|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
US jobless rate increases
Falling employment, stagnant wages fuel US corporate profits
By Jerry White
5 May 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Non-farm employment in the US rose by only 88,000 jobs in April,
far lower than the 110,000 jobs expected by economists and the
slowest rate in more than two years, according to a Labor Department
report released Friday. The official jobless rate rose by 0.1
percent to 4.5 percent last month and would have been even higher
if more than 339,000 workers had not fallen out of the job market
in April due to the lack of decent employment opportunities.
The Labor Department also made a downward revision of its job
estimate for Marchthe second reduction in a row. The weakening
job market, along with a collapse in the housing market and the
weakest first quarter Gross Domestic Product growth in four years,
has prompted some analysts to suggest that the six-year expansion
of the US economy has come to an end and that a recession may
be around the corner.
The lower than expected employment growth was welcomed on Wall
Street because economic insecurity for workers tends to suppress
their demands for higher wages, an outcome that will allow corporations
to continue to accrue record-breaking profits. Average weekly
earnings fell 0.1 percent in April and over the year, average
hourly and weekly earnings grew by only 3.7 and 3.4 percent, respectively.
One analyst from Insight Economics said the US Federal
Reserve Board would like to see a gradual upward drift in
the unemployment rate to about five percent to reduce the
pressure on inflation, using the common euphemism for rising
wages.
With wage increases in check, the Federal Reserve, which is
scheduled to meet next Wednesday, is not expected to raise interest
rates, a measure it could take to drive up unemployment further.
Layoffs jumped 44 percent in April, led by a surge in financial
sector job cuts after Citigroup announced it would eliminate 17,000
positions, according to Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc.,
an employment consulting firm.
Announced layoffs totaled 70,672 in April, up from 48,997 in
March and about 18 percent more than the 59,688 announced in the
same month a year earlier. The financial sector now leads all
others in job cuts for the year, with 50,221. The automotive sector
ranked second with 27,570 announced job cuts this year, Challenger
said.
Financial sector cuts in April included more than 6,000 resulting
from a weak housing market and its impact on mortgage lenders,
Challenger said.
This week, sub-prime lender New Century Financial Corp.which
declared bankruptcy in Marchwill lay off about 2,000 of
its employees after failing to find a buyer for its mortgage loan
origination business, according to an Associated Press report.
Construction firms, hard hit by the slowdown in new housing
starts, eliminated 11,000 jobs in April. The drop in construction
employment is only the beginning, according to analysts who point
out that the layoff of finish carpenters, electricians, plumbers
and others is lagging behind the decline in housing starts, which
only intensified after mid-2006. Despite
the drop in construction, theres a lot more to go in this
sector, a Goldman Sachs analyst said. The 11,000 decline
pales in comparison to the hundreds of thousands of layoffs that
would be needed to bring payrolls in this sector in line with
reduced levels of output.
Industrial jobs continued to be slashed in April. The Labor
Department reported that manufacturing firms cut 19,000 jobs in
the tenth straight decline in employment. Machinery companies
cut 5,000 jobs, motor vehicles another 5,000 and textile mills
3,000.
May began with new job loss announcements. Intel will
lay off as many as 1,000 workers when it stops producing flash
memory chips at a fabrication plant in New Mexico this August.
IBM laid off 1,315 US workers from its global
services division.
The cutback in jobs has coincided with a drive by employers
to speed up the output of workers who remain on the job. US productivity
grew much more sharply than expected in the first quarter, despite
the slowdown in economic activity. This included a 2.7 percent
rise in manufacturing productivity.
The increase in output, along with the stagnation of wages,
allowed employers to keep the increase in unit labor costs to
just 0.6 percent, following a 6.2 percent rise the previous quarter.
Hours worked fell 0.3 percent in the January to March period,
the sharpest drop since the second quarter of 2003. Hourly compensation
increased 2.3 percent, well below the rate of inflation. In real
terms, compensation actually fell by 1.5 percent.
While conditions for American workers continued to worsen,
Wall Street continues to celebrate massive corporate profits.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 23.24 points to 13264.62
for its fourth straight record close and the Dows 23rd gain
in the past 26 sessionsthe longest run of its kind since
1944. The central stock market index is up 6.4 percent since the
beginning of the year.
The disconnect between booming corporate profits and stock
prices on the one hand and the general economic malaise on the
other has been the subject of commentary by some more perceptive
economists. New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, for
example, pointed to a recent speech by one of the Bush administrations
top economists, who repeated the often-made claim that higher
profits lead to greater investment, high rates of productivity
and rising living standards.
In fact, Krugman wrote, high profits had not led to high investment
and rising productivity had not led to rising wages. Since
President Bush took office, the combination of rising productivity
and stagnant wagesworkers are producing more, but they arent
getting paid morehas led to a veritable profit gusher, with
corporate profits more than doubling since 2000. Krugman
further pointed out that profits as a share of national income
in 2006 were at the highest level ever recorded.
However, rather than investing in physical capitalmachinery,
factories, research, and so onKrugman pointed out, many
companies are using profits to buy back their own stock in order
to facilitate a temporary rise in stock prices, increasing the
value of executives stock options, even at the detriment
of the long-term health of the company.
See Also:
Corporate asset strippers vie for Chrysler
[4 May 2007]
US economic growth slows as
housing bubble deflates
[28 April 2007]
Top hedge-fund managers average
$540 million in income
[27 April 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |