|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America
Sentencing begins in Jose Padilla trial
By Naomi Spencer
9 January 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
At a sentencing hearing Tuesday in a Florida federal district
court, lawyers for Jose Padilla and two other men raised nearly
100 objections to a government pre-sentencing report, after asking
for disclosure of government records pertaining to Padillas
case.
The disclosure request, submitted Monday, follows revelations
that the CIA destroyed video recordings of prisoner interrogations
involving waterboarding, a practice widely condemned as torture.
Abu Zubaydah, one of those interrogated on the destroyed tapes,
reportedly implicated Jose Padilla as an Al Qaeda member.
Padilla, an American citizen detained illegally on invented
dirty bomb plot charges in 2002, was held in a military
brig for three-and-a-half years under the most abusive conditions.
Prosecutors are pushing for life sentences for Padilla, Adham
Amin Hassoun, and Kifah Wael Jayyousi, who were convicted in August
on two counts of material support for terrorism and one count
of conspiracy to murder, kidnap and maim people overseas. The
governments allegations of a plot to detonate a radioactive
dirty bomb in a major American city were dropped before
any criminal charges were brought, and no specific acts of terrorism,
violence, or plans for terrorism were tied to any of the convicted
men.
District judge Marcia Cooke, a Bush appointee, rejected the
defense teams disclosure request outright Monday, saying
she had reviewed relevant material and concluded that the
government had handed over all the required evidence, according
to a January 8 report in the New York Times.
Kenneth Swartz, representing Hassounallegedly Padillas
recruiter into terrorismrequested access to classified information
relating to the interrogation of another alleged Al Qaeda operative
known as Uways. Uways claimed to have interviewed Padilla with
others about deployment to an Afghanistan training
camp, according to the Times. Defense lawyers have been
provided only an unclassified summary of the interrogation,
the paper said.
On Tuesday, defense lawyers told the Miami Herald that
the governments court report contained numerous inaccuracies
and mischaracterizations of evidence presented during the trial
that were intended to reinforce the governments recommendation
for maximum life sentences.
The defense attorneys are pressing for sentences ranging from
21 months to 10 years because of the lack of substantive evidence
in the governments case, and in Padillas case, extreme
mental damage inflicted upon him during his detention. Surely,
the court, in arriving at a just sentence for Mr. Padilla,
the defense stated in a brief on the governments report,
should take into account that he will serve his sentence
in hell.
The Florida Sun-Sentinel quoted the prosecutions
counter filing, which characterized any request for leniency as
absurd and unconvincing. These arguments
demonstrate again that the defendants still have no conception
of the seriousness of their crimes...the idea of reducing a terrorists
sentence up front because he may be treated as such in prison
defies belief, the prosecution brief declared.
On January 5, Padilla filed a lawsuit in a California district
court against a former Bush administration appointee for his role
in crafting legal justification for torture and other abuses he
was subjected to during his military detention. The suit seeks
damages of one dollar and a ruling declaring many abuses illegal.
Thats what Padilla directed us to ask for, Jonathan
Freiman, one of Padillas lawyers, told the New York Times.
At bottom, this isnt about money. Its about
right and wrong.
The appointee, former Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, drafted
the series of so-called torture memos in 2002 that provided the
legal dressing for flagrantly illegal activities, including secret
and indefinite detention, denial of access to the courts, and
confinements and interrogations in violation of human rights.
As deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel
(OLC) in the Department of Justice, Yoo was a key member of the
executive branchs War Council. Padillas
lawyers state that the Justice Department largely delegated
OLCs war-on-terrorism responsibilities to Yoo.
The Bush administration was eager to create a case around Padilla
at the time of his detainment. In the first place, controversy
surrounding the governments knowledge of potential terrorist
attacks before September 11, 2001, was emerging. Padillas
capture was heralded as a victory in the war on terror,
while simultaneously serving as legitimization of detainment of
American citizens, indefinite detention, and other breaches of
basic democratic rights.
The brief filed January 4 by Padillas lawyers states
that he was subjected to gross physical and psychological
abuse at the hands of federal officials as part of a systematic
program of abusive interrogation intended to break down Mr. Padillas
humanity and his will to live.
Violations of Padillas basic rightsincluding his
access to lawyers, family, information, and the courts for yearswere
not isolated aberrations of the legal system. Rather, Padillas
lawyers assert, Yoo, along with other senior officials,
deliberately removed Mr. Padilla from due process protections
traditionally available to US citizens detained by their government
and barred all access to the outside world, including access to
counsel. Yoo personally provided numerous legal memoranda
that purported to provide to senior government officials a legal
basis to implement an extreme and unprecedented interrogation
and detention programeven though such tactics are unprecedented
in US history and clearly contrary to the US Constitution and
the law of war.
Details of Padillas experience at the hands of the US
government paint a horrendous picture. The brief states that he
was subjected to complete isolation save aggressive and brief
contact from his interrogators for months at a time. He was even
blindfolded and had his ears plugged to continue sensory deprivation
during a dental exam, according to his lawyers. He was denied
the right to practice his religion. Held in a 9-by-7-foot cell
with only a toilet, a sink, and a steel slab to sleep on, he was
subjected to noxious fumes, extreme temperatures, absolute
light or darkness for periods in excess of twenty-four hours.
He was denied showers for weeks at a time, then subjected to
forced grooming at the hands of interrogators. He
was subjected to painful, forced stress positions,
hooding, forced nakedness, threatened with torture
and murder, and given mind-altering chemicals against his will.
These abuses were described by the Justice Department memos as
The use of scenarios designed to convince the detainee that
death or severely painful consequences are imminent for him or
his family.
The brief says that Padilla was frequently heard weeping in
his cell, and exhibited signs of psychological distress including
involuntary twitching and self-inflicted scratch wounds.
When Padilla sought help for chest pain and breathing difficulties,
as well as for extreme, chronic pain brought on by stress positions,
he was denied.
Not surprisingly, Yoos lawyer, Eric George, told the
New York Times Padillas suit was a political
diatribe that belongs, at best, in a journal, not
before a federal court.
See Also:
Miami: Collapse of
Liberty City 7 case exposes fraud of war on terror
[15 December 2007]
A travesty of justice:
Jose Padilla found guilty
[17 August 2007]
Jurors begin deliberations
in Jose Padilla trial
[16 August 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |