|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Germany
Support the German train drivers struggle against Deutsche
Bahn!
Statement of the Socialist Equality Party of Germany
11 October 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The following statement was issued in leaflet form to coincide
with industrial action planned by German train drivers for the
end of this week.
The conflict between train drivers and the German Railways
Board (Deutsche BahnDB) has gone well beyond the limits
of a typical contract dispute. Deutsche Bahn is determined to
teach a militant section of its workforce a lesson and smash the
train drivers union, the GDL (Gewerkschaft Deutscher Lokführer).
This is why DB is stubbornly refusing to make any concessions.
It has the support of the German government, the courts, the main
business federations and Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (DGB), Germanys
national trade union federation.
If the DB is successful in its campaign, the dispute will have
serious consequences for all workers. Any movement of resistance
to wage and welfare cuts and the redivision of wealth from working
people to the rich will be subject to intimidation and persecution.
A defeat for the train drivers would open the flood gates for
further attacks on all workers.
The Socialist Equality Party (Partei für Soziale GleichheitPSG)
calls upon the entire working population to close ranks with the
train drivers. Do not permit the DGB-affiliated unions to isolate
the train drivers, who are being put under enormous pressure by
DB management and persecuted in the courts.
Establish solidarity committees and make the struggle of train
drivers the starting point for a broad offensive against wage
and welfare cuts, and against the grand coalition government of
the Social Democratic Party (SPD), Christian Democratic Union
(CDU) and Christian Social Union (CSU) in Berlin.
What are the train drivers demanding?
The chairman of Deutsche Bahn, Hartmut Mehdorn, has endlessly
denounced the unreasonable wage demand of the train
drivers. In doing so he has the broad support of the media. In
fact, train drivers are seeking only to reclaim part of what they
lost in recent years.
Since the reform of Deutsche Bahn in 1994, the workforce has
been halved to 185,000. The workload has risen correspondingly,
while wages have stagnated and, over the past two years, actually
fallen.
The result is an oppressive labour regime involving constant
shift work, in return for an income that is inadequate for a single
person, let alone a family. The gross salary of a train driver
amounts to a maximum of 2,142 euros per month. Following deductions,
drivers are left with an income of between 1,500 and 2,000 euros.
In neighbouring Switzerland, train drivers earn approximately
twice as much.
The GDL demand for a starting salary of 2,500 euros gross,
rising over an extended period to 3,000 euros, together with a
shortening of the work week from 41 to 40 hours, is entirely justified.
Such an increase would cost DB 250 million euros per year. This
sum represents exactly a tenth of the surplus of 2.5 billion euros
which the once-highly indebted enterprise earned last yearat
the expense of the workforce.
Mehdorns own salary rose 100 percent last year to 3.18
million euros. The eight members of the DB executive took home
a combined salary of 20 million euros. Since three quarters of
their income consists of efficiency bonuses, they earn their fortunes
directly from the sacrifices extorted from the workforce.
The situation with regard to Deutsche Bahn reflects the reality
of society as a whole. Wages for German workers have been stagnating
for the past twenty years, while management salaries, corporate
profits and windfalls from speculation have soared. Now the train
drivers are to be taught a lesson to ensure that this orgy of
self-enrichment can continue! This process has not yet peaked,
as demonstrated by the ever-accelerating accumulation of obscene
levels of wealth by the financial aristocracy across the Atlantic.
In the US, the auto workers union, the UAW, has just
signed a contract with General Motors (GM) that halves the wage
for new-hires to $14 (barely 10 euros) per hour. The wage reductions,
together with massive cuts in social security benefits, are expected
to reduce GMs labour costs by two-thirds. In return, the
UAW was recompensed with control of the auto workers retiree
health fund, worth tens of billions of dollars. This turns the
trade union into one of the biggest speculators on Wall Street,
and promises to make the union functionaries very wealthy people,
irrespective the ongoing decline in membership dues.
The strike-breaking role of the DGB
The trade unions are likewise supporting attacks on their own
members. They have been transformed from workers representatives
into co-managers, whose only criterion is the profitability of
the company.
Two other rail workers unions, Transnet and the GDBA, support
DBs plans for privatisation and have backed the reduction
of personnel and wages carried out in recent years. Now they are
advising the DB executive committee on the best way to break the
train drivers strike and are calling upon their own members
to scab. In this pursuit, no lie is too big! Transnet has denounced
the train drivers as contract bashers and accused
of them of disrupting solidarity with other sections
of railway workers.
The Transnet bureaucrats are evidently hoping that rail employees
have a short memory. Just five years ago, this very union really
did play the role of contract basher. At that time,
Transnet signed an auxiliary contract with DB Regio involving
substantially lower pay and conditions for drivers, with up to
18 additional unpaid shifts. The contract ultimately failed because
the GDL refused to sign.
For years, the negotiation of give-backs and concessions has
been a matter of course for the main unions affiliated to the
DGB. The industrial union IG Metall has been a role model in this
respect.
At Volkswagen, the union worked hand in glove with the companys
former labour director, Peter Hartz, who went on to spearhead
the notorious anti-welfare laws that bear his name. Only this
year the public service workers union, Verdi, agreed a contract
involving the loss of 50,000 jobs at German Telekom, together
with drastic wage cuts, longer hours and harsher conditions of
work for those retaining their jobs.
But when train drivers revolt against the wage concessions
dictated by the trade unions, the bureaucrats denounce them for
a lack of solidarity. What hypocrisy! The workers
movement owes virtually all of its gains to those who in the past
fought courageously for improvements. If workers had merely accepted
that which other workers already had, there would still be child
labour in Germany.
The head of Verdi, Frank Bsirske, used the national congress
of his organisation to denounce the train drivers for breaking
ranks, disrupting solidarity and trying to single-handedly
get as much as they could. He made this scab attack on the
train drivers just three months after Verdi sold out the Telekom
workers.
The fact that Bsirske was nevertheless re-elected as chairman
with the votes of 94 percent of the congress delegates shows that
the entire body of bureaucrats is intent on waging war on their
own members.
Government backing for DB
DB Chairman Mehdorn has the full support of Transport Minister
Wolfgang Tiefensee (SPD) in his campaign against the train drivers.
The minister likes to stress his neutrality and hides behind the
statement that he strictly respects bargaining autonomy.
But as the 100 percent owner of the railways, the government
is a party in this conflict and Mehdorn is its employee. By behaving
neutrally the government is, in fact, giving the DB
chairman a free hand to take on the train drivers.
The main concern of both Mehdorn and the government is to float
the rail system on the stock exchange as quickly as possible.
This requires that the company be profitable and have firm control
over its workforce. A success for the train drivers in their dispute
would mean that the sale of shares in the German rail system
to private investors would be in danger, according to the
weekly Die Zeit. The newspaper continues: What sort
of investor readily invests in a company with three trade unions
competing with each other for power and influence?
Class law
DB management and the government also have the backing of the
courts, which, in the face of a militant challenge from any section
of workers, immediately respond by throwing their legal principles
overboard and resorting to the sort of naked class justice
that has played such a perfidious role in Germanys past.
The various judgements of German labour courts, which have
either partially or totally banned strikes by the train drivers,
are a cause for serious concern. The right to strike in Germany
is anchored in the constitutional principle of bargaining autonomy,
which prohibits any state interference. This cannot simply be
set aside by a court order.
A number of lawyers back this interpretation. In an interview
with the Süddeutsche Zeitung, Thomas Dietrich,
president of the Federal Labour Court from 1994 to 1999, described
the ban on train drivers strikes issued over the summer
by a labour court in Nuremberg as grotesque. He said,
The extent of damage done is insufficient on its own to
justify prohibiting a strike.
The same argument, i.e., the disruption and economic damage
arising from a strike, was again employed by a labour court in
Chemnitz to restrict the strike activities of train drivers just
one week ago.
Such a judgement amounts to annulling the right to strike.
If strikes are only permitted on the basis that they cause little
or no economic damage, the strike weapon is deprived of any force.
The sense of a strike consists in exerting pressure by causing
economic damage. If the Chemnitz judgement is taken as a guideline,
all militant disputes will end up before a judge, with the strikers
facing the threat of imprisonment.
A new perspective
The train drivers union, the GDL, headed by CDU member (and
former parliamentary deputy) Manfred Schell, is completely incapable
of challenging a united front of the DB executive committee, the
government, the courts and the DGB trade union federation. The
GDL leadership has twisted and turned for weeks desperately seeking
a compromise.
Earlier this week, Schell announced that the union would commence
four days of strike action beginning Thursday, October 11. At
the last minute, however, Schell agreed to talks with management
and precipitously called off any action for Thursday.
The union has long since signalled its readiness to bring down
its wage demands. It is, however, less able to back down on its
demand for a separate contract for train drivers because this
would threaten its survival as an independent organization.
The docile and vacillating stance struck by the GDL only serves
to embolden the DB executive in its drive to defeat the workers
and smash the union.
The action taken by the GDL on October 5 resembled more a lockout
than a strike. Exploiting the GDLs desperate hopes for negotiations
and compromise over the preceding weeks, the DB had ample time
to draw up its plan of attack. On October 5, GDL train drivers
were not even allowed onto their locomotives, and GDL members
who sought to demonstrate were escorted from railway stations.
Since then, the DB executive has dug in even further and categorically
turned down any new offer from the union.
Train drivers can no longer leave the leadership of their dispute
in the hands of GDL. They should set up their own independent
committees to conduct the struggle. They should establish contact
with the members of the other railway unions and mobilize them
in a broad front against the strike-breaking treachery of the
leadership of Transnet and other unions. The strike must be expanded
to shut down the entire rail system for an unlimited period. To
this end, the train drivers require the solidarity and support
of the entire working class.
The defence of living standards as well as social and democratic
rights requires a fundamentally new political strategy. The needs
of working people must be given priority over the profit interests
of big business, through the fight for a socialist programme.
Production in general and important public services such as the
railways must be freed from the grip of a financial aristocracy
and placed at the service of society as a whole.
This can be achieved only if workers break with their old,
national-based organizations and conduct a struggle for the socialist
reorganization of society on a European and world-wide basis.
This is the aim of the World Socialist Web Site and the
Socialist Equality Party.
See Also:
German court attacks train drivers strike
[8 October 2007]
Germany: Train drivers need a new perspective
[5 October 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |