|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Film
Reviews
Romulus, My Father: a compassionate film about immigrant
life in Australia
By Gabriela Zabala-Notaras and Ismet Redzovic
18 September 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Romulus, My Father is based on the 1998 biographical
memoir of the same name by philosopher Raimond Gaita. It is the
directorial debut of Australian actor Richard Roxburgh, whose
acting credits include, Oscar and Lucinda (1996), Passion:
The Story of Percy Grainger (1999), Moulin Rouge! (2001),
League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (2003) and Like Minds
(2006).
Roxburghs first film is an honest and heartfelt work
about the personal hardships and tragedies endured by Romulus
Gaitas immigrant family, one of the tens of thousands that
settled in Australia in the early 1950s.
With almost 25 percent of Australias current population
born outside the country, local movies about this subject are
numerous, almost constituting a specific genre. Some in the last
decade include, The Sound of One Hand Clapping, Looking
for Alibrandi, Floating Life, Marking Time and Molly and
Mubarak. This year alone has seen the release of three other
featuresLucky Miles, The Home Song Stories,
which has a number of similarities to Roxburghs movie, and
The Jammed. These constitute a healthy, almost subliminal,
reaction against the anti-immigrant rhetoric of Australian talkback
radio and the tabloid press.
Romulus, My Father continues this tradition, with the
story seen through the eyes of Romuluss 10-year-old son
Raimond (Kodi Smit-McPhee).
Romanian-born Romulus (Eric Bana) and his beautiful but psychologically
troubled German wife Christina (Franka Potente) have immigrated
to Australia from Yugoslavia and are living in the rural town
of Maryborough, about 107 kilometres northwest of Melbourne. Romulus
is a skilled ironworker and, under the terms of his immigration
passage, he must be prepared to work in any industry anywhere
in Australia for the first two years.
Christina yearns for cosmopolitan Europe, finding it impossible
to settle into the small, dry and dusty settlement. She has several
love affairs and flits in and out of the family home before finally
leaving Romulus for his friend Mitru (Russell Dykstra).

Romulus tolerates Christinas behaviour despite the insistence
of Hora (Martin Csokas)his closest friend and Mitrus
brotherthat he should leave her. Hora is a highly principled
man and, like Romulus, instills in Raimond the importance of education
and cultured human relations. He becomes a kind of mentor in the
young boys life.
Christina and Mitru have a baby and move to Melbourne. Christinas
deteriorating mental health and their miserable existence in a
poverty-stricken inner-city boarding house eventually overwhelm
Mitru and he commits suicide. Tragically, Christina, who is forced
to put the baby in foster care and work in a shoe factory, eventually
also takes her life.
For Romulus, there is the possibility of a new relationship
with a woman still living in Yugoslavia. After sending money to
help her immigrate, he discovers that she is already married and
has used the money to assist her own family.
Romulus, however, seems to be an indomitable force throughoutgenerous,
trusting and always optimisticand able to impart to his
son the necessity for humanity and kindness under all circumstances.
But the almost endless obstacles to establishing financial and
emotional stability become too much. Romulus has a nervous breakdown
and admits himself to a sanatorium, where he spends several years.
Romulus, My Father has moments of deeply-felt tragedy
and touches on issuesmental breakdown, suicidethat
were not well understood in Australia in the early 1950s. Nevertheless,
it is not a pessimistic work. Like Gaitas best-selling book,
it is brutally honest and has some genuinely uplifting moments,
expressed in the enduring love between father and son.
All the actors are convincing, particularly the young Smit-Macphee
as Raimond, and there is a genuine, unforced affinity between
the two main protagonists, who are often able to express the complexities
of their relationship with little more than a look or gesture.
Geoffrey Simpsons cinematography is
used to good effect, capturing the seemingly omnipotent geography
of rural Australia, with its blinding, almost unrelenting sunlight.
The still and harsh aridity of the countrysideespecially
for Christina, who seems cowed by its ferocityis a forceful
counterpoint to the emotional upheavals that pervade the Gaita
household.
The natural environment is only one of the new experiences
encountered by the young immigrant family. The new
country is socially different from the close-knit and densely
populated rural villages of Romania and Yugoslavia with which
Romulus was familiar, and worlds away from the culture and cosmopolitanism
of Germany where Christina grew up.
Despite its undoubted strengths, Romulus, My Father
is, however, only a partially successful work, with moments that
cry out for more depth. The sense of alienation is clearly apparent
in the familys tumultuous relationships, but why did Romulus
and Christina leave Europe in the first place? What were the circumstances?
The film provides no real answers, an omission that appears to
be deliberate.
As Richard Roxburgh explained to one journalist: We were
determined that the film must, at all costs, avoid the trap of
the period drama. There were to be as few elements
as possible of the set-in-aspic-migrant-period-story... This would
ensure that there would be no safety of distance, that somehow
the story, in all of its dark and complex beauty, would be allowed
to breathe with a contemporary immediacy.
Obviously no one wants a cold period drama but
the elimination of important historical context is a limiting
factor and an ongoing problem in most recent local cinema. Romulus
was clearly a man with a strong moral compass, but what were the
social and historical factorswar, Depression, the struggle
against fascismthat helped shape him?
Romulus, My Father presents the events and characters
in mainly episodic form. This is not to say that the film is disjointed,
but the absence of a strong narrative gives it a sense of repetitiousness
which, after a while, tends to blunt its emotional impact. The
movie also has a propensity to be static and lacking in dramatic
flair. This is perhaps bound up with the fact that the book itself
provides little historical context. But instead of trying to overcome
this problem, the movie tries to further emphasise the relationship
between father and son.
Peter Galvin from Inside Film Magazine (May 2007) says
of Romulus, My Father that it is, An episodic narrative
of impressions and feelings. Intended as praise for this
obviously sincere work, it instead, quite accurately, describes
the films limitations.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |