|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : Canada
Canadian university forces locked-out faculty to vote on final
offer
By our reporter
28 January 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
St. Thomas University has invoked an anti-worker provision
of New Brunswicks labor code to force 160 full- and part-time
faculty, now in their fifth week of a strike-lockout, to vote
on its final contract offer.
The vote, which is to be conducted by the provinces labor
relations board, will be held today and Tuesday.
The forced vote is the latest step in an aggressive campaign
led by the Board of Governors of St. Thomas Universitya
publicly-funded, liberal arts college located in Frederictonto
cripple, if not outright break, the faculty union, which is affiliated
with the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT).
In mid-December, the university announced that contract negotiations
could only continue if its contract proposals were accepted as
the framework of a settlement. After the faculty refused to be
cowed, the administration announced it would ask the labor relations
board to hold a final offer vote on January 3rd, and,
in the event of a rejection, immediately lock out the faculty.
After the union raised logistical concerns about holding a
contract vote when many faculty might still be away, the administration
withdrew its call for a provincial government-supervised final-offer
vote. Instead it locked out the faculty, beginning on December
27.
The administration continued to brandish the threat of a forced
vote in the subsequent weeks and ultimately carried through with
it, after a special, government-appointed mediator withdrew from
contract talks late on the night of Sunday, January 20.
The prerogative of an employer to force a government-supervised
vote on its final offer was introduced into the provincial
labor code in 1994, by the right-wing provincial Liberal government
of Frank McKenna. McKenna sought to make New Brunswick a magnet
for investment, particularly in the call-center sector,
by slashing corporate taxes and public services.
According to a labor department representative, employers rarely
make use of the final offer provision. This is because
it is so blunt an anti-union weapon. Should workers accept a contract
in an employer-forced final offer vote, they are legally
compelled to return to work under conditions where they do not
have a negotiated back-to-work agreement, making them much more
vulnerable to employer reprisals.
The university began the contract negotiations with demands
for concessions that threatened academic freedom by, among other
things, making support for the universitys historical Catholic
identity a criterion in hiring and promotion. Although the
Board of Governors was ultimately forced to drop these demands,
it clearly sees a goring of the union as important in pushing
forward with a right-wing agenda for the university, that includes
tying its curriculum more closely to big business demands and
adopting the Vaticans Ex Corde Ecclesiae, (an apostolic
constitution for Catholic universities promulgated by the late
Pope John Paul II).
The universitys final offer falls far short
of the facultys demands. Part-time faculty who give
36 percent of the universitys classes for meager stipends
of less, and in some cases substantially less, than $5000 per
course are to be given wage increases of just 5 percent
per year in a three-year contract. Smaller percentage wage increases,
for the admittedly much better paid, full-time faculty are tied
to their assuming full responsibility for funding the long-term
disability program.
The university has agreed that tenured and tenure-track faculty
will only have to teach five courses per academic year, the Canadian-norm.
But its contract offer contains language that would enable the
administration to circumvent the 60-student per class cap on enrollment
won in the last contract. The university also wants to suspend
for the life of the coming contract, clauses that mandate a review
of whether additional full-time faculty need to be hired when
limits on the percentage of courses being taught by non-tenured/non-tenure
track faculty are exceeded.
The corporate media has strongly supported the university in
its attempt to incite students against the faculty by claiming
that their contract demands will result in higher tuition.
CAUT, for its part, has restricted the strike to the narrowest
collective-bargaining framework. It has refused to aggressively
challenge the claims of the administration and press, by linking
the faculty contract struggle to a broader movement in defense
of public education and public services.
As part of its propaganda war against the faculty, the administration
announced last week that it was lifting the lockout, but faculty
continued to be denied use of their e-mail, the university web-server,
and their offices. In other words, the lockout continues in all
but name.
The university has told students via its website that it has
a plan in the event its final offers are
rejected respectively by the full and part-time faculty units,
but it has refused to divulge what that plan is.
The Board of Governors may well be planning to appeal to the
provincial Liberal government of Sean Graham to legislate the
faculty back-to-work. While the Liberal government has said nothing
of substance about the labor dispute at St. Thomas, it is taking
a hard line against a strike launched on January 10 by five hundred
provincial government employees, including community college custodians,
jail guards, prison cooks, and human service counselors.
See Also:
Canadian university locks out faculty
[7 January 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |