|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : South
& Central America
Colombian rebel leader sentenced to 60 years over captured
contractors
By Bill Van Auken
31 January 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
A Washington, DC federal court Monday handed down a draconian
60-year sentence against a leader and negotiator for the Revolutionary
Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a guerrilla movement that has
been in conflict with Colombian government forces for 40 years.
Ricardo Palmera was indicted on terrorism and drug-trafficking
charges and extradited from Colombia at the end of 2004. He was
convicted last July on a single count of conspiracy to take hostages
in connection with the 2003 capture of three US military contractors
whose plane was downed over FARC-held territory in southern Colombia.
The contractors, employed by Northrop Grumman Corporation,
were flying surveillance flights and relaying intelligence to
the Colombian armed forces. They have been held by the guerrilla
movement as prisoners of war.
No attempt was made by prosecutors to prove that Palmera had
given the order to shoot down the spy plane or had anything to
do with the contractors capture and detention. Indeed, all
evidence indicates that he never laid eyes on the three. The sole
basis of the charges was that he was a member of FARC, which the
US State Department classified as a foreign terrorist organization
under the Clinton administration, at a time when Washington stepped
up its military intervention in Colombia and transformed its so-called
war on drugs into an open counterinsurgency campaign,
which Washington has funded to the tune of $5 billion.
The prosecution, conviction and sentencing of Palmera constitutes
a significant escalation and broadening of the so-called global
war on terror, which is now being utilized as a pretext
for applying US law extraterritorially to suppress opponents of
a US-backed regime in Latin America.
Palmera, who was known in the FARC by his nom de guerre, Simon
Trinidad, was abducted in Quito, Ecuador in January 2004. He had
gone there to meet with James LeMoyne, the United Nations special
advisor on Colombia, apparently to discuss a possible prisoner
exchange, including that of the three US military contractors.
Palmera was tracked by US and Colombian intelligence, which asked
Ecuadorian authorities to arrest him. He was sent back to Colombia,
whose government, by the end of 2004, took the unprecedented decision
of extraditing him to the US to stand trial.
Palmera was first tried in 2006, but the jury was unable to
reach a verdict because of the lack of any evidence linking him
directly to the capture or detention of the crew of the US spy
plane. The government immediately moved to prosecute him again
on the same charges.
For more than three years, he has been imprisoned under extremely
harsh conditions in the US, condemned to solitary confinement
in a federal prison and denied the right to receive visits from
family, friends and even his Colombian defense attorney.
In ordering Palmera imprisoned for 60 years without parole,
US District Judge Royce Lamberth acted at the direct request of
the US Justice Department. The maximum sentence under federal
guidelines would have been life in prison without parole. However,
the Colombian government had asked for the 60-year sentenceinstead
of a formal life termin its extradition agreement. Obviously,
for the 57-year-old Palmera, the effect is the same.
The sentence is just one more indication that the trial of
Palmera was a politically directed intervention by the US government
in Colombias politics aimed at propping up the right-wing
government of President Alvaro Uribe and scuttling any negotiations
with the FARC guerrillas.
In imposing the sentence, both federal prosecutors and Judge
Lamberthwho previously served as head of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Courtdenounced Palmera as a terrorist. This
was and is an act of terrorism, a barbaric act that is against
the laws of all civilized nations, he said, referring to
the capture and detention of the downed US military contractors.
He went on to compare the FARC leader to Osama bin Laden.
The reality, of course, is that Colombia is in a state of war
that has existed for at least four decades. Both the government
and the FARC have taken prisoners and there have been repeated
negotiations and international mediations between the two sides.
The holding of US contractorsacting as proxies for actual
Colombian or American troopsis certainly far more justifiable
than the truly barbaric US abduction and detention of tens of
thousands of Iraqis swept up by American occupation troops.
Palmeras court-appointed defense attorney, Robert Tucker,
objected to the judges reference to Osama bin Laden and
once again said that his client had played no direct role in the
imprisonment of the contractors. He never saw them, never
talked to them, he has nothing to do with their abduction,
he said. Tucker had argued that the appropriate sentence should
have been five to six years, and pointed out that precedents invoked
by the prosecution involved cases in which defendants had participated
personally in the crimes and, in some cases, had killed those
they had kidnapped.
Tucker touched briefly on the key issue in the case, declaring,
The idea that there is no war in Colombia is absolutely
fantastic. He pointed out that the type of negotiations
Palmera was engaged in when captured in Quito was well established.
You cannot divorce this case from the Colombian conflict,
he added. What the US and the government of Colombia want
is to win this war.
Palmera himself addressed the court, defending his actions
politically. A former banker from a privileged background, he
had joined the FARC after first participating in a legal left-wing
political party, Union Patriotica, formed in the 1980s. While
the party gained substantial support, it was subjected to ferocious
repression by the US-backed government and its death squads, with
over 5,000 of its members assassinated, including hundreds of
elected officials and candidates. This bloodbath effectively destroyed
the organization.
He pointed to the conditions of savage repression and stark
social inequality that continue in Colombia, where over half the
population lives in poverty, surviving on $1 to $2 a day. The
countrys resources, he said, were monopolized by a small
ruling elite in alliance with foreign capital. To maintain this
system, the oligarchy utilized political violence, including assassination,
forced disappearance and torture.
He denied that either he or the FARC were terrorist, and said
that it was state terrorism that had led him into the ranks of
the guerrilla movement. He also disputed Washingtons attempt
to blame Colombias cocaine trafficking on FARC, which does
receive substantial funds from cocaine growers in areas under
its control. He pointed out that Washingtons own intelligence
reports had exposed the ties between Colombian President Uribe
and the late drug lord Pablo Escobar.
Palmera denounced the judicial proceedings against him as political
from top to bottom and said that the Uribe governments
decision to send him to the US for trial was part of a neo-colonial
practice that damages the sovereignty of our country.
When I joined the FARC, I did so conscious that I could
lose my life for freedom and the struggle for social justice,
he said. Today I lose my physical liberty, but my ideals
remain intact.
He called for a humanitarian exchange of prisoners in Colombia
and expressed his desire to see the US contractors released. It
is my sincere desire that Thomas Howes, Marc Gonsalves and Keith
Stansell return as soon as possible alive and well to their homes,
together with their loved-ones, he said.
The FARC responded to Palmeras sentencing by offering
to exchange the three US military contractors for his release
and that of a second member of the guerrilla organization imprisoned
in the US. Give us back our guerrilla members and well
give you your three spies, the FARC message read.
Thomas Shannon, the US undersecretary of state for Latin American
affairs, immediately rejected any such exchange. Palmera, he claimed,
committed a crime, was tried and convicted in a process
in which he was given all of the guarantees, while the Americans
have not committed any crime and are being held against their
will.
The reality is that Palmera and his imprisoned comrade have
been subjected to the same kind of American justice
as those who have been abducted, tortured and imprisoned in Guantánamo,
Abu Ghraib and other CIA and military prisons around the world.
The aim of his trial was to turn resistance to the US imperialist
intervention in Colombia and to the right-wing US-backed regime
that is responsible for the killing of thousands of Colombian
workers and peasants into a criminal offense that can be prosecuted
in Washington, DC.
All those concerned about the assault on democratic rights
in the US and the criminal actions of the US government around
the world must demand the immediate and unconditional release
of the two FARC prisoners.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |