|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Australia: Protestors denounce Labors Northern Territory
intervention
By WSWS reporters
25 June 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Demonstrations in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and other Australian
state capitals last Saturday demanded the Rudd Labor government
end the Northern Territory Emergency Response into Aboriginal
communities. The protests were held on the first anniversary of
the intervention which was introduced last year by
the Howard government and is now being extended by the federal
Labor government.
While the government and media insist that the purpose of the
intervention was to save Aboriginal children from
sexual abuse and other problems fueled by alcoholism, its real
purpose is to cut welfare, break up remote communities and townships,
and take control of Aboriginal land. It suspended the Racial Discrimination
Act, appointed so-called business managers with wide-ranging powers
over the Aboriginal communities and imposed income management
on Aboriginal people. Already, some 50 percent of welfare for
Aboriginal people in government prescribed areas is
now being issued in the form of plastic cards or vouchers that
can only be used in government-designated stores.
Protestors called on the Labor government to repeal all the
Northern Territory intervention laws and provide increased government
funding for health, education and other basic services that Aboriginal
communities desperately need.
About 400 people heard speakers in the inner-Sydney suburb
of Redfern and then marched to the Sydney Town Hall chanting Repeal
the racist legislation, human rights for all, Aboriginal
control over Aboriginal affairs and other slogans. The Melbourne
rally outside the State Library attracted about 150 while about
100 demonstrated in Brisbane with smaller numbers at protests
in Wollongong, Canberra, Hobart, Adelaide and Perth.
In Sydney Vince Forester from Mutitjulu, a township adjacent
to Uluru (Ayers Rock) in central Australia, said Aboriginal people
had been given citizenship in 1967 but were still waiting
for all their rights and entitlements.

Forester warned that Aboriginal people would resist government
moves to shut down the remote communities it considered unviable.
He said Labors agenda represented ethnic cleansing
and called for civil disobedience around Australia.
Forester warned that the Mutitjulu community would stop tourist
climbs on Uluru to protest the intervention.
Lyle Cooper told the Melbourne protest that the intervention
had taken dignity away from Aboriginal people and
that the intervention measures had impacted heavily on old people
and the chronically ill.
The main political theme, however, of the national rallies,
which were organised by the Aboriginal Rights Coalition with the
support of various middle class radical groupings, was that protest
action could force Labor to repeal the intervention legislation.
None of the speakers in Sydney or Melbourne pointed out that
the intervention was in fact part of a generalised assault on
the working class by the Rudd government. Instead, several, including
Robbie Thorpe who chaired the Melbourne meeting and Mitch, an
Arrernte and Luritja woman and anti-uranium activist from Alice
Springs, espoused the reactionary politics of black nationalism,
falsely claiming that the intervention was a result of white
society.
Significantly, Thorpe barely mentioned the intervention, spending
most of his time demagogically denouncing Australia as the worst
racist country in the world, comparing it with Nazi Germany
and South Africa under apartheid. Mitch told the Melbourne meeting
that the problem was whites control the land and make
the laws. This country has no right to be prosperous
and you ought to be ashamed, she said. In other words, there
was no difference between the ruling elite and the working class.
Everyone was to blame for the oppression of the Aboriginal peoplenot
successive Australian governmentsincluding Rudd Laborand
the corporate interests they represented. Above all, not the capitalist
profit system itselfwhich exploits all sections of the working
class, both black and white.
In Sydney two union officialsRita Mallia from the Construction
Forestry Mining Energy Union and Simon Finn from the Fire Brigade
Employees Unionand Warren Roberts, a member of Young Labor
made various appeals to the Rudd government.
Mallia said that Rudd should hold a genuine review
into the intervention and honour the promises contained
in his national apology to members of the Stolen Generations earlier
this year. In fact, Rudd carefully made very few concrete promises
in his sorry speech which was aimed, not at transforming conditions
of life for Aboriginal people but at securing political support
from a layer of Aboriginal entrepreneurs and bureaucrats, along
with sections of the small l liberal and so-called
left, while diverting attention from its expansion
of the NT intervention.
A statement read out by Greens senator Rachel Siewert to the
Sydney rally also called for Labor to admit it has made
a mistake with the intervention and return to its
core values.
But Labor is operating precisely on the basis of its core
values! These centre on fulfilling its commitments to big
business to create the best possible environment for boosting
productivity and amassing profits and private wealth. That is
why Labor was backed by the Murdoch press and key sections of
Australias corporate elite in the November federal election
and why it extended its unconditional bipartisan support for Howards
launch of the intervention last June.
Since winning office, Rudd has extended the intervention into
north Queensland and Western Australia and imposed income
management on more than 13,300 Aboriginal people.
In a press statement issued on Friday, Minister for Indigenous
Affairs Jenny Macklin declared that Labor was fully committed
to the intervention and that more than 20,000 Aboriginal people
would be placed on income management in the next few months. She
also told the media that Labor would slash all welfare to Aboriginal
families if they failed to regularly send their children to school.
The Labor government has also announced an intervention review
board. This body, the government claims, will make an evidence-based
assessment of its new measures. The review board, however, is
dominated by pro-intervention bureaucrats and right-wing Aboriginal
leaders. According to an intervention taskforce report released
last Friday, the provision of health, education, welfare and other
basic services will be determined on the basis of whether or not
each Aboriginal community is economically viable.
* * *
World Socialist Web Site reporters interviewed some
of those attending the Sydney and Perth demonstrations.
In Sydney Stephen Langford said: I came
here to protest against the intervention and the non-coverage
of the intervention in the media. Whats happening in the
Northern Territory might as well be happening in Mars. But if
you know nothing else, the suspension of the Racial Discrimination
Act should set the bells ringing.
Under the current intervention Ive heard that programs
like the CDEP [Community Development Employment Projects] and
womens refuges have been de-funded. You just get scraps
from the mainstream media but the bits and pieces Ive got
all point in the same direction, of it being exploitative and
photo opportunities for the soldiers involved.
When Howard initiated the intervention a year ago I didnt
swallow the official line. Anything that Howard did was criminal,
or verging on it. The fact that Rudd is continuing the policy
is disappointing but not a surprise, given that Rudd has not got
rid of the WorkChoices legislation. Rudds done
some feel-good stuff but hes not actually doing the job.
I dont think the intervention had anything to do
with rescuing children but about getting Aboriginal land, breaking
up communities. They have problems in the Northern Territory for
sure but actually engaging with people is surely the way to go,
not doing what has been done far too long to Aboriginal people.
Penepole Grace attended
the rally not primarily as a protester but as a member of Human
Rights Monitor, a Sydney group which attends demonstrations to
collect evidence of improper or illegal activity by the police.
She told the WSWS that she had nevertheless been concerned about
the intervention for several months. There were programs
initiated by Aboriginal communities that were going well and doing
a lot of good things. They were crying out for money but none
was forthcoming and yet theres all this money being splurged
on the NT intervention, she said. A lot of that money
could have been given to people who have been doing these programs
for years and have now been stopped in their tracks.
I feel very strongly that Aboriginal people were not
consulted. Okay, there were some bad situations but there are
bad situations in every community and I think the welfare quarantining
has been very hard on some people.
Howards actions in the Northern Territory are like
his actions in Iraq. Did they really talk to the Iraqis before
they invaded their country? And its the same with Aboriginal
peoplethey didnt talk to them but just barged in.
Emily Bullock told the WSWS that while the
intervention promised to improve conditions for Aboriginal people
it has made life more degrading for those living in the
Territory. It hasnt improved the lives of children and it
has taken power away from the local communities.
I think it was a land grab and there were other issues
which will eventually come out in history. It wasnt about
the welfare of Aboriginal people, it was about controlling them.

Im not surprised about Rudd continuing the intervention.
I heard former Labor leader Gough Whitlam speak on television
last night. Whitlam, too, promised to improve the lives of Aborigines
but he petered out, she said.
Annette, an Aboriginal student nurse, who
attended the Perth rally told the World Socialist Web Site:
The Howard government went about the intervention the wrong
way. He may have done this because he knew he was on his way out
but there was no discussion with elders or the medical services
in the communities.
I was attending a nurses conference in Alice Springs
last year and we were told by the medical services there about
the intervention. We were all shocked. There were over 100 nursing
students there at the conference we had tears in our eyes. We
could only imagine how terrified Aboriginal people must have been
when the police and the army came into the communities. Many of
them would have been afraid that the police and army would take
away their children even though they cant take our children
away because we stick up for ourselves now.
Rhianwen, a young mental health worker, said:
I dont agree with cutting benefits because its
not an issue of lack of budgeting skills. Most indigenous people
are struggling to survive on unrealistic levels of welfare.
Mental health issues arise because we live in a competitive
societythere is the stress of living and the use of methamphetamines
is increasing and many are still struggling at the bottom of society.
I want to see more accountability and empowerment of people with
mental health issues.
I would like to see public housing works as a priority
and Im against discrimination towards indigenous people.
We need better services for people with mental health problems
and disabilities because these people always get fobbed off at
the moment.
See Also:
Northern Territory intervention: an
on-the-spot report
Rudd Labor deepens Howards assault on Aboriginal communities
[21 June 2008]
NT intervention extended:
Australian Labor budget punishes society's most disadvantaged
[22 May 2008]
Australia: SBS television's
bogus debate on Northern Territory intervention
[2 April 2008]
An exchange on Australia's
"Sorry Day"
[22 February 2008]
Australian Prime Minister
apologises to "stolen generation": rhetoric versus reality
[13 February 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |