|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Film
Reviews
Lust, Caution: political intrigue in Japanese-occupied
China
By Richard Phillips
29 February 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Directed by Ang Lee, screenplay by Wang Hui Ling and James
Schamus and based on the short story Se, Jei by Eileen
Chang
In the sixteen years since his first feature in 1992, Taiwan-born
director Ang Lee has produced an eclectic and artistically inconsistent
range of films. Some early movies, such as The Wedding Banquet
(1993), a comedy about a gay Taiwanese man living in New York
who tries to salvage relations with his Taipei-based parents by
organising a fake marriage in the US; Sense and Sensibility
(1997), Lees version of Jane Austens famous novel;
and Ride with the Devil (1999), about young Missouri men
caught up in a pro-slavery border ruffian terror group
during the American Civil Warwere interesting although not
ground-breaking efforts.
Multi-million dollar productions that followed, however, such
as Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000) and Hulk
(2003) were overblown and empty and seemed to indicate that Lee
had lost his way. In fact, the US-based director has since admitted
that he was seriously disillusioned after directing Hulk
and had considered making it his last film.
Lee returned to form in 2005 with the Oscar-winning Brokeback
Mountain and last year won numerous accolades, including the
Venice Film Festivals Golden Lion award, for his latest
movie Lust, Caution. Both movies were made for about $15
million, small amounts by contemporary filmmaking standards, and
are arguably his best films to date.
Lust, Caution (Se, Jei), which is based on a short story
by popular Shanghai-born writer Eileen Chang (1920-95), is a sexually-charged
thriller set from 1938 to 1942 in Japanese occupied China, a period
largely untouched by European and American filmmakers. It tells
the story of a young actress caught up in a dangerous and personally
disorienting assassination plot against a leading pro-Japanese
collaborator.
Lees 157-minute film has its limitationsan issue
we will return to laterbut it does provide some sense of
the dark days of the Japanese occupation, events that one hopes
other filmmakers will further explore.
The story begins in Shanghai at the Japanese military-protected
compound of the Wang Jingwei quisling government and briefly introduces
us to its key protagonists. Its 1942. There is a mahjong
game underway and the well-heeled women gossip about jewelry and
other petty concerns. But there are furtive glances and the movie
soon indicates something unsettling and dangerous is being prepared.
Lust, Caution then flashes back to four years earlier
and to Hong Kong where young drama student Wong Chai-chi (Tang
Wei) has fled to escape the Japanese military. She makes friends
with some drama students, led by Kuang Yu-min (Wang Leehom), who
perform anti-occupation agitprop theatre. Wong eventually becomes
their principal actress.
Despite local success, the students are impatient with their
theatrical gestures and hatch a plan to murder Mr Yee (Tony Leung),
a local collaborator with the Japanese. Wong is assigned the most
dangerous roleher task is to masquerade as a Mrs Mak,
the bored wife of a young businessman, seduce Yee and thereby
create the conditions for his elimination. Notwithstanding their
careful preparations the plot fails and the students are confronted
with a bloody and disturbing denouement. In the ensuing chaos
Wong flees, leaving the group to its fate.

The story moves forward three years to 1941 and Wong has returned
to Shanghai. She is living with relatives and has resumed her
studies. Yee, likewise, has come back to Shanghai, this time to
head the quisling regimes ruthless secret police. Former
members of the Hong Kong drama group have also relocated to the
city and are now involved in one of Chiang Kia-sheks nationalist
Kuomintang (KMT) assassination groups.
Wong is eventually discovered by the students and introduced
to their KMT handler. He asks her to reprise her role as Mrs
Mak, promising that she will be given sanctuary in Britain
after the assassination. Wong agrees and successfully inveigles
her way into the Yee household where she eventually arouses Mr
Yees interest.
What follows is a series of complex sexual encounters. Does
Yee suspect Wong and is he just stringing her along? Does the
odious and grasping Mrs Yee (Joan Chen), and her circle of gossiping
wives, suspect her husband is having an affair? Is Yee anything
more other than a cold blooded killer? Does she have the experience
and internal strength to maintain this dangerous and psychologically
destabilising charade?
Yee is tight-lipped about his work but there are
chilling references to torture and assassination and he is shown
burning documents in the dead of night. At the same time there
is an overarching sense that the quisling rulers and their Japanese
military protectors are on borrowed time. Yee admits at one point:
I listen to men all day, so-called prominent politicians
and the like, talking their supposed serious talk. And you know
what? No matter what high-sounding words come out of their mouths,
I see only one thing in their eyes ... fear.
The sex scenes in Lust, Caution have attracted much
media comment, most of it sensationalist and superficial, and
last year the movie was given an N-17 or Not 17 or under
rating by Motion Picture Association of America, which limited
its US distribution. Malaysian censors have slashed the film by
15 minutes and Lee agreed to cut seven minutes from the movie
in order to secure a release in China. The graphic sexual encounters,
however, are not gratuitous but an important element in the complex
and contradictory tension that develops between the movies
key protagonists.
Wong hopes that she can deal with Yee and fulfill her mission
but with each sexual encounter she becomes more enmeshed. At one
point she clashes with her KMT handler over these difficulties
but all he has to offer is a stern lecture that she must be loyal
to the cause.
Lust, Caution slowly builds to a climax and has some
mesmerising moments. These include its skillful transitions from
the claustrophobic quisling compound and wealthy Shanghai shopping
districts, to the citys poverty-stricken laneways. There
are food queues; local undertakers routinely sift through the
homeless, sorting out those killed by disease and starvation from
the barely alive; and there are fleeting glimpses of corpses lying
in major city streets, obviously hunted down by death squads.
Office workers and others rush past in silence. The films
final street scene, as Wong hails a cycle-cab outside a jewelry
store only to be stopped a short while later at a police/military
roadblock, is hypnotic and disquieting.
Several American reviewers have criticised Lees movie
for its length and for being too slow and unfavourably contrasted
it with Black Book (2006), a fast-paced action thriller
about the Dutch anti-Nazi resistance, by Paul Verhoeven. While
Black Book achieved some popular success in Holland and
other European cinemas, Verhoevens movie is a glossy, superficial
and deeply cynical movie with an underlying message that everyone
is venal and can be bought.
Some Chinese commentators have claimed that Lust Caution
denigrates women involved in the anti-Japanese resistance and
suggested the film is too sympathetic towards Yee. Such critics
are looking, not for serious artistic work that sensitises audiences
and encourages them to think more deeply, but for political clichés
and heroic posturing to reinforce pre-conceived ideas.
That said, Lust, Caution is not without its problems.
Lee obviously feels deeply about the Japanese occupation and has
spoken in several interviews about the importance of understanding
this period. His comments, however, are exceedingly vague and
one senses that he doesnt want to step on anyones
political toes, particularly in China, Japan or in his birthplace
Taiwan, where this period remains a deeply explosive issue.
Lust, Caution, carefully avoids any mention of the Rape
of Nanking, when the Japanese military conquered the then capital
of the Chinese republic in December 1937 and for the next six
weeks massacred more than 300,000 of the citys inhabitants.
In fact, the film refuses to explore any of the major political
events in China from 1938-42 when the story is set. This ensures
that Lees portrayal of the young drama students, who were
obviously horrified by the Japanese occupation, is perfunctory
and unsatisfying. Nor is there any serious attempt made to explore
Wongs political motivations; her actions are largely left
on the level of personal psychology.
Lee might argue in his defence that he has followed the spirit
of Changs short story, which is no doubt true. But the director
is not legally or artistically bound to the original story. Lee,
like Chang has chosen to make the central preoccupation of Lust,
Caution an investigation of what is strongest in Wong and
Yees relationshippersonal emotion or political commitment.
Some audiences will recognise that Lust, Caution has
an eerie resonance with events in Iraq and Afghanistan, where
Machiavellian intrigue, fear, torture and bloody repression is
part of daily life for US-led occupiers. These issues and the
broader question of how imperialist occupation and war destroys
and distorts all civilised human relations, however, are not the
primary concern of Lees movie, which reduces everything
to psychological questions with history, politics and class relations
left as a scenic backdrop.
Lust, Caution is a fascinating and at times visually
compelling work but one that unfortunately avoids too many key
questions.
See Also:
Two recent films:
Brokeback Mountain and Walk the Line
[5 January 2006]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |