group that monopolized real income gains, the richest
10 percent of families.
In this regard, it is important to take note of a recent Statistics
Canada finding, which was given some publicity after a Canadian
Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) employee filed a class action
lawsuit against her employer for unpaid overtime. According to
Statistics Canada, 1.6 million Canadian preformed unpaid overtime
in the month of April.
Two other points made in the CCPA report bear comment.
It notes that federal and provincial governments have curtailed
the states role in redistributing income through income
support programs and progressive taxation. Income support programs
that primarily benefit the less well-off have been slashed, while
governments have cut taxes and reduced the differential between
the rates at which low and high incomes are taxed. Nevertheless,
asserts the CCPA report, what remains of the tax and transfer
system stopped a freefall of incomes for almost half
of the population raising children.
Based on this finding, the reports authors make a clarion
call to Canadas elite to valorize the role of
the federal government in binding the destinies of our many diverse
parts together. They warn that growing social inequality
threatens to produce social turbulence that will make Canadian
capitalism unsustainable: We ignore these trends at our
collective peril.
The reality is that all sections of Canadas political
elite, including the trade union-supported New Democratic Party,
have participated during the past quarter century in the dismantling
of the welfare state and sought to maintain the international
competitiveness of Canadian capital by ever-more aggressively
attacking workers rights, cutting corporate taxes, and otherwise
pursuing policies aimed at maximizing corporate profits and redistributing
wealth to the benefit of the most privileged sections of society.
Also of significance is the CCPA reports reference to
a previous study it published in 2006. That study found 76 percent
of Canadians believe the gap between the rich and poor is growing
and that 67 percent of the population do not believe that the
majority is benefiting from the countrys economic growth.
A May 7 editorial in the Globe and Mail, Canadas
paper of record, points to both the nervousness of
the Canadian elite over popular resentment at increased social
inequality and economic insecurity and its firm intention to continue
on the same course.
Titled Prosperity has lifted almost all our boats,
the editorial celebrated a Statistics Canada report that showed
the median after-tax income for Canadian families rose by 1.6
percent between 2004 and 2005. While conceding that there are
persons whose income has stalled and the gap
between the highest-income families and the lowest-income families
widened, the Globe urged its readers to take
heart from the fact that there is no seething underclass, slipping
further behind.... The system is working.
Working for whom? Not for the vast majority of Canadians whose
real incomes, as the CCPA has documented, have stagnated or fallen
even as they work longer hours. But certainly for the Globes
proprietors, the Thomson family. In 1998, the Thomson fortune
was estimated at US$14.4 billion, a total that surpassed the collective
wealth of the poorest third of all Canadian households. Today,
Ken Thomson is said to be worth a staggering $US24.4 billion,
making him, according to Forbes magazine, one of the 10
richest people in the world.
The CCPA report can be accessed here http://www.growinggap.ca/
See Also:
Canada: Report
documents staggering growth in social inequality
[4 November 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |