|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : Canada
Quebec elections: Right-wing populist ADQ benefits from mass
disaffection with establishment
By Keith Jones
28 March 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Mondays Quebec election shattered the political framework
that has prevailed in Canadas sole majority French-speaking
province for the past three decades.
Both of the parties that have alternated as Quebecs government
since the early 1970sthe federalist Parti Libéral
du Québec (PLQ) and the indépendantiste Parti
Québécois (PQ)suffered stunning losses in
terms of both seats and popular vote.
The Action Démocratique du Québec (ADQ), a right-wing
populist party that didnt even have official party status
in the National Assembly prior to Mondays vote, will now
form Quebecs official opposition.
For the moment, the Liberals of Jean Charest, who were first
elected to office in April 2003, retain the reins of power, but
it is a weak minority government. Weak because of the extent of
the Liberal losses, but also because of the breadth of the ADQs
gains. The Liberals captured just seven more seats than the ADQ48
to 41 in a 125-member National Assemblyand only polled just
over 100,000 more votes than the ADQ.
In Mondays election, the Liberals share of the
popular vote was slashed by 13 percentage points, from 46 percent
in 2003 to 33 percent, and the number of Liberal legislators was
cut by 25. Four Liberal cabinet ministers failed to win re-election.
The election dealt an even more crushing blow to the PQ, which
fell from power in 2003 after nine years in office. During most
of the past four years opinion polls indicated that the PQ was
poised to return to power when Quebecers next went to the polls.
But it has now been reduced to third-party status in terms of
both seats and popular vote.
At the National Assemblys dissolution, the PQ held 45
seats. Now it has 36.
In the 2003 election, the PQs share of the popular vote
plunged, as the number of Quebecers who voted for the indépendantiste
party fell by half a million. On Monday the hemorrhaging continued.
The PQs share of the popular vote fell by a further five
percentage points, to 28.3 percent. Only in 1970, two years after
the PQ had been born from a split inside the PLQ, did it ever
win a smaller share of the popular vote.
While Charest is likely to remain at the helm of the Liberal
Party, at least in the near-term, the press was rife the morning
after the election with speculation that PQ leader André
Boisclair, who had been touted as a youthful, telegenic leader,
will soon come under great pressure from within the PQ to step
down.
The election results constitute a massive popular repudiation
of Quebecs traditional big business parties. Together the
PLQ and PQ won barley 60 percent of the votes cast. But if you
include the close to 30 percent of the electorate who didnt
votea near-record abstention ratethe establishment
parties won the endorsement of just 44 percent of the electorate.
A dramatic swing right
The Quebec and Canadian ruling elite are seizing on the electoral
upheaval in Quebec to push for a dramatic swing to the right.
They view it as providing them with the occasion to launch a new
assault on public and social services, to further redistribute
wealth to big business and the most privileged sections of society
through tax cuts, and to press forward with a predatory, militaristic
foreign policy aimed at asserting the interests of Canadian capital
on the world stage.
Canadas minority Conservative government, which has emerged
as one of Bushs staunchest international allies, has viewed
the Charest Liberal government as an important, if not its most
important, provincial ally.
Charest called the elections only after intensive consultations
with Prime Minister Harper and his aides. Harper plotted to secure
Charests re-election by announcing an increase in federal
transfer payments to Quebec in a federal budget timed for the
last week of the campaign. He then hoped to use the political
momentum generated by Charests defeat of the indépendantiste
PQ to make a bid to win a parliamentary majority in a spring
federal election.
The Conservatives are anxious for an early election because
they recognize that there is only a narrow base of support for
their neo-liberal and militarist agenda. Their hope is to bamboozle
their way to a majority by camouflaging their full agenda and
by employing the politics of scandal and provocation.
Whilst unexpected, the sudden rise of the ADQ is seen by Harper
and his Conservatives as greatly favoring their push to radically
redesign Canada in favor of the corporate elite. After all, ADQ
Mario Dumont boasts that he voted for Harper in the last federal
election. The ADQ and the Quebec-wing of the Conservatives also
share many organizers and activists, and the ADQs right-wing
populist program parallels that of Preston Mannings Reform
Partythe party in which Harper cut his political teeth and
which constitutes one of the two major components of the current-day
federal Conservative Party.
A jubilant Harper proclaimed Tuesday, [W]e have a government
opposed to a referendum [on Quebec independence] and an Official
Opposition opposed to a referendum. ... This is a great result
for Canada.
The media pundits, meanwhile, have gone into overdrive to depict
the Quebec election results as indicative of a massive and deep-rooted
popular shift to the right. The ADQ, we are told, is the genuine
voice of Quebec, at least of Quebec outside the multi-ethnic metropolis
of Montreal.
Dumont, in his victory speech Monday night, claimed the election
was a cri de coeur of the people. Later he made an
oblique reference to the right-wing policies he will push for
as head of the official opposition, calling for the modernization
of the Quebec state, a code-word for privatization and social
spending cuts, and a mixed health care system, that
is the dismantling of a quality universal public health care system.
In reality, Mondays election results are much more revealing
of a sharp swing to the right on the part of the Quebec bourgeoisie
than of working people.
The Charest Liberal government implemented a raft of right-wing
policies. It amended the labor code to facilitate contracting
out, raised public day care fees and auto insurance and electricity
rates, imposed by decree seven-year, wage-cutting contracts on
half a million public sector workers, and adopted legislation
providing a mechanism through which for-profit, private health
care can rapidly be expanded in Quebec.
Yet the Charest government was harshly criticized by big business
for failing to carry through a pledge to slash personal income
taxes by $1 billion per year, or $15 billion over 5 years, and
more generally for not pressing forward with unpopular policies
aimed at making Quebec more profitable to investors. The dismay
within the elite at the popular resistance to their right-wing
agenda was typified by a manifesto, For a Clear-Eyed Quebec,
issued by prominent federalists and indépendantistes,
including former PQ premier Lucien Bouchard, and which complained
of immobilisme (paralysis) and popular antipathy to
business.
That is why, when the corporate media saw that Dumont, whose
ADQ was recording just 12 percent support in the opinion polls
last fall, was succeeding in tapping into the popular hostility
to the establishment parties that have presided over increasing
economic insecurity and social polarization in the past two decades,
they lavished attention on the ADQ. Especially noxious was the
legitimacy the media and, subsequently the PQ and PLQ, gave to
Dumonts chauvinist demagogyto his claims that Quebec
has been far too accommodating to immigrants and religious minorities.
Dumont for his part had previously moved to shore up business
support, by recruiting Gilles Taillon, the former head of the
Conseil du patronat du Québec, the provinces principal
employer lobby group, as an ADQ vice-president and his second-in-command.
Even from a narrow electoral standpoint, the claims of an ADQ
wave are greatly exaggerated, and not only because many of those
who voted for the ADQ said they were doing so because they wanted
to make a protest against the political establishment.
Little more than one in five Quebecers voted for the ADQ. While
the ADQ admittedly gained half a million votes, parties that portrayed
themselves as being to the left of the PQ and PLQ, the Green Party
and Quebec Solidaire, won some 250,000 votes more than they or
their predecessors did in 2003, for a combined total of just under
8 percent of the popular vote.
That said, the results of Mondays election do underscore
the urgency of the working class breaking with the politics of
the nationalist, pro-capitalist trade union bureaucracy, which
for decades has served as one of the chief bulwarks of the PQ,
and charting a new course.
The shift to the right in the Quebec National Assembly be used
to intensify the big business offensive against the social position
of the working class and democratic rights across Canada. Right-wing
chauvinist politics that scapegoat minorities have also been given
a new legitimacy. That Muslims have been specially targeted is
a not an incidental question under conditions where the Canadian
elite is trying to justify Canadas participation in imperialist
wars by citing the need to emancipate Muslim women.
If the ADQ, with the assistance of the corporate media, was
able to tap into and manipulate the anger and frustration of working
people at the establishment, it is because the trade union bureaucracy
has completely disenfranchised the working class and suppressed
its attempts to challenge the assault on jobs, wages, worker rights
and social and public services.
The Charest government was roiled by mass social protests,
first in December 2003 when demonstrations and strikes erupted
across the province against a series of right-wing measures and
then in the spring of 2005 by a weeks-long student strike. In
both instances, the trade union leaders stepped in to torpedo
the opposition movement, saying they wanted to ensure social
peace.
Just as important was the unions direct participation
in the massive program of social spending cuts carried out by
the Parizeau-Bouchard-Landry PQ government of 1994-2003.
Undoubtedly the union leadership will respond to the rise of
the ADQ by proposing to increase their collaboration with the
big business PQ and PLQ.
Nationalism has served to divide workers in Quebec from their
class brothers and sisters in English Canada, the US and around
the world and to subordinate them to the PQ and its reactionary
project of creating an independent capitalist Quebec. Now it has
provided a political opening for the right-wing populist ADQ to
manipulate the popular anger and frustration generated by the
social crisis produced by the profit system.
The experience of workers in Quebec over the past quarter-century
is fundamentally the same as that of workers around the world.
The old nationally-oriented unions and social democratic parties
have become instruments through which capital increases ever-more
the exploitation of the working class. To defeat globally organized
transnational corporations and prevent the world being dragooned
into a series of escalating predatory wars among the various,
rival nationally-based capitalist cliques, workers must adopt
a socialist-internationalist strategy that aims to mobilize the
international working class against the subordination of socio-economic
life to private profit and the outmoded nation-state system.
See Also:
Quebec state yields to right-wing provocation
on eve of provincial election
[26 March 2007]
Parti Quebecois stumbles through Quebec
election campaign
[26 March 2007]
Quebec elections 2007: Quebec Federation
of Labour officially backs Parti Québécois
[14 March 2007]
The March 26 Quebec elections and the
Canadian elites turn to the right
[6 March 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |