|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Theater
The Kingdom: Spinning reality any way one wants
By Hiram Lee
22 October 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Directed by Peter Berg, screenplay by Matthew Carnahan
Peter Bergs latest film The Kingdom, about an
FBI investigation into a bombing in Saudi Arabia, has been called
controversial in a number of recent reviews, primarily for its
treatment of Middle Eastern politics and terrorism. In reality,
the film is far from controversial in any meaningful sense. In
treating its various subjects, the work represents an adherence
to the official line of some of the most official
sources.
The film takes some of its inspiration from stories in former
FBI director Louis Freehs book My FBI, and the Bureau
apparently had the opportunity to offer their input during the
writing process of the film, as well. Of working with screenwriter
Matthew Carnahan, Peter Berg said in an interview with Comingsoon.net,
We just talked for several weeks about the basic idea, then
I hooked him up with a bunch of FBI agents and political experts
and sent him off, and he came back two months later with the script.
The level of conformism and groveling to authority is revolting.
And to the extent that Bergs film is an attempt to deal
with tensions in the Middle East, it is a very poor attempt. Discussing
the subject in an interview with IndieLondon, Berg said,
The Middle East has been a big mess since we were born.
What weve done in The Kingdom is to create a piece
of entertainment loosely based on things that happened and weve
set it in that world. I dont know why youre not seeing
more of that. The idea of doing a bank robbery in Baghdad would
be a cool idea to me. Theres so many different movies that
can be based on the reality of what happened. You can spin it
anyway you want.
For Berg, the Middle East is just another exotic locale in
which to shoot a movie. It has its peculiar characteristics as
a set piece just as the rainforest might, or the city streets
of Hong Kong. Anywhere interesting to set his story.
And what of the story? The Kingdom first takes us to
a compound in Riyadh where the families of American oil company
employees are gathered for a softball game. All of a sudden, two
men in a truck drive through the neighborhood gunning people down.
A Saudi policeman is able to stop them, but it was only a diversion.
In the chaos a suicide bomber makes his way onto the ball field.
Dozens are killed in the explosion.
Another explosion will follow in the same area that evening,
targeting first responders and investigators. A friend and colleague
of FBI agent Ronald Fleury (Jamie Foxx) is killed.
Receiving word of the second attack, Fleury and his colleagues
at the FBI aggressively campaign for the right to enter Saudi
Arabia and investigate. The State Department has refused, wishing
to pursue a more diplomatic approach. Undaunted, Fleury begins
some behind-the-scenes maneuvering, threatening to blackmail members
of the Saudi royal family if he isnt allowed access to the
site of the explosions. With his threats having worked their magic,
Fleury and a team of agents not quite having gone rogue and not
quite authorized travel to the Riyadh compound.
Given only limited access to the crime scene, the team is constantly
chaperoned by Colonel Faris Al Ghazi (Ashraf Barhom). Slowly the
FBI agents will win the confidence and friendship of Al Ghazi
(in spite of having ridiculed him for the first half of the film),
and together they will go in search of the men who ordered the
bombings of the compound.
From police procedural to all-out action film extravaganza,
The Kingdom unfolds in all the ways we might expect. The
FBI team, like so many other law enforcement teams in the movies
or on television, comes complete with the heroic lead investigator
(Foxx), the surly veteran (Chris Cooper), the forensic examiner
(Jennifer Garner) and the wisecracking computer expert (Jason
Bateman). All are essentially arrogant and insulting for most
of the film, taking every opportunity to mock their Saudi counterparts.
These are truly dislikable characters.
There is also an unusual amount of incidental conversation
between the agents. At various times, the team members discuss
basketball, fishing, necktie fashions and so on. It doesnt
amount to anything, and the viewer loses interest quickly.
In similarly ridiculous attempts to humanize its Saudi characters,
The Kingdom manages only to be condescending. Colonel Al
Ghazi and a fellow officer are shown in their respective homes
praying or taking care of children or sick family members. Look,
says the film, theyre just like us. Berg gives
these moments a lot of weight. Slow-motion photography and music
cues let us know we should be deeply touched by these mundane
proceedings. We do not, however, get a real feeling for the lives
of these characters or learn anything at all significant about
them. Nothing, anyway, that would truly humanize them.
Berg often uses his technique to create a veneer of realism
without bothering to actually explore reality in any substantive
way. There is, most obviously, his ever-roving camera, mimicking
a cinema verité documentary style. It moves first
here, then there. Why? No one knows. If one agrees with Alexander
Astrucs idea of caméra-stylo, that the director
should use his or her camera like an author uses a pen, then this
is the cinematic equivalent of scribbling all over the page. But
Berg, it should be noted, is neither the worst offender in this
nor the first. The nauseating and constant movement of hand-held
cameras is among the most irritating trends in current filmmaking.
Following the unsuccessful attempts at moments of humanity,
The Kingdom comes to an end with an all-out violent assault.
The FBI team, with the help of Al Ghazi and a few of his men,
storm a terrorist compound. Bullets, rockets and grenades go flying
by. Faceless terrorists are shot down like characters in a video
game. None of the FBI members will even be wounded.
There is a moment during this raid that is especially telling.
When a terrorist pops up out of the dark corner of one room, Fleury
and Al Ghazi wheel around in unison and fire on the man together.
Bergs camera, briefly but significantly, frames the guns
of the two men as they fire simultaneously side by side. Here
Bergs film argues for a coming together, not of working
people internationally against war, but of official governmental
agencies in the successful prosecution of the so-called war
on terror.
Spinning reality in another direction in the films final
moments, Berg leaves us with the message that we have
to stop killing each other. Or, as the director put it in the
previously cited interview with IndieLondon, You
cant kill your way through the problem....
This sudden turn to pacifism is out of place. It just doesnt
cohere with the glorious battle of rocket-propelled grenades and
the FBI victory in the climactic moments of the picture.
The Kingdom is simply a film that gets it all wrong.
Or, depending on your point of view, all right. As Berg told Comingsoon.net,
Weve had a great reaction from the FBI in particular.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |