|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
After Rudds apology to indigenous people
Australian government extends welfare quarantining
and land grab
By Mike Head
4 March 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
When the Rudd government made a formal apology to the Aboriginal
stolen generations on February 13, the WSWS warned
that all those hailing the apology as a step toward rectifying
the historic crimes committed against the indigenous people were
carrying out a monstrous deception. We cited the old maxim that
when the ruling class apologises for past crimes, it is only in
order to better commit those of the present. (See: Australian
federal parliaments sorry resolution: the real
agenda)
On February 27, Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin delivered
a speech to the National Press Club that confirmed the necessity
for that warning. Macklin announced that the two central thrusts
of the former Howard governments police-military intervention
against Northern Territory (NT) indigenous townships and camps
will be expanded, with slight variations. She outlined plans to
extend the quarantining, or partial seizure, of welfare
payments from the NT to Western Australia, and introduce new means
for overturning communal land title to make way for private ownership.
Macklin said the welfare measures will give a government agency,
Centrelink, the power to impose income management to combat
poor parenting and community behaviours. Officials will
be able to freeze all or part of a persons unemployment,
sole parent, disabled or retirement benefit, for alleged neglect
of children or breach of social norms. As in the NT,
those affected will receive vouchers for food and other designated
items, to be spent at government-approved shops.
While the NT regime quarantines half the benefits
of all recipients in targeted communities (the number of which
has doubled to 25 since Labor took office last November), the
new measures will be triggered by state government child protection
officers, who will ask Centrelink to subject families to income
management. A similar pilot program is underway in four townships
on Cape York in Queensland, in collaboration with that states
Labor government and indigenous lawyer Noel Pearson.
These provisions not only wind the clock back to the days when
Aboriginal people were paid in rations and had their children
stolen from them for alleged neglect. They provide a blueprint
to be applied readily to all working class people. Significantly,
Labors program will apply, for the first time, to non-indigenous
people living in selected communities in Western Australia.
On the land question, Macklin said it was imperative to encourage
private home ownership and give potential investors incentive
to invest. The Howard governments measures, encouraging
townships to lease their land to private developers for 99 years,
will be made more flexible by allowing for shorter-term
leases, of 20 years or more. Similar schemes are being introduced
by the state Labor governments in Queensland, South Australia
and Western Australia. Macklin claimed the new leases were nothing
newmining companies already held scores of such leases over
Aboriginal land.
Cynically, in the name of overcoming despair and hopelessness
and the vast and worsening gulf between Aboriginal
and non-Aboriginal people, Macklin has unveiled schemes that will
further dispossess and impoverish indigenous people, pave the
way for corporate profit and establish trial schemes for ending
all welfare entitlements.
On both the welfare and land fronts, free market
forces will be unleashed. The welfare cutoffs are essentially
designed to coerce thousands of social security recipients into
cheap labour jobs, in order to help meet the demand of employers
for the removal of disincentives to employment. In
remote townships, quarantined residents will be also
under pressure to abandon the communities and clear potentially
valuable land for mining, grazing or tourism ventures. Likewise,
the land tenure changes seek to erode the obstacles of land
rights and native title rights established since
the 1970s, while pushing indigenous people into the private housing
market.
Just as the Howard government used a report on Aboriginal child
abuse in the NT to impose its welfare-cutting and land-grabbing
measures on the false pretext of protecting children,
the Rudd government has utilised a coroners report on indigenous
suicides in WAs northern Kimberley region to deepen the
offensive.
While claiming to be appalled by Coroner Alastair
Hopes report on 21 suicides that occurred in 2006, including
that of an 11-year-old boyan increase of 100 percent over
the previous yearMacklin declared that the problems could
not be solved by spending buckets of money on Aboriginal
people. Her line was little different to that of her predecessor
as indigenous affairs minister, the Howard governments Mal
Brough, who argued that welfare dependence and generous
government spending were at the root of the indigenous social
crisis.
In reality, billions of dollars are required to redress the
terrible ill-health, sub-standard housing, poor education and
substance abuse suffered in many indigenous communities. Less
than a year ago, an Oxfam Australia report documented Australias
health gapthe fact that the federal government
spent approximately 70 cents per person on the health of Aborigines
and Torres Strait Islanders for every $1 spent on the rest of
the population.
Last week, the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public
Health released a report into Aboriginal housing, which found
that only 6 percent of houses had adequate facilities to prepare
and cook meals, and just 11 percent passed a standard assessment
for electrical safety. In half the houses, it was not possible
to wash a child in a tub or bath, and a functioning shower was
available in only a third. Overcrowding was commonplace10
to 15 people, and sometimes more, were sharing houses. Notably,
the report demolished widespread claims that Aboriginal people
were to blame for wrecking houses. It found that the vast majority
of the problems were due to faulty construction or lack of maintenance,
and only 10 percent were due to damage.
While promising that $1.6 billion would be spent on indigenous
housing over four years, Macklin insisted that private investment
was the key to overcoming the housing crisis and made clear that
securing long-term tenure for investors would be a
major plank of the bipartisan Joint Policy Commission to be chaired
by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and opposition leader Brendan Nelson.
Macklin declared that indigenous people had to be given the
same opportunity of home ownership as other Australians:
Australians have always aspired to home ownership as a measure
of ensuring economic, physical and emotional security. If I have
equity in my home, I have a stake in my economic future.
This is under conditions where at least 300,000 home buyers across
Australia risk losing their houses this year because of severe
housing stress caused by rising interest rates. Housing
affordability has fallen to historic lowsservicing the median
home loan now requires almost 50 percent of after-tax gross median
family income.
In many respects, Macklins speech echoed an Australian
Financial Review editorial published two days earlier, entitled,
Apology is first step. It described Rudds rising
public opinion poll ratings since the national apology as in
part, a reward for leadership on the symbolic but warned
that his approval rating had to be used to pursue a definite program.
The editorial said the quarantining of welfare had to be retained,
disincentives to employment minimised and the long-term
viability of some remote townships questioned.
Labors partnership approach
The central problem that the corporate and political establishment
had in pursuing this agenda under the Howard government was the
widespread and deepening opposition, among indigenous and non-indigenous
people alike, to the NT intervention and the governments
entire program.
Last November, the Rudd government was swept into office on
the wave of a massive anti-Howard vote. In the remote NT communities,
such was the hostility to the NT intervention that Aboriginal
people voted overwhelming Labor. In some communities, such as
Wadeye, the vote was as high as 95 percent. Not only did the Coalition
lose government, but both Howard and Brough lost their parliamentary
seats.
That is why Labors approach differs from Howards
in one significant aspect. In her speech, without uttering a word
of criticism of the Howard government, Macklin spoke of new
ways of doing things. She called for partnerships
between government, indigenous leaders and business.
Her appeal underscores one of the central purposes of the February
13 national apology. It is to bring a layer of Aboriginal community
leaders, business operators and officials, who were largely sidelined
under the Howard government, back into the fold to help implement
a pro-capitalist program. The apology also sought to cultivate
support among the small-l liberal and radical lefts,
who were largely critical of Rudds bipartisan support for
Howards policies during the election campaign, in order
to assist in isolating and suppressing opposition to the Labor
governments program.
Among those welcoming Macklins speech was Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Tom Calma,
who told ABC radio he was very encouraged by the ministers
heavy emphasis on partnership. Calma agreed with Macklins
call for private home ownership, even though it was similar to
her predecessors, Brough, while praising Labors welfare
measures as more palatable and totally different
to what existed in the NT.
Also expressing his satisfaction was an outspoken proponent
of 99-year leases, former Labor Party national president Warren
Mundine. In the lead up to Macklins announcements, Mundine,
a member of the Howard governments now defunct National
Indigenous Council (NIC), insisted that such leases had to proceed,
to avoid stifling business. If we are looking to building
economies in these communities then we need to have a free flow
of people to create commercial activities, he said.
Throughout last year, the Labor Party extended full support
to the NT intervention, reflecting its agreement with the underlying
economic and social agenda. It is now in the process of adjusting
and refining the measures in order to meet the demands of the
corporate elite while drawing in new partners to obscure
the fundamental issues, confuse ordinary people and deliver the
required outcomes.
The reality is that at the core of the measures being implemented
are the very economic forces that were responsible for the destruction
of Aboriginal society over the past two centuriesgrounded
on the establishment of private ownership in land. The clearing
of the indigenous population from the land, through massacres,
poisonings, forced removals and the seizure of childrenwas
a product of the capitalist profit system itself, beginning with
the development of the pastoral industry.
Rectifying these crimes, and providing the resources and assistance
needed for decent health services, schools, housing, welfare and
essential facilities, is impossible without abolishing the economic
system that produced, and continues to perpetuate, these injustices.
A unified mass political movement of the working classAboriginal
and non-Aboriginal alikeis needed to reorganise society
completely along socialist and genuinely democratic lines, on
the basis of human need not private profit. That movement will
be built only in direct opposition to all those currently hailing
Labors apology and embracing Macklins announcements.
See Also:
Australia: "Lefts"
sign-up with Rudd Labor
[25 February 2008]
An exchange on Australia's
"Sorry Day"
[22 February 2008]
Australia: Press blacks out
Aboriginal protest over Northern Territory intervention
[15 February 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |