|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Middle
East : Iraq
The state of Iraq as it enters 2008
By James Cogan
2 January 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Media reports about New Year parties in parts of Baghdad cannot
disguise the fact that Iraqis have little to look forward to in
2008, and even less to celebrate about 2007. Last year was yet
another of death, destruction and suffering. Even the incomplete
data compiled by the Associated Presswhich only include
reported deaths and exclude so-called insurgents who were killed
in combat with US and Iraqi government forcesshow that at
least 18,610 civilians died as a result of violence. Tens of thousands
more deaths were caused by the effects of malnutrition, unsafe
drinking water, depleted uranium contamination and a dysfunctional
health system.
2007 will be remembered as the year in which the British-based
polling agency ORB estimated that 1.2 million Iraqis had been
killed under the US occupation, substantiating the death toll
previously calculated by scientists working with Johns Hopkins
University. It will also go down as the year when more than one
million Iraqis were forced to flee their homes to escape the sectarian
violence fomented and encouraged by the policies of US imperialism.
The surge of 30,000 additional US troops to the country
between March and June was accompanied by arguably the worst ethnic-communal
cleansing in Iraqs modern history.
UNICEF published statistics on December 21 revealing the level
of social destruction: just 28 percent of Iraqi 17-year-olds sat
for their final school exams in 2007 while the violence prevented
close to one million children from attending primary school.
Such figures underscore the charge leveled by the WSWS on May
24, 2007 that the architects of the Iraq invasion had committed
sociocidethe deliberate and systematic murder of an
entire societyin order to seize the countrys
territory and oil resources for the benefit of the American corporate
establishment. For these war crimes, the perpetrators in the Bush
administration and allied governments must be brought to account.
Thousands of American and British military families have paid
a bitter price. More occupation troops were killed in Iraq in
2007 than any other year since the March 2003 invasion. A total
of 901 American, 47 British and nine soldiers from other occupying
countries lost their lives. Cumulative US casualties in the illegal
war now stand at 3,904 dead and 28,661 woundedmany of whom
have suffered brain damage, lost limbs or suffered other permanent
injuries. A further 30,185 soldiers have had to be medically evacuated
for non-hostile wounds, such as disease and psychological
disorders. At least 132 American troops have committed suicide
in the war-torn country.
2008 will see the killing and maiming continue. In his final
press conference for the year on December 29, the American commander
in Iraq, General David Petraeus poured cold water on declarations
that the US troop surge had brought the country under
US control. While noting the decline in US casualties over the
previous three monthsfatalities were the lowest since early
2004he warned that inevitably there will be tough
fighting, more tough days and more tough weeks, but fewer of them,
god willing.
Petraeuss warning stemmed from the clearly temporary
nature of the modest lessening of risks for American troops. The
ebb in attacks on occupation forces stems not from any change
in the overwhelming Iraqi opposition to the US presence, or from
any improvement in the catastrophic living conditions facing the
majority of Iraqis. Rather, it flows from a series of desperate
deals, orchestrated by Petraeus, to buy off a number of largely
Sunni Arab-based insurgent groups and secure a ceasefire with
the main Shiite fundamentalist opposition to the occupation, the
Mahdi Army of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr.
These deals are beginning to unravel. There are at least 77,000
Sunni militiamen being paid by the US military in western Iraq
and in Sunni enclaves inside and around Baghdad. Their leaders,
many of whom have links to the previous Baathist regime of Saddam
Hussein, are seeking a greater political role through a sordid
sectarian power-sharing arrangement with the Shiite fundamentalist
and Kurdish nationalist parties that dominate the US puppet government
in Baghdad. In the process, all factions are setting themselves
in direct opposition to the hopes and aspirations of ordinary
Iraqi working people of all sects and ethnic groups.
Already, some two million Iraqi refugees in Syria and Jordan
are being told they cannot necessarily return home. Whether they
can or not will depend on whether they belong to the same sect
as the one whose militia now controls their home suburb. Thousands
of Shiites are being prevented from entering areas under Sunni
militia authority and which are, in many cases, sealed off by
US-erected 12-foot concrete walls. At the same time, tens of thousands
of Sunnis and Christians driven out by Shiite militias face losing
everything. The Mahdi Army, as part of Sadrs deal with Petraeus,
has taken over large swathes of Baghdad and rules it as a sectarian
fiefdom on behalf of the cleric.
Anger at the US-negotiated carve-up of the city and the elevation
of militias is amplified by the inability of the occupation to
provide jobs or basic services. Combined unemployment and underemployment
in areas such as Sadr City stands at up to 70 percent, and new
outbreaks of resistance are inevitable.
Across the Shiite-populated south of Iraq, the situation is
equally volatile. Sadrs arrangement with the occupation
has meant, in practical terms, abandoning his predominantly working
class supporters to the US military and the Supreme Islamic Iraqi
Council (SIIC)the largest pro-occupation Shiite party and
the representative of the most powerful Shiite business and clerical
elites. As a result, hundreds of Sadrist militiamen have been
branded rogue elements, hunted down and detained or
killed.
Observers of Iraqi politics are noting the growth of disaffection
within the Sadrist base over the consequences of Sadrs horse-trading
and collaboration with the US forces. Peter Harling of the International
Crisis Group told McClatchy Newspapers last month: I dont
know how sustainable this can be. They [Sadrs supporters]
appear extremely frustrated, willing to comply with Moqtadas
decision [the ceasefire], but not for very long.
According to an article in the December 26 Washington Post,
large numbers have been rounded up in Najaf, Karbala, Hilla and
Diwaniya. There are indications that the US military, along with
Iraqi government forces loyal to SIIC, are preparing a crackdown
against Sadrist and Sadrist-linked parties, militias and unions
in the oil-rich city of Basra. The operation has the potential
to be the first major blood-letting of the New Year and to unleash
anti-occupation rebellions across southern Iraq.
As the killing continues, various quarters of the US ruling
elite are exploiting the very carnage they have produced to argue
that American forces must remain in Iraq to establish the conditions
for democracy. Such propaganda is nothing more than
a shameless apology for the first great and ongoing war crime
of the twenty-first century. The occupation is ruling through
the promotion of sectarian divisions and the daily repression
of opposition to its presence. The precondition for Iraqs
recovery from the social and political catastrophe created by
the US-led war is the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of
all American and foreign troops.
See Also:
US occupation prepares
Basra operation following British withdrawal
[29 December 2007]
What has the US "surge"
in Iraq accomplished?
[24 December 2007]
British polling agency:
More than one million Iraqi deaths since US invasion
[15 September 2007]
US officials guilty
of sociocide in Iraq must be held accountable
[24 May 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |