|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
General Motors worker: The UAW doesnt lose, but
the workers do
By our reporter
28 September 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Some media reports on Thursday expressed apprehension that
as details of the UAW-General Motors contract become better known,
momentum will grow among GM workers to reject the sell-out. This
fear was doubtless a factor in the decline in GM share values
on Wall Street on Thursday, after a sharp rise following the suppression
of the strike on Wednesday.
The World Socialist Web Site spoke with a long-time
GM worker who expressed opposition to the contract. Lyle, a worker
at the Saginaw Metal Casting plant, said, I wouldnt
vote for this. Maybe the union thought that by striking for two
days we would go for this contract. The guys are very dissatisfied.
I cant see the membership ratifying this.
Ive read the Wall Street Journal and theyre
gloating over the agreement. They took away our cost-of-living
allowance and all were going to get are lump-sum payments.
We fought hard for COLA to help against inflation and the union
just dropped it. Now rising costs are going to continue to gnaw
away at our hourly wages.
GM will no longer be obligated to pay retiree health
benefits when they set up this VEBA fund. Look at the history
of these truststheyve failed. Does the UAW think it
can invest the money better than GM, with all their financial
consultants? In ten years time the trust will be screwed
up and well be losing our benefits.
Gettelfinger said the job security in the contract was
the main achievement. If that was the main thing, then were
in bad shape. For the last thirty years the union has talked about
job security guarantees. At the same time the UAW membership has
fallen from 1.5 million to 500,000. Two-thirds of us are gone.
Is that job security?
Im now working at my fourth GM plant. I worked
at three different plants that closedFleetwood Body in Detroit,
Willow Run Assembly in Ypsilanti and Buick City in Flint. There
were once 20,000 workers at Buick City before they all lost their
jobs.
Thats letting us go slowly under the guise of protecting
us. This talk about job securityits lies, lies, lies.
This contract doesnt make sense for a worker who
has been there a while or for the young workers who will be coming
in at a reduced wage of $12-$15, instead of the current $27 an
hour. They say that the lower wages will be for non-production-related
jobs. But that could be anything.
The company wanted to outsource a lot of these jobs,
but instead, with the agreement, they can keep them in-house and
pay the same rate as they would to someone on the outside. The
only difference is the union keeps these workers as dues-paying
members. The UAW doesnt lose, but the workers do.
We want the details; they havent released anything
to the members yet. When they do, it will be full of lies. Im
anxious to look at it because it will be entertaining. You never
get the truth from the UAW.
See Also:
Details of General Motors contract underscore
UAW betrayal
[28 September 2007]
Total surrender by US auto union
[27 September 2007]
As impact of walkout spreads
GM strikers confront intransigence of US auto giant
[26 September 2007]
General Motors workers oppose threats
to retiree health care, jobs
[26 September 2007]
US auto workers shut down General Motors
[25 September 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |