ON THE
WSWS
Donate
to
the WSWS!
News Feed
Contact
the
WSWS
Editorial
Board
New
Today
News
& Analysis
Workers
Struggles
Arts
Review
History
Science
Polemics
Philosophy
Correspondence
Archive
About
WSWS
About
the ICFI
Help
Books
Online
OTHER
LANGUAGES
German
French
Italian
Russian
Polish
Czech
Serbo-Croatian
Spanish
Portuguese
Turkish
Sinhala-
Tamil
Indonesian
LEAFLETS
Download
in
PDF format
|
|
WSWS : Arts
Review : Exhibitions
American painter Edward Hopper in Chicago
By J. Cooper
22 March 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Edward Hopper, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, May 6 through
August 19, 2007; National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., September
16, 2007 through January 21, 2008; Art Institute of Chicago, February
16 through May 11, 2008
What is it in the work of American painter Edward Hopper (1882-1967)
that continues to resonate with many viewers in the twenty-first
century? Perhaps Hoppers work conveys a psychological uneasiness
pervasive in modern class society. We recognize a social disconnect
that has only deepened in the 40-plus years since the artists
death.
The Art Institute of Chicago is currently hosting the final
installation of the retrospective show Edward Hopper, following
its stints at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston and the National
Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C.
The exhibition of more than 90 oil paintings, watercolors,
sketches and etchings is organized in loose chronological fashion.
The first rooms contain early sketches and etchings, then watercolors
from summers in the working-class fishing town of Gloucester,
Massachusetts, and rural Maine. The urban scenes, mostly of New
York City, are also grouped together.
The center of the exhibition displays The Iconsi.e.,
works from what many consider Hoppers most fertile years,
the 1930s and 1940s, during which he painted the famous Early
Sunday Morning (1930), Nighthawks (1942) and
New York Movie (1939). The final work in the exhibition,
Sun in an Empty Room (1963), is described in the curators
notes as Hoppers coming full circle, fulfilling
his self-proclaimed desire to paint light on the side of
a building.
Born in Nyack, New York, to a middle class family (his father
owned a dry goods store), Hopper studied at the New York School
of Art for seven years beginning in 1900. He eventually gained
a great deal from the classes he took with Robert Henri, one of
the major figures of American Realism (the so-called Ashcan
School) and, politically, an anarchist. Hopper made several
extended trips abroad toward the end of that decade and came under
the influence of French and European literature and culture, but
claimed to be unaware of and unaffected by Modernist art work
(Picasso and others). The painting that apparently impressed him
the most during his travels was Rembrandts The Night
Watch, which he viewed in Amsterdam.
Before he gained recognition as an artist who had something
significant to say, Hoppers paintings were largely ignored.
He worked as a commercial illustrator, also selling prints and
watercolors, unable to make his first sale of a painting to a
public institution until 1923. Not until he was more than 40 did
Hopper enjoy success. He sold every painting from his second solo
show, in 1924, around the time he first married.

The current exhibition in Chicago provides a retrospective
look that is both broad and deep. It allows us a window into the
artist, much as the artist peered through windows into the soul
of the US in the last century.
The window, viewed sometimes from without, sometimes from within,
is a recurring theme in Hoppers paintings. It is this hint
of voyeurism linked to an acute sense of aloneness (not quite
loneliness) that so captures twentieth century America. Whether
he painted a New England house or a glimpse into a New York apartment,
Hoppers work expresses a profound, if perhaps unconscious,
affinity with the modern psyche in the century of two world wars
and the Great Depression.
We are moved by the emptiness, the estrangement between people
and places as much today as viewers in the early to middle part
of the last century. Hoppers work conveys not just anxiety
or alienation as represented by the subject matter, but a thoughtfulness
and even optimism created by his astute and sensitive interpretation
of light as it plays on the surfaces, objects and people that
inhabit his canvases.
Considered a Realist in that his subject matter is drawn from
life and not abstract, Hopper avoided sentimentality to the point
of verging on detachment. He painted mundane places and ordinary
people doing ordinary things, and powerfully revealed an essential
disquiet in that existence. His artistic choice of subject matter
was, at the time, considered quite daring. While he was influenced
by Daumier, Courbet, Degas, Eakins and other artists of an earlier
period, Hopper turned his attention to buildings, railroad tracks,
restaurants, rooftops and, increasingly, to individuals seen as
though from a passing elevated train, or observed from a distance
while engaged in a private moment.
Denied early recognition (and therefore income) as a painter,
Hopper produced more than 50 etchings between 1915 and 1923. Many
of these are included in the exhibition, and they are quite startling.
Night on the El Train (1920) depicts a couple in conversation,
the womans back to the viewer, the mans face tilted
downward towards his companion, both tucked into the left side
of the picture. The light is falling primarily on a row of empty
seats in the foreground, touching the womans back and the
mans face only slightly. The darkened windows reveal nothing
of the world speeding past.
Night Shadows(1921) treats a lone pedestrian, observed
from the height of a modern skyscraper, approaching the ominous
shadow of a street lamp cast across the deserted street and corner
shop. Similarly, Night in the Park (1921) seems to
suggest that the artist has stumbled on a solitary man reading
a newspaper under harsh lamplight in a lonely park. There is a
darkness of mood in these visions of anonymous people, deserted
landscapes and depopulated buildings, created with chiaroscuro
reminiscent of Rembrandts etchings.
The growth of big cities and Americas emergence as a
massive industrial and commercial power, with all its implications,
inevitably form part of the intellectual background to such works.
Hopper belonged to the generation of artists and writers that
in the 1920s shook off a great deal of American provincialism
and parochialism.
The mystery, the removed point of view and the concern with
everyday life remained Hoppers signature throughout his
long career.
However, his preferred medium was oil when working in his studio
and watercolor for his outdoor work. The first painting he ever
sold to a museum, The Mansard Roof (1923), is an impressionist-inspired,
fresh water color of sunlight playing on a Victorian house, the
canopies brushed by the breeze, the movement of the foreground
trees indicated with delicate wash.
During his summers in Massachusetts and Maine, Hopper produced
striking drawings and watercolor studies as well as oil paintings
of lighthouses, homes and industrial buildings, developing an
increasing interest in the solid architectural shapes created
by the changing light on the structures. As his style matured,
his technique became less free, more deliberate and
architectonic.

Many of the works included in this exhibition are remarkable.
Some are less successful. Hoppers attempts at painting boats
at sea seem stiff, despite the concerted attempt to portray the
motion of a vessel in the water. His early years as an illustrator
occasionally insert themselves when a less predictable style would
be more effective. The exhibition as a whole, however, allows
the viewer to appreciate the development of the artist during
the most convulsive years of the twentieth century.
Critics have noted the influence of film noir (American
filmmaking characterized by dark, tense representations of life)
or similar cinematic sensibilities on Hoppers work. (How
many of his works have Night in their title?) Hopper
came of age at the time of the emergence of the moving picture,
as well as the acceptance and use of 35mm still photography by
figures such as Edward Steichen, Alfred Stieglitz and others who
turned snapshots into art. Many of Hoppers works give the
impression that the artist is recalling fragments of life as though
captured on a frame of film. The artist never tells us the whole
story. So much is left to the viewers imagination that an
entire film could, in turn, be created from looking at a Hopper
painting.

We feel the emptiness created by the massive dark window
in Nighthawks, framing characters that are together,
yet uncommunicative. Observed in the wee hours, the painter looks
in through a large plate-glass window to a spare diner, past its
lonely patrons, to the silent streets behind. Room in New
York (1932) peers in at a couple in their living room through
the open window of a city apartment. The pair are separated by
space both physical and psychological, each preoccupied. Hopper
conveys a palpable disquiet by the angle of the womans starkly
lit shoulder as she turns away from her companion to plunk a solitary
note on a piano.
Night Windows (1928), which at the time caused
controversy, shows the rounded corner of a city apartment as if
seen from a passing elevated train. A warmly lit interior is seen
through three windows. A rounded woman in a translucent red slip,
her back to the observer and half-obscured by the central window,
is captured slightly bent over as if putting something on an unseen
chair. One could, without too much prompting, work out an entire
scenario from this single moment. The painting seems intended
to encourage such an effort.

Hoppers later work, represented in the exhibition by
Western Motel (1957), Sea Watchers (1952)
and Sun in an Empty Room, became less sensuous, more
geometric and deliberately surreal. One of the most distinctive
pieces from this period, Rooms by the Sea (1951),
is unfortunately not included in this show.
These post-World War II scenes of the American 1950s and 1960s
capture the increasingly stagnant and banal social climate of
that period. The figures have become stiffer, more angular. And
typical of Hopper, the influence of monumental events is inferred,
never referred to directly. The elements of social disengagement
that Hopper was sensitive to in the post-World War I era, given
impetus by the impact of urban life, modern industry and the political
disappointments of the mid-century, have evolved into cold indifference
by the 1950s.

Hopper was a highly self-conscious artist. He felt that the
best artists (and he of course included himself in that category)
reveal an inner life in the artist, and this inner life
will result in his personal vision of the world. No amount of
skillful invention can replace the essential element of imagination.
One of the weaknesses of much abstract painting is the attempt
to substitute the inventions of the intellect for a pristine imaginative
conception. His source material was always the facts,
as he told Lloyd Goodrich, former director of the Whitney Museum
of American Art, but the final product was from his own imagination.
Viewing this expansive collection allows Hoppers imagination
to engage ours as well.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |