|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Germany
Redistribution from the bottom to the top
German parliament cuts corporate taxes
By Dietmar Henning
27 March 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Two weeks ago, the German Bundestag (parliament) voted for
massive cuts to corporate taxes, with the support of all the government
parties: the Christian Democratic Union (CDU)/Christian Social
Union (CSU) and the Social Democratic Party (SPD). The cuts, which
are due to come into effect next year, will effectively hand over
at least 8 billion per year to German corporations.
Significantly, just a few days after the vote, the finance
ministry announced that it had collected billions of extra euros
in revenue from the increased value-added tax, which rose from
16 to 19 percent at the start of this year. The policy of the
German government could not be clearer: tax cuts for companies
are being financed by the general population. Take from below
and give it to the top.
From 2008, the company tax rate on retained earnings will fall
to just under 30 percent, down from the current 38.6 percent.
Tax on non-retained earnings will fall to just 15 percent from
the current 25 percent. In 1998, when the SPD-Green Party coalition
entered federal government, these rates were 40 percent and 30
percent, respectively. In other words, the most important levels
of company taxation have been more or less halved within 10 years.
Tax rates for partnership companies will also be slashed. Retained
earnings will be taxed at a flat rate of 28 percent. At present,
their earnings are taxed according to a progressive tax scale
from 15 to 42 percent. This means a huge windfall for those partnerships
that record high earnings and profits.
The introduction of a new compensation tax will replace existing
taxes on investment income. Interest, dividends and private profits
from the sale of shares will also be taxed at a flat rate of 25
percent from 2009. These forms of income are also currently taxed
according to a sliding scale, meaning that high profits from the
sale of shares attract the highest rate of 42 percent.
These huge tax cuts were not enough, however, to satisfy the
appetites of corporations. German industry insistently
warned the German government of endangering Germany as a research
centre. The tax bill (which has yet to be passed by Germanys
upper house of parliament, the Bundesrat) also includes measures
to increase taxes for companies that have operations, patents
and licences outside of Germany. If this occurs, no one
will invest in German research any more, threatened a tax
expert from Siemens, Werner Stuffer, at a meeting of the Federation
of German Industries (BDI) two weeks ago. The tax manager from
BASF made similar remarks.
The day before the BDI meeting, German Chancellor Angela Merkel
(CDU) had already announced changes to the draft legislation in
order to avoid damaging research in Germany.
Economic Minister Michael Glos (CSU) in turn criticised the
bill for disadvantaging smaller companies and made a point of
having his objection noted in the minutes of the cabinet meeting
that approved the legislation. CDU/CSU parliamentary fraction
leader Michael Meister told the Financial Times Deutschland:
In the course of the bills passage through parliament,
we want to see what we can do to assist medium-sized companies.
When the intention to reform company taxation was announced
last year, Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück (SPD) calculated
that the measures would reduce federal government income by 5
billion per year until 2010. This figure has since proven to be
anything but accurate. According to the calculations of the Quantification
Group, comprised of tax representatives from federal, state and
local governments, the income tax loss in the first year would
be 8 billion. The loss for each of the subsequent two years
would be just under 7 billion. It would only be in 2011
that the tax gift to companies would reduce federal income tax
receipts by 5 billion.
According to other estimates, the revenue loss would be even
greater. Tax expert professor Lorenz Jarass computes revenue lost
due to the tax cuts to be in the order of at least 10 billion
per year.
Whichever figure is correct, one thing is certain: companies
are being handed billions of euros by the federal government.
Recent announcements by the finance ministry itself on the state
of current tax revenues show exactly how this corporate tax gift
is to be funded: from the taxes paid by the masses of ordinary
working people.
At the beginning of last week, Steinbrücks ministry
announced that in February 2007, 5 billion more (16.7 percent)
was received in tax revenue than for the same month in 2006. In
January 2007, the government received 13 percent more in tax revenue
than in January 2006. According to current estimates, the increase
in income for the entire year will be more than 15 billion
above what was originally estimated.
The biggest source of tax revenue for the government, the value-added
tax, is proving especially fruitful for the government. At the
start of 2007, the federal government increased this tax from
16 to 19 percent. In February 2007, the income from value-added
tax increased by nearly 23 percent to 16.6 billion compared
to February 2006. Income tax from wages and salary earners is
the second biggest source of government income. Last month, it
contributed almost 10 billion to tax coffers.
According to Steinbrück, value-added tax revenue will
increase by 20 billion this year compared to last year.
The corporate tax cuts will mean that approximately half of this
will then be handed over to businesses.
A continuation of the SPD-Green policy
There was a reason why, after the federal elections in 2005,
the SPD wanted to retain the most important ministries of finance,
health, employment and social security. This allowed the SPD to
continue the policies it had implemented during its previous seven
years in government in coalition with the Green Party. In 2001,
Steinbrücks predecessor Hans Eichel (SPD) introduced
the so-called century reform, which implemented the
largest reduction in taxes for the rich and companies since the
founding of the federal republic after World War II.
Then, as now, the SPD justifies the tax cuts on the basis of
increasing the international competitiveness of German companies,
which would then, as the argument goes, increase investment and
create more jobs.
Our firms will therefore remain internationally competitive,
explained Steinbrück shortly before he introduced the current
tax cuts. Apart from that, Germany as a business location
will be more interesting for new investors. Steinbrück
said that in the United Kingdom, France, and above all the eastern
European countries, corporate taxes are far lower than in Germany.
In order to allow German companies to remain competitive against
those in neighbouring countries (which are often the subsidiaries
of the same German companies), Steinbrück argues that taxes
must be lowered.
In reality, company and investment tax rates in Germany, while
nominally just above some other countries, are actually below
the international average. According to a study by the EU Commission
in 2006, the rate of taxation actually paid for the 2003 calendar
year in Germany was 17.4 percent. In comparison, the rate for
the other 15 old EU member states was 20.2 percent.
The rate for all EU countries, including the new eastern European
low-tax states, was 17.7 percent.
According to the calculations of Lorenz Jarass, only 16 percent
of company profits are currently being collected in taxes, not
even half the nominal rate.
Ninety percent of all German small businesses are currently
paying less than 30 percent tax. Three quarters of them are paying
less than 15 percent. German taxation laws can be summed up by
the following rule: the bigger the company, the lower the tax
it pays.
In 2001, the SPD-Green coalition government introduced generous
rules to allow companies to offset profits through previous losses
and therefore not pay any tax at all. Instead of a reduction of
government tax receipts of 8 billion (the governments
estimate), these rules resulted in a total reduction of more than
20 billion. In 2001, the government even had to pay 400
million back to companies.
Large companies have made record profits every year thereafter.
Typically, announcements of record profits are followed shortly
after by announcements of mass sackings, in an attempt to satisfy
the unquenchable thirst of shareholders and dividend recipients.
According to the finance ministry, the various cuts to company
taxes since 1998 have resulted in an average yearly decrease in
tax receipts of 11 billion. However, this figure does not
include the aforementioned catastrophic cut in company income
tax from 2001.
Mass unemployment continues to afflict German society, with
more than 4 million people unemployed. The so-called turn in the
employment market, which has seen a reduction in the official
numbers of unemployed, is not as rosy as the picture painted by
the Department of Employment and the federal government. Although
the number of unemployed is almost a million less than the figure
of one year ago, the number of persons employed increased by just
550,000. This means that many jobless persons have simply been
struck from the statistics.
If one looks at the half million new jobs, the picture is even
more gloomy. Half of these new jobs are temporary positions, where
wages are lower and workers can be instantly dismissed without
complications.
During its two terms in office, the SPD-Green government concentrated
on employment reforms (enacted through the series of Hartz laws),
above all to create a cheap labour sector. Last year, approximately
700,000 people had to work for one-euro jobsa
creation of the SPD-Green government whereby the long-term unemployed
receiving benefits are forced to work at jobs provided by the
state paying just one euro per hour.
During the first two months of this year, 128,000 people had
to accept these jobs, 22 percent more than in the same period
last year.
At the end of 2006, the number of workers in Germany engaged
in mini-jobstemporary and part-time positions
with a maximum wage of 400 per monthwas 6.3 million.
Although this number has remained constant in the recent period,
the number of workers working in private homes has risen dramatically.
In December 2006, they numbered 131,000, 20 percent more than
in the previous yearthe return of the housemaid!
When Steinbrück justifies the plunging of taxes based
on international competition, he is only telling half the story.
The federal government is not only a victim of international competition,
but also a driving force. Its plans to further reduce company
taxes will only lead to a heating up of tax dumping:
other countries will use the same argumentation to lower their
company tax rates, and, when its turn comes again, the German
government will use this once more to justify yet another round
of corporate tax cuts.
See Also:
The Forbes list of billionaires:
Wealth piles up for the German elite
[22 March 2007]
Deutsche Telekom to outsource 55,000
jobs: Increased working hours and wage cuts
[13 March 2007]
Germany: New university tuition fees
threaten students with poverty
[10 March 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |