|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: East
Timor
East Timor: final round of presidential elections
By Patrick OConnor
9 May 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The second and final round of voting in the East Timorese presidential
election is being held today amid allegations that Australian
troops have been carrying out provocations. On May 6, Fretilin
candidate Francisco Lu-Olo Guterres released a press
statement condemning Australian troops disruption of two
Fretilin rallies, one in the capital Dili on May 5 and another
in the central town of Ainaro on May 3. Helicopters landed close
to the rallies and heavily armed troops moved among the crowds.
The [Australian-led International Stabilisation Force]
ISF military behaved in a heavy-handed and intimidatory way towards
our supporters, Guterress spokesman Jose Manuel Fernandes
stated. The ISF should not be frightening and intimidating
an entirely peaceful election gathering... We are not convinced
that there is no connection between the troops behaviour
and the Australian governments apparent support for Jose
Ramos-Horta.
Fernandes added that Fretilin received daily complaints from
its supporters of harassment and intimidation by Australian troops.
The ruling party has also raised questions about an incident in
which an Australian rifle was left lying in the street. Why
was this weapon lying on the ground? former prime minister
and Fretilin secretary-general Mari Alkatiri asked. Was
it a trap? We dont know.
The Australian military denied any provocation, claiming rather
lamely that the weapon fell from a vehicle and was later recovered.
Brigadier Mal Rerden, Australian military commander in East Timor,
also rejected Fretilins accusations that his personnel had
interfered with election rallies and claimed that no soldier came
closer than 50 metres to the meetings. Video and camera footage,
however, clearly shows Australian troops on patrol in the middle
of large crowds.
While claiming to be neutral, Canberra is tacitly backing Ramos-Horta,
who in the first round of voting held last month received 22 percent
of the vote, behind Fretilin candidate Francisco Lu-Olo
Guterres who won 29 percent. After deploying hundreds of soldiers
to the impoverished territory in May last year and orchestrating
the removal of Alkatiri as prime minister, the Australian government
is determined to engineer a favourable outcome in the presidential
election and the parliamentary vote due later this year.
Canberra views Fretilin as an obstacle to its economic and
strategic interests. The Alkatiri government had forced the Howard
government to issue a number of limited but nevertheless unwelcome
concessions on its exploitation of the Greater Sunrise oil and
gas reserves in the Timor Sea. No less important was Fretilins
relations with countries such as Portugal and China, regarded
by Australia as rivals. Having dispatched troops to East Timor
in 1999 in order to protect its interests during the transition
to so-called independence from Indonesia, Canberra is not prepared
to be sidelined by other powers in the resource-rich and strategically
significant region.
Last years military intervention was centrally aimed
at removing Alkatiri, who was finally forced to make way for Ramos-Horta
after the Australian Broadcasting Corporations Four
Corners program broadcast baseless allegations that the
Fretilin prime minister had armed a hit squad to assassinate
his political opponents. Alkatiri resigned soon after Australian
troops landed in East Timor, but Fretilin still retained a large
parliamentary majority. With Ramos-Horta now running for president,
outgoing President Xanana Gusmao has formed a new right-wing political
party and aims to form a coalition government of anti-Fretilin
parties following parliamentary elections scheduled to be held
on June 30.
While the Howard government has targeted Fretilin for removal,
the ruling party does not represent the genuine interests of the
East Timorese working class and rural poor. Fretilin represents
the interests of a layer of the countrys ruling elite that
has sought to manoeuvre between Canberras demands and the
competing interests of rival European and Asian powers, while
simultaneously wooing foreign investors by implementing the dictates
of the International Monetary Fund.
An IMF report released last February praised the post-independence
Fretilin government for its efficient public spending
and outstanding track record of fiscal soundness.
In other words, wages have been suppressed and spending on health,
education and other social services kept to a minimum. Fretilins
economic program has made a mockery of its pre-1999 promises to
improve life in an independent East Timor. The country
remains among the worlds poorest, with widespread unemployment
and tens of thousands living in internally displaced peoples
camps.
Hostility toward Australian troops has escalated, particularly
as military operations have become increasingly aggressive. In
February this year, for example, Australian soldiers shot dead
two East Timorese men who were protesting the forced closure of
a refugee camp near Dili airport. Fretilin has made a very limited
and carefully targetted appeal to anti-Australian sentiment by
stressing its support for national sovereignty and
issuing widely publicised complaints of Australian military interference
in its campaign work. This appeal is entirely hypocritical, however,
as Fretilin backed the initial intervention in May last year and
does not call on Australian troops to leave. Ramos-Horta has nevertheless
accused the party of running an anti-Australian election
campaign and warned of chaos if foreign forces leave.
The collapse in much of Fretilins support base has allowed
Ramos-Horta to posture as a president for the poor.
However, Ramos-Hortas proposed economic program is centrally
aimed at removing all impediments and barriers to the accumulation
of profit, by turning East Timor into another Hong Kong
through the elimination of virtually all taxes. The presidential
candidate has sought to camouflage this right-wing pro-business
agenda by demagogically denouncing Fretilins failure to
spend more of the countrys oil and gas revenues to resolve
poverty and unemployment.
In the month since the first round of voting, Ramos-Horta has
engaged in a series of manoeuvres aimed at winning the support
of the six losing candidates. Last month he announced he was calling
off the Australian militarys pursuit of rebel
military leader Alfredo Reinado. Reinado, a highly dubious figure
with close connections to the Australian military, played a major
role in last years unrest after he mutinied and attacked
forces loyal to the government. Shortly after the announcement,
Fernando La Sama de Araujo publicly backed Ramos-Hortas
campaign and openly acknowledged the Reinado quid pro quo.
The cynical deal underscored Ramos-Hortas determination
to mobilise the most reactionary forces in East Timorese society
behind his campaign. Prior to the first round of voting, De Araujo
had been endorsed by Reinado and sections of the powerful Catholic
Church. He also has close ties with elements connected to pro-Indonesian
militias and Indonesian special forces. During last years
unrest that preceded the Australian military intervention, he
organised joint demonstrations with these layers aimed at bringing
down the Alkatiri government.
Another dubious figure, Vicente Railos da Conceicao,
has openly campaigned for Ramos-Horta. Railoss allegation
that Alkatiri had asked him to lead the hit squad was central
to the Four Corners program that was used to force
the Fretilin prime minister out. Railoss transformation
from a supposed pro-Fretilin hitman to an anti-Fretilin politician
has never been adequately explained.
A subsequent UN investigation recommended that Railos be prosecuted
for his participation in an attack on East Timorese soldiers last
May and for the illegal possession, use, and movement
of weapons. A Fretilin statement released on April 30 accused
Railos of working as Ramos-Hortas principal campaigner
in the town of Liquica and of visiting the prime ministers
office and meeting with an advisor on investment,
Chris Santos, an Australian national. Ramos-Horta issued a press
release in reply, which did not deny any of the allegations and
instead repeated the hit squad allegations against Alkatiri.
That an individual who Ramos-Horta alleges was the ring-leader
of a government-sponsored assassination unit is now playing a
prominent role in Ramos-Hortas election campaign raises
further serious questions regarding the events of April-May 2006.
All the evidence indicates that the unrest and the allegations
against the Alkatiri governmententhusiastically promoted
in the Australian mediawere calculated provocations aimed
at overthrowing the Fretilin government, orchestrated by right-wing
sections of the East Timorese ruling elite, possibly with Canberras
active assistance.
The Howard government can be expected to continue its manoeuvres
in East Timor irrespective of who becomes president. The Australian
media has presented the election as a virtual foregone conclusion,
unanimously predicting that Ramos-Horta will defeat Guterres.
Five of the six losing first round candidates have backed Ramos-Horta,
but the outcome remains highly uncertain, particularly as it is
unclear whether these candidates supporters will turn out
in large numbers today. The Australian media coverage serves as
a pre-emptive move against a Fretilin victoryif Ramos-Horta
loses, allegations of vote rigging and corruption will no doubt
be widely promoted, opening the door for a legal challenge to
the outcome.
See Also:
East Timor: Hunt for rebel
military leader called off
[20 April 2007]
Uncertain East Timorese presidential
election outcome foreshadows further instability
[13 April 2007]
East Timor: Presidential election
campaign held under ongoing Australian occupation
[9 April 2007]
Australian troops escalate
repression in East Timor
[13 March 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |