|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: France
French school students maintain protests against Sarkozys
education reforms
By Francis Dubois
26 April 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
High school students in France continued their protests in
recent weeks against the education reforms of the right-wing government
of President Nicolas Sarkozy.
Two central demonstrations took place in Paris on April 15
and 17, attended by 40,000 and 30,000 participants respectively,
from all over the metropolitan area. The majority of the protesters
were students from Paris and suburban lycées and
high schools, but substantial numbers of teachers, parents and
university students participated as well. Several teachers
unions also called on their members to strike on these two days.
On April 15 striking primary school teachers joined the secondary
schools in protesting a reform of primary schools.
Smaller demonstrations of high school students took place in
other towns of the surrounding Ile-de-France region, where protestors
blocked many lycées and collèges.
The April 17 demonstration was the seventh in three weeks.
The Paris area is now on Easter holidays for two weeks, and protests
have now began in other French regions, where schools were on
holiday over the last two weeks and have now reopened. This week
demonstrations have taken place in Strasbourg, Lille, Toulon,
Rouen, Marseilles and Tours.
State repression and intimidation have increased since protests
began last month. Gatherings of high school students in front
of their schools have been regularly confronted by armed police,
with headmasters systematically calling police as soon as students
gather in front of or block a lycée. Students have been
arrested and sent to court on the slightest pretext; some were
even DNA tested and registered.
Heavy police detachments have surrounded the protests and police
have also filmed the demonstrators. Confrontations have occurred
between groups of youth walking alongside or in front of the marches
and the police.
As in previous demonstrations, those protesting on April 17
demanded that measures announced last month by Education Minister
Xavier Darcos be withdrawn. These include the elimination of 11,200
teaching jobs, the shortening from four to three years
of courses for the baccalauréat professionnel (bac
pro, a vocational version of the general baccalauréat,
the exam at the end of secondary school allowing entry into university)
and the elimination of the BEP (Brevet détude
professionnel, a qualification that can be taken after two
years of preparing for the bac pro).
The trade unions put forward the demand for a collectif
budgétaire, an alternative budget proposal to
the finance law already voted in parliament last November, which
underlay the cuts announced by Darcos.Tthis demand is purely symbolic,
as the ruling UMP (Union for a Popular Movement) has a large majority
in parliament.
The government is preparing a whole series of other attacks
on the existing education system, none of which have been taken
up seriously by the unions. The so called Pochard report,
drafted by a commission set up by the government last September,
has proposed no less than a fundamental reorganisation of
the teaching profession. The commission included leaders
of the Socialist party like former prime minister Michel Rocard
and ex-minister of Education Jack Lang. It made a series of free-market
proposals widely criticised by the profession.
The two main high school student unions, the UNL and the FIDL,
both close to the Socialist Party, had official meetings with
Darcos on April 11 and 16. The minister of education reiterated
his commitment to imposing the job cuts and suggested that some
minor modifications could be made to his plans, regarding the
vocational baccalauréat and the BEP.
His limited remarks were seized on by the student unions, which
immediately declared that the minister was moving in their direction.
FIDL national secretary Alix Nicolet said, We obtained a
softening [of the ministers stand], and in a letter
published April 20 on the UNL web site, UNL national secretary
Florian Lecoultre wrote : The UNL has taken notice of the
will of the minister to discuss the reform of the bac pro with
high school students ...We obtained first encouraging signs such
as a guarantee to retain the BEP.
Shortly after the last meeting between Darcos and the student
unions, his office issued a statement declaring that there would
be no reconsidering the principle of a generalised bac professionnel
in three years, According to the ministry, there never
was any talk of eliminating the BEP.
Since then, these unions have been repeating at every opportunity
that they want to be constructive and seek a dialogue
with the government, while Darcos maintains his stance, clearly
calculating that with the holidays and baccalauréat exams
approaching he will be able to get his way. The call for
dialogue expresses nothing other than the resolve of the
unions to prevent a political challenge to the government.
Darcos knows he is not facing opposition from the unions, but
can count on them as political allies. One day after the April
16 demonstration, Darcos stated in a provocative interview that
the teaching of some subject matters had to be looked at from
the point of view of cost and announced the possible scrapping
of 3,000 jobs on this basis. He used the example of rare
foreign languages that could not be sustained, because too
few students use them. Education should be judged according
to the service it renders the nation, he said. Le
Monde quotes him in its April 18 edition as saying: One
has to take an interest in what education costs the nation and
in what [the nation] gets in return from the expenses it has agreed.
In parliament, answering Regis Juanico, a deputy of the Socialist
party who was demanding a moratorium on the cuts in
education, Darcos declared arrogantly: You say moratorium,
I say reform. You say suspension, I say audacity. You say lets
wait, I say lets change, adding: progress doesnt
need a moratorium.
These conflicts are taking place under conditions in which
the Sarkozy government has been destabilised and its crisis is
evident. One year after Sarkozy won the presidential election,
recent opinion polls show that two thirds of the French population
judge his presidency negatively.
Many taking part in the demonstrations consider the present
round to be just the start of further attacks over the next weeks
and months. One English teacher in Paris quoted in Nouvel Observateur
April 18 said, The cuts in teachers jobs are a run up to
the project of reforming the lycées. This is due to be
presented in May. It will contain the conclusions of the Pochard
report. Were not going to let this one go through.
Many lycéens as well as teachers are mobilised
not just against cuts in education, but also against what they
regard to be the prelude to a privatisation of education. A large
proportion of high school students and teachers oppose schools
being run like businesses, which is summed up in the opposition
to the accountants approach of the government.
Or as a banner appearing repeatedly on demonstrations said, touche
pas à mon école (dont touch my school).
The main trade unions, all of which have education sections,
have called for support for the demonstrations. But the union
bureaucracies have carefully avoided involving any other categories
of workers in the protests, although the measures directly affect
the working population and the attacks by the government are directed
at their children.
As in previous movements in education the main job of the unions
and associated political parties is to prevent any real challenge
to the government and maintain these movements on a limited trade
union perspective of putting pressure. The union bureaucracies
want to be part of its reforms not oppose them. This pro-business
agenda of the unions has already led to serious defeats in the
recent past.
In 2003 a massive eight-week strike against the reform of the
pensions in education, the decentralisation of education and the
elimination of support personnel ended in a defeat with strikers
forced to accept wage cuts for having taken strike action. In
2005 a struggle by high school students against a pro-business
law on education called Loi Fillon, after the present prime minister
and then Education Minister, Francois Fillon, was eventually passed
in the form of decrees instead of a law after some of the most
contested aspects of the law were removed.
In 2006 there was again a massive mobilisation of high school
youth and university students against the CPE (Contrat premier
emploi), but after a tactical retreat on the part of the government,
the Loi sur légalité des chances, (Law
on the equality of opportunities) of which the CPE was a part,
was maintained. In 2007 there was a long struggle by university
students against the Loi Pécresse for the autonomy
of the universities, which ended up in a victory for the government.
These movements were each time crippled by a limited union
perspective, based on an unspoken pro-market programme that opposed
any political challenge to the ruling elite, and on that
basis was encouraged by the so called left
and far left. The government that led the offensive
against the gains of the working class was left in place, able
to prepare another attack or an orderly transition to another,
more right-wing bourgeois government.
Whats needed is a political movement of the whole working
class against the Sarkozy government on the basis of a socialist
programme. For that to succeed, a political break is necessary
with the unions and the parties of the official left and far
left. High school students and teachers should reject organisations
which share the same basic political agenda as this conservative
government and take the struggle into their own hands.
See Also:
France: union reforms highlight Sarkozy-CGT
alliance
[25 April 2008]
French government slashes public spending
[14 April 2008]
French high school students protest education
cuts
[12 April 2008]
French local elections reveal
discrediting of political establishment
[18 March 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |