|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Watchdog warns that corporations financial viability
is at risk
By Jean Shaoul
2 January 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The worlds press has been focused on the financial fallout
for the banks from the credit squeeze and the crisis of liquidity
following the collapse of the sub-prime mortgage market in the
US. This has seen the worlds largest banks write off billions
of dollars of assets and seek extra funding to balance their books.
Less has been said about how all this will affect other corporations,
their workers and the economy as a whole.
A short but unprecedented press release from the Financial
Reporting Council (FRC), the UK corporate reporting regulator,
demonstrates just how closely the financial sector and the real
economy are connected and the devastating impact the turmoil
in the worlds financial markets will have on major corporations
in Britain and around the world.
Paul Boyle, the FRCs chief executive, addressed himself
to big business and the audit industry, which scrutinises the
corporations annual accounts before giving them a clean
bill of health. He couched his words in technical terms but could
not disguise the scale of the crisis as corporations approach
their financial year-end and prepare their annual report and accounts.
His denial that there was any reason to panic only served to underline
the alarm now permeating the more perceptive layers within the
City.
Boyle said that the recent credit crunch and the fall in the
value of sophisticated debt instruments, shares and other financial
assets mean that the risks to confidence in corporate reporting
and governance are higher than they have been for some years.
These increased risks require additional diligence on
the part of preparers of accounts, members of audit committees
and auditors this year, he continued. If all players
in the reporting chain do their jobs properly and are diligent
about judgements, there is no reason to believe things wont
go well, but clearly risks are higher than normal this year, though
we are not suggesting any cause for panic.
Boyle warned that companies reliant on short-term credit for
long-term debt would find it harder to obtain credit in the coming
period. With levels of corporate debt running at unprecedented
levels in order to finance not investment in new productive capacity
but entirely parasitic activities such as mergers and takeovers
of other companies at grossly inflated prices, many companies
are likely to run into difficulty.
Corporations will be forced to write down the value of their
assets, which include not just bricks-and-mortar assets such as
property, and real estate, whose prices are expected to fall,
but also financial assets whose value has already fallen sharply.
This will affect not just the financial services sectorthe
largest sector in Britainbut also property companies, and
the big high street chains whose credit card subsidiaries have
been in some cases, at least, the most profitable part of the
business.
Many companies now value their assets at fair or
market value, rather than the more traditional historic cost,
the price they originally paid. But with many financial markets
drying up, market prices are now more difficult to
determine.
When asset values were rising, the corporations could use them
as collateral to borrow ever more loans. Now as their asset values
plummet, borrowing will become ever more difficult. The write
down in assets will be a charge against profits.
Some of the most highly indebted companies in Britain today
are the former state-owned enterprises: the infrastructure industries,
transport and utilities. Their essential nature means that they
cannot be allowed to fall prey to the ultimate sanction of the
marketbankruptcymeaning that either the state must
step in or the economic regulator, where there is one, must allow
prices to rise sharply. Either way, the public will bear the cost.
The FRC called for detailed consideration of potential
impairments to assets as the main accounting issue, as well as
due care and diligence of the valuation based on market
prices.
The financial sector has got a great deal of attention,
but the way this is playing out means that companies outside the
sector could be affected in ways that are not immediately obvious.
We want to encourage them to think through the implications,
Boyle said.
He added that the accounting standards used to prepare the
annual accounts leave plenty of room for judgement,
which could lead to serious mistakes. Thats the sort
of thing that really gives corporate reporting a bad name and
what we want to try to avoid, he added.
Corporate reporting always involves the use of estimates
and the exercise of judgement and those estimates and judgements
are likely to be particularly challenging this year, he
warned.
Boyle also warned about the business review, the section in
the annual report where executives discuss the outlook for the
coming year and the main uncertainties and risks confronting the
business. It wont be too convincing, if there are
difficulties in 2008, for companies to say when we signed
off we didnt think about that, Boyle said.
A recent survey by the accountancy firm BDO Stoy Hayward confirmed
that the credit crunch is being felt in several business sectors
and by both large and small companies. A large minority of finance
directors believed that their companies do not have sufficient
access to finance. But a staggering 30 percent of finance directors
said that they never assess the impact of the current economic
conditions on their business. More than a third had failed to
carry out a thorough analysis of the financial health of their
business in the previous six months.
Mike Prangley, the business restructuring partner at BDO Stoy
Hayward, told the Guardian, Some corporates are showing
signs of reluctance to accept there are problems. This is definitely
a cause for concern and suggests some management teams have their
heads in the sand, especially with uncertain times ahead.
At the heart of the FRCs concerns lay the fear that many
companies would not receive the going concern assurancebased
upon the Board of Directors and the auditors judgement
that the business is sound and has sufficient financing in place
for 12 months from the date that the accounts are signed off.
Auditors cannot issue a clean bill of health on a companys
accounts without certifying that it is a going concern.
Many companies will be forced to find additional sources of
finance under conditions where everyone else is doing the same.
That is why the central banks took such unprecedented steps to
inject liquidity into the financial markets. It is not just the
banks financial position that is at stake but that of the
corporate sector as well.
Mindful of previous accounting scandals whose origins lay in
an attempt to disguise the true state of affairs, the FRCs
statement was a not too subtle warning to top management and their
auditors not to cook the books as others had done when boom turned
to bust. Any attempt to conceal the worst effects of the credit
crunch would soon unravel, giving rise to an accounting scandal.
That, in todays circumstances, would further undermine the
credibility of corporate profits, the corporate reporting regulator,
and thus the position of London as a leading international financial
centre, already under threat after the collapse of Northern Rock.
While the FRC speaks on behalf of the financial elite whose
concern is with their own profits, it nevertheless makes clear
just how parasitic British corporations have becomedependent
on financial engineering and creative accounting rather than the
production of goods and services for their profitsand how
closely entangled they are with the financial sector. It also
points to the devastating impact the credit crunch will have on
the livelihoods of ordinary people as major corporations collapse,
jobs go, mortgage costs and debt servicing rise, and homes are
repossessed.
Above all, the FRC fears the political backlash that will follow
a wider economic meltdown from working people against the neo-liberal
economic agenda that has dominated politics for nearly three decades.
As long as finance capitalism was able to deliver jobs, however
insecure and poorly paid, and provide a means of accessing cheap
credit to purchase lifes necessities, then it faced little
political challenge. Now, the chain of events set in motion by
the US sub-prime mortgage crisis threatens to topple the economic
conditions that sustained the political dominance of the financial
and corporate elite.
See Also:
Record fall in US
home prices
[27 December 2007]
Britain: Northern
Rock crisis deepens
[21 December 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |