|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific : Fiji
Fiji: Pacific Islands Forum report urges coup leader to stand
aside
By Frank Gaglioti
1 March 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A Pacific Islands Forum Eminent Persons Group (EPG) report,
leaked to the PacNews agency on February 20, urges the Fijian
military regime to stand aside and install an interim civilian
administration. However, it does not call for a return of Prime
Minister Laisenia Qarases government, which was forced out
of office on December 5.
In effect, the report applies diplomatic pressure to the junta
to bow to the dictates of the main regional powers, Australia
and New Zealand, which want the army to return to its barracks
so that a new regime can be fashioned that will be more amenable
to their interests.
The Australian-dominated Pacific Islands Forum originally set
up the EPG just before the December 5 coup to mediate the protracted
dispute between Qarase and the military chief, Commodore Voreqe
Bainimarama. The impasse centred on two proposed lawsan
amnesty bill for the perpetrators of the 2000 coup and legislation
to give traditional Fijian chiefs control over coastal lands.
Bainimarama finally carried out his threat to oust Qarases
government, forming a junta made up of the military, the Labour
Party, the National Alliance Party and various technocrats.
The EPG was comprised of Vanuatus deputy prime minister
Sato Kilman as chair, Samoas natural resources minister
Faumuina Liuga, Papua New Guineas retired chief justice
Arnold Amet and retired chief of the Australian Defence Forces,
Peter Cosgrove; who effectively called the shots.
The group visited Fiji at the end of January, interviewing
Bainimarama, Qarase and other political leaders. Its report is
to be considered by Pacific Islands Forum foreign affairs ministers
at a meeting on March 16 in Vanuatu, but was leaked to a Suva-based
news agency and subsequently posted on the Internet.
It is significant that the EPG report criticises every aspect
of the military regime except its proposed austerity budget due
on March 2, which will axe $F200 million, mostly through cuts
to the public sector. The report states, the Commanders
action seizing power on 5 December was illegal. The State
of Emergency was unwarranted and a major obstacle
to a return to normality and a resumption of the rule of law.
The report is couched in terms of a return to democracy,
but the reality is that its major proposals call for negotiations
to organise Qarases formal resignation so that President
Josefa Iloilo can form a new interim regime to organise elections
in two years time.
The EPG treads a fine line. Whilst condemning the coup for
threatening stability, at the same time it effectively endorses
the removal of the Qarase government, which came into some conflict
with Canberra.
Australia strongly opposed the coup, while seeking to exploit
the standoff between the military and Qarase to further its economic
and strategic interests in the South Pacific. In a bid to forestall
the coup, the Howard government stationed three warships just
outside Fijian territorial waters and secretly deployed military
personnel in Suva, violating Fijis sovereignty.
At the same time, Canberra was hostile to Qarases affirmative
action program, aimed at enriching the ethnic Fijian elite
through public subsidies, interest-free loans, exclusive land
rights and reserved shares in privatised public services and industries.
Qarases regime included open supporters of the 2000 coup
led by Fijian businessman George Speight and sections of the military,
who seized parliament and held the Labour government of Mahendra
Chaudhry hostage for several weeks. Bainimarama then stepped in
to appoint Qarase, a merchant banker known for his sympathies
with Fijian communal politics, as interim prime minister, a move
that was immediately endorsed by Australia and New Zealand.
Bainimarama later fell out with Qarase, opposing aspects of
his discriminatory policies for the ethnic Fijian elite. Today,
Bainimaramas program, including his clean-up campaign
against corruption and the promise to restructure the economy
in order to attract foreign investment, is attractive to the regional
powers.
On December 2 the foreign editor of the Australian,
Greg Sheridan, expressed Canberras dilemma on the eve of
the 2006 coup. He said there were plenty of arguments on
Bainimaramas side, except for the overwhelming argument
that he should not dismiss a democratically elected government.
Sheridan then went on to itemise why the Qarase Government
is undeniably smelly and vulnerable on many fronts. He describes
Qarase proposed amnesty for the 2000 coup plotters as profoundly
ill-advised, not to mention utterly offensive. But his real
concern was the Qarase governments proposed legislation
to give Fijian chiefs rights over foreshore areas, thus undermining
foreign investment, particularly in tourism.
Even though the EPG report calls for the military to renounce
its hold on the reins of government, there are definite signs
that Canberra may reach an accommodation with the junta, as it
did in 1987 with military head Sitiveni Rabuka who had ousted
the Labour government of Timoci Bavadra.
New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark immediately endorsed
the EPG report and highlighted the fact that Qarase would not
be returned: The report was not a call for a return to the
status quo but finding a way forward. Australian foreign
affairs minister Alexander Downer called on Bainimarama to implement
the reports findings.
At first, Bainimarama refused to comment on the report, saying
it was only proper for the Pacific Islands Forum foreign
ministers to consider the report first. Then on February 22, he
accused Australia and New Zealand of bullying tactics,
declaring: This clearly illustrates the insensitiveness
and total lack of understanding on part of these two dominant
powers within the Forum about the special circumstances, problems
and aspirations of the respective Pacific Island Countries.
The military regime has published its own roadmap
to parliamentary elections in 2010. It proposes to kick
start the national economy by restructuring the sugar industry.
Sugar still accounts for around $F200m annually in export revenuesabout
22 percent of total export earningsand provides a livelihood
to about 31 percent of the population.
But no formula has been established for the renewal of sugar
cane farm leases, held by mainly Indo-Fijian lessees from tribal
Fijian landholders. It has been estimated that 5,000 families
will abandon cane farming by 2008, if leases are not renewed,
leading to a further decline of about 1.8 percent in the countrys
GDP.
The military regimes March budget aims to slash the national
deficit to less than 2 percent of GDP, whereas Qarases last
budget forecast a debt level of 3.6 percent. The junta plans to
decimate the public service by reducing the retirement age from
60 to 55 years. Fiji Public Service Association general secretary
Rajeshwar Singh estimates that between 800 and 900 civil servants
will be removed, with an extra 487 from the Public Works Department
and 900 teachers.
Public sector wages will also be cut by 5 percent and the cost
of living allowance paid to public servants will be be waived.
These cuts will have a devastating effect on the living standards
of ordinary working people, which will inevitably lead to growing
dissatisfaction and opposition to the junta.
See Also:
Fiji's military junta strong-arms
its political opponents
[27 February 2007]
Fiji's army commander unveils
new military regime
[16 January 2007]
Fijian crisis drags
on as military delays formation of interim administration
[22 December 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |