|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton and the corporate domination of
the Democratic Party
By Patrick Martin
12 April 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The resignation of Mark Penn, the top campaign strategist for
Hillary Clinton, sheds light on a feature of the Democratic Party
that is not merely an aspect, but rather the essence, of this
political institution: it, like the Republican Party, is a wholly
owned subsidiary of corporate interests.
Penn stepped down after the Wall Street Journal revealed
that he had met March 31 with the Colombian ambassador to the
United States to discuss a campaign to lobby Congress for approval
of the US-Colombia free-trade pact. While Senator Clinton is a
public opponent of the pact and has vowed to vote against it,
Penn, in his capacity as CEO of the giant lobbying firm Burson
Marsteller, signed a $300,000 contract with the Colombian government
to push for passage.
There were probably internal reasons for Penns departure
as well as the flagrant conflict between his corporate and political
roles. The Clinton campaign is in dire straits, with polls showing
a shrinking or even nonexistent lead in Pennsylvania, where defeat
in the April 22 primary would effectively end Clintons candidacy
for the Democratic presidential nomination.
Penn played a major role in the transformation of Clinton from
near-certain nominee six months ago to an increasingly desperate
and visibly demoralized candidate, hoping for a miraculous implosion
of the new frontrunner, Senator Barack Obama. He was reportedly
a strong advocate of Clintons positioning herself on the
right of the Democratic field, particularly on the issue of the
war in Iraq, and adopting the pose of presumptive nominee.
Forced by the dynamic of the campaignher two main rivals,
Obama and John Edwards, initially made a more overt appeal to
social and economic discontentas well as by the eruption
of the US financial crisis, Clinton has been compelled to strike
a more populist pose in the course of the primaries.
As a result, on one occasion after another, she has demagogically
attacked US corporations and industries that are well-paying clients
of her top campaign strategist. The list of companies that have
consulted with or hired Penn and Burson Marsteller is a rogues
gallery of corporate America:
* Blackwater Worldwide, the mercenary contractor that has killed
hundreds of Iraqis in the course of its work supplying bodyguards
for State Department and other US officials.
* Countrywide Financial, the largest US mortgage lender, which
became notorious for awarding eight-figure pay packages to CEO
Angelo Mozilo while pushing tens of thousands of subprime borrowers
into foreclosure.
* TXU Corp., a giant Texas firm seeking to build power plants
burning pulverized coal, while Clinton publicly advocates reduction
of greenhouse gases.
* Cintas Corp., a uniform rental company that Penn advised
on how to smash a union-organizing drive, while Clinton was collecting
the lions share of union endorsements.
* The giant drug companies Merck and Pfizer.
* The biggest US tobacco firm, Altria Group (formerly Philip
Morris).
* The US Tuna Foundation, which has sought to combat warnings
about mercury levels in fish.
* Royal Dutch Shell, the worlds second largest oil company,
whose US chief, John Hofmeister, met with Penn in Houston.
Penn is not some corporate gunslinger who was hired by the
Clintons for his advertising and polling expertise. He is a longtime
political operative who has parlayed his close ties with leading
figures in the Democratic Party into a lucrative corporate career.
Penn and his partner Douglas Schoen founded their polling firm
in 1977 while working for the election of Edward Koch as mayor
of New York. They plunged into Israeli politics as well, working
for the reelection campaign of Likud Prime Minister Menachem Begin
in 1981, where they utilized the Israeli air strike on the Osirak
nuclear reactor in Iraq as political propaganda.
Closely associated with the right-wing Democratic Leadership
Council, Penn worked on several campaigns for Senator Joseph Lieberman
of Connecticut. Penn managed his disastrous 2004 presidential
campaign as well as his Senate reelection campaign in 2006, when
Lieberman lost the Democratic nomination to an antiwar candidate
but retained his seat by running as an Independent Democrat
with tacit Republican support.
Penns ties to the Clintons go back to the 1996 reelection
campaign, when he worked with political adviser Dick Morris to
carry out the strategy known as triangulation, adopting
positions that would conciliate with the Republican right wing,
then in control of Congress. He later worked for Hillary Clintons
US Senate campaign in 2000.
Throughout this period, his polling and marketing business
attracted corporate customers as well. In 2001, the worlds
second-largest advertising company, WPP Group PLC, bought the
Penn Schoen firm. Penn became CEO of Burson-Marsteller, a US subsidiary
of WPP Group, in December 2005. He insisted on keeping this corporate
role when he signed on as principal strategist of Clintons
2008 presidential campaign.
Penns contract with the Colombian government is not an
aberration. A whole slew of prominent Democrats have endorsed
the US-Colombia trade pact and in some cases signed on as lobbyists.
One of the two men who replaces Penn at the top of the Clinton
campaign, campaign spokesman Howard Wolfson, has a direct financial
interest in the Glover Park Group, another lobbying firm hired
to represent Colombia.
Though Wolfson left Glover Park last year to join the campaign
full-time, he still has a million-dollar equity stake in the firm,
jointly owned with his wife Terri McCullough, who is herself the
chief of staff to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Former Clinton White
House press secretary Joe Lockhart remains a partner at Glover
Park. The firms CEO, Carl Smith, was chief of staff to the
2000 presidential campaign of Al Gore.
Hillary Clinton was at pains to disavow any connection to the
Colombia trade pact, particularly in the run-up to the April 22
Pennsylvania vote. She appeared before a meeting of the Communication
Workers of America Tuesday to reiterate, As I have said
for months, I oppose the deal, I have spoken out against the deal,
I will vote against the deal and I will do everything I can to
urge the Congress to reject the Colombia free trade agreement.
The trade union bureaucracy is opposed to every US trade deal
from the standpoint of economic protectionism, since it is allied
with the more backward and uncompetitive US industries that fear
an influx of foreign goods. In the case of Colombia, the argument
is even more heated, since the regime is notorious for its links
to right-wing death squads that have made Colombia the worlds
leader in murdering trade unionists. In one statement last week,
Clinton demanded no trade deal with Colombia while violence
against trade unionists continues in that country.
Adding to the candidates political problems, however,
is that the murder of trade unionists apparently cuts no ice with
her own husband, the former president, a long-time supporter of
the US-Colombia trade agreement. According to press reports, Colombia
was one of the many lucrative clients Bill Clinton has used to
amass his post-White House personal fortune. A Colombian business
group, Gold Service International, paid him $800,000 in 2005 for
four days of speech-making.
Campaign spokesman Jay Carson sought to dismiss the conflict
between Hillary Clintons public posture and Bill Clintons
rainmaking as though it was a dispute over the color of the carpeting
in their living room. Like other married couples who disagree
on issues from time to time, she disagrees with her husband on
this issue, he said.
See Also:
The Clintons cash in: Wealth and American
politics
[8 April 2008]
Presidential candidates
speak on housing and credit crises
Clinton, Obama, McCain defer to Wall Street
[29 March 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |