|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Two soldiers critical of Iraq war among its latest casualties
By Naomi Spencer
14 September 2007
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Two Army sergeants who were co-authors of a public letter sharply
critical of the US occupation of Iraq and the Pentagons
assessment of it were killed in a Baghdad vehicle accident Monday.
The deaths came as General David Petraeus, the top military commander
in Iraq, prepared to deliver congressional testimony declaring
the troop buildup a success.
Sergeant Omar Mora and Staff Sergeant Yance Gray, whose The
War as We Saw It, written with five other soldiers and published
last month in the New York Times, were among nine killed
when their truck veered off an elevated highway and fell about
30 feet.
Those killed included seven soldiers and two detainees. The
crash also wounded 12 others, including one detainee. The military
made no mention of hostile fire in its announcements of the incident.
The soldiers were members of the 82nd Airborne Division, part
of the Armys Task Force Lightning, a large force charged
with stamping out resistance in Northern Iraq. Since September
5, the unit has been engaged in bloody air strikes and raids as
part of counterinsurgency operations referred to as Lightning
Hammer II. The 82nd Airborne Division has borne 53 deaths so far
this year, 14 of those in the past month.
While perhaps better known than other soldiers to some because
of their Times commentary, the backgrounds of the two sergeants
typify the ranks of the US enlisted. Both Mora, who was 28, and
Gray, 26, were expecting to come home to their wives and families
by November. Gray was the father of a five-month-old daughter
whom he had only seen once; Mora is survived by a five-year-old
daughter.
Gray, who grew up in Montana, liked to write and to draw. Mora,
who was born in Ecuador and grew up in Texas, had recently been
granted US citizenship. His family said he was passionate about
fixing cars and playing soccer.
Both were described by their parents as independent-minded,
warmhearted, and disciplined sons who had entered the military
out of a sense of duty. And, like thousands of other troops currently
in Iraq, both had been endlessly redeployed. Mora and Gray were
serving their third and fourth tours, respectively.
Moras mother, Olga Capetillo, told the press that her
son was deeply affected by the conditions in which he witnessed
Iraqis living. The pain and poverty suffered by children prompted
him to often ask his family to send packages of cookies and candy.
In late August, his mother said, a friend died in Moras
arms.
When he called her for the last time on September 7, she described
him as withdrawn and exhausted. He was so quiet, as if he
did not want anyone to hear him, she told the Associated
Press. I told him that I was counting the days until he
would come home, that I would give him a big hug.
Maybe he had a premonition that something was going to
happen to him, that he was not going to come back, Capetillo
told the AP. My son escaped death two times before. But
this time, no.
I want to know all the details of how he died,
she said. I want to know the truth. I dont understand
how so many people could die in that accident. How could it be
so bad?
In their letter published August 19, the soldiers described
the situation confronting the Iraqi population as well as US troops
as one of extreme peril, chaos and terror. Even as they authored
the piece, one of the seven soldiers, Staff Sergeant Jeremy Murphy,
was shot in the head and had to be airlifted out of Iraq. He remains
hospitalized in the US.
The soldiers called the Pentagons appraisal of the war
surreal. To believe that Americans, with an
occupying force that long ago outlived its reluctant welcome,
can win over a recalcitrant local population and win this counterinsurgency
is far-fetched, they wrote. We are skeptical of recent
press coverage portraying the conflict as increasingly manageable
and feel it has neglected the mounting civil, political and social
unrest we see every day.
Without challenging the underlying political justification
for the occupation, the soldiers sharply disputed the official
claims of progress and success in Iraq. They wrote, we operate
in a bewildering context of determined enemies and questionable
allies, one where the balance of forces on the ground remains
entirely unclear.... While we have the will and the resources
to fight in this context, we are effectively hamstrung because
realities on the ground require measures we will always refusenamely,
the widespread use of lethal and brutal force.
The ability of, say, American observers to safely walk
down the streets of formerly violent towns is not a resounding
indicator of security. In contrast to the photo-ops staged
by visiting politicians, the soldiers wrote, we see that
a vast majority of Iraqis feel increasingly insecure and view
us as an occupation force that has failed to produce normalcy
after four years and is increasingly unlikely to do so as we continue
to arm each warring side.
The soldiers clearly saw the ruinous state of Iraqi society
as a major concern, and one that they recognized was utterly ignored
by the wars architects. They wrote that the most important
front in the counterinsurgency, improving basic social and economic
conditions, is the one on which we have failed most miserably.
Two million Iraqis are in refugee camps in bordering countries.
Close to two million more are internally displaced and now fill
many urban slums. Cities lack regular electricity, telephone services
and sanitation. Lucky Iraqis live in gated communities
barricaded with concrete blast walls that provide them with a
sense of communal claustrophobia rather than any sense of security
we would consider normal.
Their comments elicited a strong but pursed-lipped reaction
from the Pentagon. In its short statement on the editorial, issued
to the journal Editor & Publisher, the military attempted
to isolate and dismiss the soldiers. It is important to
note that as individuals voice their opinions on matters, that
those viewpoints are representative of their personal perspective.
With approximately 160,000 Americans serving in uniform here in
Iraq in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, youll probably
get that many different perspectives if you ask each of them.
To the contrary, while the 82nd Airborne Division soldiers
were speaking from their own experience, they were also speaking
to some degree of the common experience for active duty troops.
They sent the editorial unsolicited and refused payment in exchange
for its publishing.
Following General Petraeuss congressional report this
week, President Bush was expected to announce a token reduction
in US forces. The White House has emphasized that this so-called
drawdown does not signal a shift in policy, and that troop levels
cannot be expected to be reduced to the pre-surge
level of 130,000 before mid-2008, meaning casualty figures will
continue to mount.
The latest confirmed fatalities bring the US toll to 34 so
far in September, and to 690 since the troop surge began in February.
Since 2003, 3,776 US military personnel have died; total occupation
force casualties stand at 4,074.
See Also:
Gen. Petraeus testifies before Congress:
Democrats arrest protesters, praise US commander in Iraq
[11 September 2007]
18 US troops killed in Iraq in first
week of September
[8 September 2007]
As congressional debate opens, US escalates
military operations in northern Iraq
[7 September 2007]
14 US soldiers killed in Iraq
helicopter crash
[23 August 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |