|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Italy
Collapse of left parties enables Berlusconi to
win Italian election
By Peter Schwarz
16 April 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Just two years after being voted out of office, the media magnate
Silvio Berlusconi will become head of the Italian government for
a third time. His right-wing alliance People of Freedom
(PdLPopolo della Libertà) obtained a clear majority
in both chambers of parliament in the elections held on Sunday
and Monday.
With around 47 percent of the vote for both chambers, Berlusconi
easily defeated his main rival, Walter Veltroni, who won just
38 percent.
Belusconi has won 340 seats in the Chamber of Deputies, including
the bonus allocated to the winning party, while Veltroni has only
241 seats. The Christian Democratic UDC, led by Pier Ferdinando
Casini, which has close relations with the Vatican and stood independently
from any other alliance, won 36 seats. In the Senate, Berlusconi
will command 171 mandates as opposed to 130 for Veltroni and 2
for the UDC.
The election turnout of 80 percent was about 3 percent less
than in the elections two years ago. In Italy, electoral participation
is officially enforced by law, although no sanctions are imposed
on those who do not bother to cast a ballot.
The election not only secured a majority for the right wing,
but for the first time resulted in a political structure thatsimilar
to the American systemconsists of two major right-wing bourgeois
parties. From a previous total of over twenty parties and groupings
with parliamentary representation, just six were returned to parliament.
The two most important components of Berlusconis alliance,
his own Forza Italia and the post-fascist National Alliance, led
by Gianfranco Fini, established a joint list for the elections,
and plan to unite shortly into one large right-wing party. In
addition, the separatist Northern League and the relatively insignificant
autonomy movement (MpaMovimento per Autonomia) stood as
part of the People of Freedom alliance.
Prior to the election, Veltroni had united the Left Democrats
(successor to the Communist Party), the Christian Democratic Margherita
and several smaller groupings into the Democratic Party. The DP
models itself after the American Democrats and advances a similar
pro-business economic program. The only ally of the Democrats
was the group Italy of Values (Italia dei Valori),
led by the former anti-corruption judge Antonio Di Pietro, which
gained 5 percent of the total won by Veltronis camp.
Collapse of the Rainbow Left
Veltroni had refused to cooperate with the parties on the left
wing of the previous government coalition led by Romano Prodi.
These parties then, of necessity, established their own election
alliancethe Rainbow Left (Sinistra arcobaleno). This alliance
was made up of Refounded Communism (Rifondazione Comunista), the
Greens, the Italian Communists (PdCI) and the Democratic Left
(SD), a split-off from the former Left Democrats.
The Rainbow Left suffered the worst defeat in the election.
At the time of its foundation, leaders of the alliance predicted
it would garner around 15 percent of the vote. Opinion polls prior
to the election put support for the alliance at 7 percent. In
the event, the alliance won a little more than 3 percentinsufficient
to enter parliament.
Rifondazione, formerly represented in both chambers of the
parliament with over 40 delegates in each, was unable to defend
a single seat. The newspaper Repubblica spoke of the result
as a veritable earthquake.
The collapse of support for the so-called left
becomes clearer when one looks at the results in some of its former
strongholds. In Tuscany, Rifondazione won 8.2 percent in 2006,
and together with the Greens and the PdCI picked up a total of
13.4 percent. In this election, the Rainbow Left received just
4.5 percent. In the region Emilia Romagna, the share of the vote
that went to the Rainbow Left plummeted from 10 to 3 percent.
In Latium (which includes Rome) the vote of the left
parties comprising the Rainbow Left fell to 3.3 percent from 13
percent, while in Umbria it went from 12.7 to 3.5 percent.
The collapse of the left is crucial to any understanding
of the election result. Since emerging from the break-up of the
Italian Communist Party 17 years ago and absorbing a number of
petty-bourgeois left groups along the way, Rifondazione
called upon its supporters to back allegedly progressive bourgeois
governments. Time and time again it was Rifondazione that secured
such governments a majority in parliament, until it directly entered
into power in 2006 as part of the coalition led by Prodi. It continually
justified its opportunism with the argument that it was necessary
to back the lesser evil against the right wing.
The results of this type of politics have been disastrous.
Rifondazione and its allies have effectively prevented the working
class from developing its own independent political orientation.
Instead, Rifondazione trotted tamely behind Prodi and his predecessors.
In the current election, the organisations main role was
to provide a left cover for Veltronis election campaign.
On this basis, the Rainbow Left were incapable of winning any
serious support. The abysmal election result for the Rainbow Left
is an expression of the fact thatafter two years of the
Prodi governmentillusions have been dashed in the ability
of such supposedly left reformist governments to resolve
the countrys deepening economic and social crisis.
The economic situation in Italy has rapidly worsened. According
to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,
the Italian economy will barely grow this year, Italys share
of world trade is declining, and wages are stagnating. Many Italians
are so bad off they cannot afford to eat a meal of pasta every
day. A layer of young adults has emerged whose economic situation
is so precarious that they cannot risk starting a family.
Growing inflation and the stagnation of wages were central
issues in the election campaign. Stinking piles of rubbish, which
filled the streets of Naples for weeks and led to mass protests,
became a symbol of an utterly corrupt and incompetent political
elite motivated solely by personal advantage. The Berlusconi camp
was able to exploit these issues, although the roots of the garbage
scandal are to be found in Berlusconis own previous period
in power.
The decrease in the election turnout is largely a result of
abstention by disillusioned former supporters of the left.
Other voters supported Berlusconi because they thought he might
be more effective in tackling major issues than the hopelessly
divided coalition led by Prodi.
An unstable government
In particular, the Northern League was able to profit from
this state of affairs. Although it had gone through a prolonged
crisis, the party, with its base in the wealthier north, was able
to record its best ever election result and double its presence
in both chambers of parliament.
With a national average of over 8 percent, the Northern League
was able to guarantee Berlusconis election victory. In fact,
support for Berlusconis own list was somewhat reduced compared
to two years previously. According to opinion polls, many industrial
workers who had formerly supported the left switched
to the Northern League. In highly industrialized Lombardy, the
party emerged strongest, with 30 percent of the vote.
The politics of the Northern League combine propaganda against
the central government in Rome with demands for more autonomy
for the north and open xenophobia. The leader of the party, Umberto
Bossi, declared at election meetings: We have had enough
of centralism from a predatory Rome. As a result of disillusionment
with the Prodi government, such slogans found support amongst
certain layers.
The enhanced standing of the Northern League will, however,
have a destabilizing impact on the new government. Differences
between the separatist Northern League and the centralist National
Alliance, which has its stronghold in the south of the country,
are of a potentially explosive nature. Such differences contributed
to the collapse of the first Berlusconi government in 1995. According
to the Corriere della Sera, the demand of the Northern
League for more decentralisation in regard to taxes will only
deepen the already substantial gulf between the north and south
of the country.
Of even more significance is the contradiction between the
enormously tense social situation and the right-wing program of
the new government, which will tend to make the new administration
extremely unstable. Most commentators, including those from the
right, are united in this assessment.
The Swiss Neue Zürcher Zeitung points out that
Berlusconi in contrast to Prodi, will not inherit an economic
upturn, but rather persistent stagnation, if not an actual recession.
This will make it extremely difficult for him to fulfil the bold
promises he made in the election campaign.
The Financial Times Deutschland warns under the headline
ItalyTragedy, Third Act: Catastrophic
growth figures, pre-modern productivity rates and a monstrous
state deficit are risk factors for the domestic market and the
eurozone. Berlusconi will never undertake the difficult reforms
necessary to defuse the risks.
Looming social conflicts are also behind Berlusconis
offer on the evening of the election to cooperate with Veltroni,
despite Berlusconis clear majority. We are ready to
work on reforms together with the opposition, Berlusconi
said, adding, We have difficult months before us which call
for great efforts.
See Also:
Italian elections: polls favour Berlusconi
comeback
[12 April 2008]
Italy: parties shift to the
right as election campaign begins
[17 March 2008]
Elections called in Italy
[12 February 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |