|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Jena Six teen still in prison after conviction
dismissed
By Lawrence Porter
24 September 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A judge ruled on Friday that Mychal Bell, whose conviction
as one of the Jena Six was thrown out earlier this month, must
remain in prison pending an appeal from prosecutors to the Louisiana
Supreme Court. Bell, the victim of a racist prosecution that has
targeted six high school students, has already spent nine months
in jail.
The decision of Lasalle Parish District Judge J.P. Mauffray
came one day after an estimated 50,000 demonstrators converged
on the small, northern Louisiana town. In a separate decision
on Friday, Ninth Judicial District Court Judge Tom Yeager rejected
a motion from Bells lawyers to have Mauffray removed from
the case.
Bell, like the other five black studentsJesse Ray Beard,
Robert Bailey, Jr., Carwin Jones, Bryant Purvis and Theo Shawwas
charged with beating a white student, Justin Barker, last December.
Only Bell and Beard were under 17 at the time of the arrest. The
four others still face adult trials where they could face decades
in prison.
The fight between the students followed months of racial tension
that began when three nooses were hung over a tree where the white
students normally congregate, called the white tree.
The nooses were found one day after black students, having asked
for permission from school authorities, sat under the tree.
Bell was found guilty of aggravated second-degree battery and
conspiracy in June by an all-white jury that deliberated for only
three hours. He was originally tried as an adult on the grounds
that he had a prior criminal record. Mauffray later sent the conspiracy
charge to juvenile court, but he upheld the battery conviction.
However, the Third Circuit Court of Appeal overturned the battery
conviction on September 14, stating it also belonged in juvenile
court.
The primary concern of the two hearings was Bells release.
Bell is the only one of the six who remains in jail, the result
of decisions by Mauffray. Before his trial in June, his family
was unable to raise the $90,000 bond set by Mauffray. The bonds
for the other defendants were also very high, from $70,000 to
$138,000an extraordinary sum for poor, working-class families.
The parents of several defendants had to appeal to other family
members to assist by using their homes as collateral for the bonds.
Once Bell was convicted, he could no longer be released on
bond. However, with the conviction overturned, and the case now
before a juvenile court, the judge has the discretion of granting
a new bond or releasing Bell pending appeal. Mauffrays decision
to deny bond is another vindictive strike against Bell.
Details of the decision have not been released, and attorneys
and relatives of Bell would not confirm the decision because Bell
is now in Juvenile Court proceedings, which are secret. However,
John Jenkins, the father of another one of the defendants, told
the media that Bells father said to him that bond had been
denied.
It makes no sense to do this to a child with such great
talents as Mychal, said Bells cousin, Shanice Thomas,
according to the Baton-Rouge newspaper the Advocate. Thomas
was referring to Bells standing as an honor student and
star athlete. Hell sit in jail as long as they can
legally keep him, she added, speaking outside of the courtroom.
Another major factor in the continued imprisonment of Mychal
Bell is the role of LaSalle Parish District Attorney Reed Walters.
Walters is prosecuting the six black youth and said he planned
to appeal the Third Circuit Courts decision overturning
Bells conviction. He has two weeks to do so.
According to the local Sheriff, Carl Smith, as a result of
Mauffrays decision, Bell cannot be released from the LaSalle
Parish jail unless Walters drops the appeal or the Louisiana Supreme
Court rules in Bells favor.
Walters played a prominent role in escalating tensions following
the hanging of the nooses last September. After protests by black
students, Walters was called to address an assembly at the school.
According to students at the assembly, Walters, flanked by armed
police and while looking at the black students, told the group,
See this pen? I can take away your lives with the stroke
of my pen.
After the fight in December, Walters pushed for the maximum
punishment possible. Although Barker was well enough to attend
a school function that evening, the black students were charged
by Walters with attempted second-degree murder. It was only later
that the charges were downgraded to battery.
Two sets of justice were being used in the district. The white
students on the campus were continuously given light treatment.
The school board overturned a recommendation from the principal
that the three students involved in the noose incident be expelled.
In the interview with a school board member, Democracy Now!
revealed that Walters acted as both the legal representative of
the school board and the prosecutor in the case. When Democracy
Now! host Amy Goodman asked the board member, Billy Fowler,
if he saw a conflict of interest in the advice from Walters, Fowler
said he assumed Walters knew the law.
Goodman interviewed two of the six students charged in the
case, Theo Shaw and Robert Bailey, Bailey said many of the kids
in the school were angry, including white students. The
whole school was mad, not just black people, Bailey told
Goodman. The whole school was mad. It was some white boys
who wanted to fight them boys for hanging the nooses in the school
once they came back (from suspension).
Bailey said he felt the white students should have received
the same discipline he receivedexpulsion from school.
Several incidents last week indicate that threats against the
Jena Six continue to escalate. On Thursday it was revealed that
two youth drove around the demonstration with nooses hanging out
of their truck in an obvious provocation directed at the mostly
black demonstrators. And on Saturday, news reports revealed that
a pro-Nazi outfit listed the names and phone numbers of Jena Six
families on a web site to encourage its followers to send threatening
phone calls.
Racism in Jena and in other parts of the US is consciously
promoted by sections of the ruling elite to obscure the real causes
of the social ills in American society. However, a cursory investigation
into the social conditions in Louisiana reveals that poverty is
widespread among all sections of the working class in the state
and mirrors the conditions facing workers throughout the country.
According to the US Census, the poverty rate in Louisiana,
at 19.2 percent, is the highest in the south and the second highest
in the country. More than 26 percent of children under 18 years
of age live in poverty, also the highest in the south and the
second highest in the nation. In Jena, more than 18 percent of
the population lives in poverty, with 20 percent of children in
the same category.
The officially-sanctified leaders of the demonstration last
week are seeking to channel oppositional sentiment behind the
Democratic Party. Democratic Representative John Conyers has pledged
to hold hearings on the case this week, following calls from Jesse
Jackson and members of the Black Congressional Caucus. His aim
is to give the appearance that something will be done, while consciously
seeking to obscure the basic social questions that underlie the
case of the Jena Six.
The WSWS renews its call for the charges against the Jena Six
to be immediately dropped. The students should be allowed back
into school and fully reinstated. Those who orchestrated this
racially-motivated prosecution should be brought to justice.
See also:
Thousands demonstrate in support of Jena
Six
[21 September 2007]
The Jena Six in Louisiana: Convictions
overturned in Mychal Bell case
[17 September 2007]
Racist frame-up in Louisiana:
the case of the Jena Six
[31 July 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |