|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Striking television writers discuss political issues with
the WSWS
By Andrea Peters
15 November 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
On Wednesday morning, reporters from the World Socialist
Web Site spoke with writers and actors walking the picket
lines at Disney and Warner Brothers studios in Burbank, California.
J.D. Mendonca, a young actor who recently moved to Los Angeles,
had come out to offer his support for the writers.

I moved out here a couple of weeks ago and I made a short
of list of people that inspire me and that Id like to work
withwriters, actors, directorsand I was surprised
to see that the majority of people on the list were writers,
he said.
Like many of his colleagues, he anticipated that the strike
would go on for some time.
A lot of shows are going to be repeats in December and
into January anyway because of the holiday season, and so I think
that the possible pressure that would be there, if there was still
a strike in late January, for example, isnt there right
now, he commented.
Jeff Vlaming, who writes for Reaper on the CW network,
felt there was a lot of solidarity within the Writers Guild and
among Hollywood artists in general.
Our numbers on the picket line havent flagged at
all. I know its only the second week, but I think its
indicative of how much everyone in the Guild believes in what
were fighting for, said Vlaming.
Speaking about the number of film and television personalities
who showed up yesterday on the picket line at Universal Studios
to support the writers, he noted, There was a big turnout
of Screen Actors Guild members. They were walking along with us
here yesterday too. They were at the huge rally at Fox last Friday.
A lot of those were actors. The president of the Screen Actors
Guild was at the podium and gave a rousing speech. So its
really great to have the solidarity of that union as well.
When asked about the major issues in the strike and the Writers
Guild leaderships decision to pull the demand for greater
compensation on DVD residuals, Vlaming appeared ruffled.
That was somewhat of a surprise to me personally,
he said, because I didnt see that as an issue that
was taken off the table lightly. Nor was it. He continued:
I think the important issue is this new media thing that
no one can quite define and that the studios want to take three
years to define. Theyre already making boat-loads of money
off that, and so they make three more years of moneyand
then theyre going to work this out with us and retroactively
give us our fair share for the three years that we waited? I dont
think so.
If we give them three years to figure out what this new
media is all aboutwell, right now theyre fudging numbers
theyre presenting to us. Their numbers are going to be no
less fudged in three years. Its not like three years of
mass revenue is going to suddenly make them honest. Theyre
going to be the same duplicitous, money-grubbing, very greedy
jerks that they are now in three years, commented Vlaming.
He went on to talk about how the domination of the industry
by a handful of media conglomerates affects the economic and creative
environment for writers.
A lot of people compare this to the 88 strike.
But it is a very different world than it was in 1988 because the
entertainment companies werent owned by giant corporations
where the entertainment business was only one of their facets.
Now, if that line of business is hurting, the corporation as a
whole doesnt get affected.
I think the corporations are not as prone to listen to
what we feel are fair demands because theyve got very deep
pockets and they can wait it out. Creatively, it also dictates
the product itself. Televisionand were all TV writers
hereis going to tend to be less adventurous and creative,
and it will be even more about getting key demographics to sell
more advertising revenueto create more revenue for the parent
company, for the corporation that owns the TV network. This kind
of corporate ownership of networks and studios tends to hobble
creative output of writers, actors and directors.
I currently write for Reaper, which is on
the CW network. It is hugely successful. Ratings-wise, CW is a
small network, but were maintaining an audience and we think
that is the key to success. Its been hugely popular, from
the New York Times all the way down. So you think youre
OK if you can get behind that. But if its not creating revenue,
who knows what the future holds? Because thats the bottom
line, unfortunately, said Vlaming.
.jpg)
This writer was also disillusioned by the official political
establishment and the role of the Democrats. I asked him what
he thought about the fact that the top three Democratic Party
would-be presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama
and John Edwards, issued statements expressing support for the
writers, when they receive millions of dollars in campaign financing
from the entertainment industry.
Thats a whole other conversation that could go
on for hours, said Vlaming. I mean, its politics
as usual in that you have to placate both sides. It would be so
great if John Edwards or Barack Obama or Hillary showed up in
LA and said, OK, Im going to mediate this, as a senator.
I know Im running for president but I know this is important.
But theyre not going to do that, I know, because
theyre on the campaign trail. In the meantime they support
it [the strike], they say were on the side of the
striking writers, but they also have to be cozy with the
corporations. Its the same way with other issues, like health
care. They say, This is my health care plan. We need health
care for the masses, but I will happily take this contribution
from you, the pharmaceutical giants. So its hypocrisy
and its just unfortunate that its part and parcel
of politics. It doesnt seem to be any different as applied
to our situation, our cause here.
Vlamings fellow writer, the strike captain at one of
the gates on the Disney studio lot, did not share his skepticism
towards the Democrats. He was of the opinion that the posturing
of Clinton, Obama, and Edwards was an expression of genuine support.
I look at this unfortunately from one side and one side
only, and that is the writers side. And I dont know
if youve noticed, but after the first day or two of the
strike, our press coverage has gone way down. People in the press,
the media companies, are owned by the same people that were
negotiating against and our story isnt getting out there.
So the truth is that if people we can support turn around
and support us in return, I think thats a wonderful thing.
We buy into a lot of what the Democratic Party speaks
for. I think a lot of artists do. I think its just kind
of our way. Were liberal. I think its nice to see
that after we give to them, they give back. I find it to be very
positive because a lot of times in this cynical world you would
think that a politician, even a Democratic one, wouldnt
pick sides because it puts you out on a limb, because the producers
are the ones with more money. If they speak up for the writers,
which is really speaking up against the AMPTP [Alliance of Motion
Picture and Television Producers], hopefully that says to the
public that [the writers] must be saying something important,
otherwise they wouldnt risk alienating the biggest money
in Hollywood, which is what theyre doing by standing at
our side, he said.
Such a view fails to take into account the class character
of the Democratic Party and the way it functions in American society.
The Democrats represent one wing of the corporate elite; their
specific role is to present themselves as the party of the average
man and woman and thus help prevent the emergence of a politically
independent working class movement. The meaningless expressions
of support for the writers from Clinton, Obama and Edwards illustrate
that role perfectly. The presidential candidates make an empty
populist gesture, which costs them nothing, even as
they continue to woo the Hollywood moguls who finance their campaigns.
There is no sense in which they are going out on a limb.
This strike captain, who described himself as a feature film
writer, did think the aim of the AMPTP was to provoke the Writers
Guild into a walk-out.
If you look at the situation closely you cant help
but come to the conclusion that they wanted us to strike. We could
almost say that we got forced into striking, he said.
And then you have to ask yourself why the corporations
did this. I dont want to go out on a limb and I have my
own theories, but they are only personal theories. But as things
play out, there is going to be a lot of force majeuring
[voiding contracts due to the strike] of people, not just writers,
but I think there is going to be a lot of force majeuring of people
on the lot. And the AMPTP, which claims to represent these producers,
is actually going to end up securing them getting thrown off the
lot, he continued.
The strike captain began our conversation by placing emphasis
on the DVD residuals question:
Whats not getting a lot of coverage, for example,
is that the Writers Guild of Great Britain gets 5.6 percent of
DVD revenue. We right now get 0.3 percent and were asking
for 0.6. We came to the table with very reasonable demands, I
believe. We want nothing more than to work out a reasonable deal
with the producers, because they are our partners in filmmaking.
Theyre the brains of business and were the brains
of the creative.
When I asked about the fact that the guild leadership pulled
the DVD demand from the table, he defended the actions of the
union.
I understand that the future is new media. In 10 years
I honestly believe that DVDs are going to go the way of VHS and
eight-track. And that the future really is downloadable. The most
important thing for us since the beginning of this strike, or
since the beginning of the negotiations, has been the issue of
downloads, he said.
I do want to say that a lot of people seem to be upset
about the DVD formula and offering to give that up. But I think
it was a really bold and wonderful way of the Writers Guild trying
to come to the table and say, Look, were willing to
move but unfortunately, were unable to negotiate with ourselves,
he continued.
There are also illusions among certain writers, who see the
domination of the entertainment industry by the profit system
as legitimate, about the intentions of the AMPTP.
One striker told the WSWS, I dont necessarily
think theyre hostile. I think theyre doing what theyre
paid to do and thats to get the greatest profit margin.
These things are inevitable. Theyre not there to make people
happy. Theyre there to make their business profitable. And
so you cant necessarily fault them on that. But you do sometimes
have to put a line in the sand and say, Hey dude, there
are certain things you cant do.
The fact is that there are a lot of people that want
to be in this business and [the studios] do put up the money for
very expensive productions. And very expensive productions fail.
And often times its the fault of the writers and often times
its the fault of the studios. I hope theres a middle
ground found so that they know that they need us and we know that
we need them, and that something can happen where there is a nice
place in the middle where we can all be happy. There are positives
and negatives to everything.
The harsh reality that the entertainment conglomerates are
predatory capitalist enterprises intent on rationalizing their
industry, through slashing costs and creating a docile, flexible
work force, needs to be grasped by the striking writers and their
supporters. Illusions on this score will prove fatal in the current
conflict.
Out of this struggle must emerge a significant layer of film
artists who consciously see themselves as socialists and direct
their efforts toward the transformation of the giant companies
into democratically-controlled, public enterprises.
See Also:
Film and television celebrities express
support for striking writers
[14 November 2007]
Increasing bitterness in film and television
writers strike
[13 November 2007]
Sixty-nine percent of those polled
in Los Angeles support walkout
Writers strike enters second week
[12 November 2007]
Stagehands shut down Broadway over producers'
takeaways
[12 November 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |