|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: France
Paris meeting commemorates the life and work of Keerthi Balasuriya
By our correspondent
25 March 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The International Committee of the Fourth International held
a meeting in Paris on March 16 to commemorate the twentieth anniversary
of the death, aged 39, of Sri Lankan Trotskyist leader Keerthi
Balasuriya.
The meeting was addressed by Chris Marsden of the British Socialist
Equality Party, Amuthan, the chief editor of the Tamil page of
the World Socialist Web Site, and Peter Schwarz, secretary
of the ICFI and a leader of the German SEP.
Chairing the meeting, Athiyan, a leading member of the ICFI
in Frances Tamil community, said that Keerthis struggle
is a source of inspiration to the younger generation throughout
the world and took as an example of this the young Tamil Trotskyist
leader, Raveenthiranathan Senthil Ravee, who died tragically a
year ago in a motoring accident at the age of 37.
Marsden detailed the role of the Trotskyists of the Bolshevik
Leninist Party of India, who, basing themselves on the theory
of the permanent revolution developed by Trotsky, had led the
fight in the 1940s for the emancipation of Sri Lanka, then called
Ceylon, from British colonialism. Its Ceylonese unit, the Lanka
Sama Samaja Party (LSSP), fought for this struggle to be led by
the working class across ethnic and religious divisions, with
a perspective of overthrowing all forms of oppression and the
construction of socialism. Their struggle against the racist constitution
imposed by British imperialism, which denied the Tamil minority
of citizenship and official recognition of their language, put
them at the head of mass struggles, notably the hartal (general
strike) in 1953.

Tragically, said Marsden, this was to prove
to be the high point of the LSSPs principled political struggle.
The party successively adapted itself to the parliamentary framework,
to nationalism and to communalism, a process bound up with the
growth of centrist and revisionist tendencies inside the Fourth
International, led by Michel Pablo and Ernest Mandel.
Marsden recounted the series of betrayals of the LSSP leadership
which are responsible for the division of the Tamil workers and
peasants from the majority Sinhala population and the descent
into the 25 years of continuing civil war that began with the
1983 pogroms.
It is only in light of this development that one can
truly appreciate the significance of Keerthi Balasuriya and others
who remained true to Trotskyism, Marsden said. Their
forces were small, but the stand they took was of inestimable
and world historic importance.... Without their political stand
then, the reputation of socialism and of Trotskyism would have
forever afterwards laboured under the weight of the LSSPs
political treachery.
On every front, Keerthi sought to defend the political
independence and historic interests of the working class,
Marsden explained. When the political crisis within the
then British section of the ICFI, the Workers Revolutionary Party,
came to a head in 1985, he played a central role in the struggle
waged by the International Committee to restore and renew the
perspective of Trotskyism.
Before he died tragically of a heart attack in December 1987,
Keerthi was involved in intensive programmatic work seeking to
understand the political implications of the unprecedented development
of globalised production for the prospects for social revolution
and, on this basis, to draw a balance sheet of the historic
experience of the working class with bourgeois nationalist movements
and the nominally independent states created under the auspices
of the national bourgeoisie.
Through these discussions, the ICFI came to the conclusion
that the separatist and communalist movements of the present period
represent a response by the regional and ethnically based bourgeoisie
seeking to liberate themselves from existing centralised states
only in order to secure their own right to exploit the working
class and essential natural resources and in this way make their
relations with the major powers and transnational corporations.
Such movements have no genuinely democratic or anti-imperialist
content. They are antithetical to the struggle of the working
class to unify itself internationally and to end the division
of the world into antagonistic capitalist nation states, which
is the only genuine basis for ending imperialist oppression.
In this way, Marsden concluded, Keerthis life and work
is now part of the warp and woof of the revolutionary socialist
canonthe essential historically derived program and perspective
for the liberation of humanity from class oppression.
Amuthan spoke of the time when, as a refugee from the anti-Tamil
pogroms and strongly influenced by concepts of national liberation,
but disillusioned in the bourgeois nationalist parties he had
fought with, he had first met Keerthi at an ICFI international
school in Germany. I was new to the party. On the very first
day Keerthi came to me during the lunch break.... Our discussion
was centred on the political situation in Sri Lanka and India
and the character of the national groups. Both countries agreed
to sign the Indo-Sri Lankan Accord in 1987, which had a vast political
impact on the Indian subcontinent. The reactionary character of
the national bourgeois in the underdeveloped countries once more
came into the light.
Amuthan recalled that at the time the ICFI was not well known
among Tamils. Now 20 years later we have established a solid
political authority for an international socialist perspective
among the Tamil community in Europe.
All the Tamil nationalist groups, some claiming to be socialist,
had agreed to the signing of the Indo-Sri Lanka Accord: This
resulted in enormous political confusion among the Tamil population
in Europe. Sections of youth who opposed this pact left these
movements. However, an alternative political perspective was absent.
Keerthi explained the class character of these movements
and their relationship to the working class, Amuthan said.
He pointed out that their capitulation to the Indian government
was a logical consequence of their capitalist perspective. They
relied more on the assistance of the Indian bourgeoisie than the
Tamil masses. Their perspective is limited to achieving the exclusive
right to exploit the workers and masses. This is the opposite
of a genuine struggle for democratic rights.
He insisted that the fulfilment of democratic rights
could only be realised through a socialist revolution and explained
the perspectives of the Sri Lankan section of the ICFI.
Amuthan told the meeting that Keerthi, one month before he
died, had worked closely with his international co-thinkers
on the statement of the International Committee on the Indo-Sri
Lankan Accord. The Tamil version of the Situation
in Sri Lanka and the Political Tasks of the RCL (Revolutionary
Communist League, predecessor of the present Sri Lankan section
of the ICFI, the Socialist Equality Party) was one of the most
discussed documents among the politically conscious youth in the
late 1980s. In Europe, the sections of the International Committee
won a significant number of Tamil members and supporters.
The nature of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, the bourgeois
nationalist group leading the armed struggle for a separate state
in the Tamil north of the island, had been clearly revealed: The
transformation of the LTTE from claiming to be the freedom
fighters to a privileged elite became more transparent with
the signing of the cease-fire agreement in 2002. Business expansions
and investment plans became the political agenda of its representatives
and middlemen, causing the exile community to withdraw their support.
Amuthan said that Tamil nationalism was rapidly losing ground
among the Tamils in the Western countries. The war in Iraq,
unemployment, social inequality and the struggle of the students
and workers in the countries they live in have had an impact on
their political thinking. They no longer consider that the solution
to the democratic aspirations of the Tamil masses can be realised
through the narrow conception of forming a tiny capitalist state
in Tamil areas.
Peter Schwarz told the meeting, Keerthi conducted his
political work in an epoch in which the combined betrayals of
Social Democracy, Stalinism and Pabloism weighed heavily on the
working class and the Trotskyist cadre of the International Committee
remained relatively isolated.
But he was convinced that the inherent contradictions
of world capitalism would evoke a new period of revolutionary
mass struggles, and that the fate of theses struggles would entirely
depend on the existence of a revolutionary leadership, trained
and steeled in the lessons of the struggle against Pabloism.
The two years between the split with the WRP and Keerthis
premature death on December 18, 1987 were undoubtedly the most
fruitful of his political life. He made a substantial contribution
to the hundreds of pages of documents produced by the International
Committee during and after the split.... They laid the foundations
for the vast theoretical, political and organisational achievements
made by the International Committee over the last two decades
in particular for the development of the World Socialist Web
Site as the authentic voice of international Marxism.
The insoluble crisis of the world financial system sparked
off by the subprime credit crunch, the debacle of US imperialism
in Iraq and the battle for global hegemony between the great powers
will inevitably lead to new wars and a revival of ferocious
class struggles, Schwarz explained. Comrade Keerthi
spent his entire life preparing the working class for these inevitable
battles to come.
He reminded the meeting that we will soon be celebrating the
40th anniversary of the May-June 1968 uprising in France, the
biggest revolutionary movement in the advanced capitalist countries
in the postwar period.... Here in France, more than 10 million
workers went on a general strike that could only be brought under
control by the betrayal of the Stalinist Communist Party.
This was part of a massive movement which swept the world in
the early 1970s. The bourgeoisies counteroffensive involved
the abandonment of the Keynesian economic policies, which
constituted the basis of the social compromise of the postwar
period. It lifted national regulations on trade and finance and
opened the floodgates for a process known as globalisation. This
was accompanied by a massive attack on the working class, epitomised
by the smashing of the PATCO air traffic controllers union by
US President Ronald Reagan and the defeat of the British miners
strike by British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.
The response of the old reformist labour organisations was
to abandon their previous attempts to organise social compromise
within the framework of the nation state and to instead impose
massive attacks on the working class in order to keep their
national bourgeoisie competitive on the global market.
As for the Stalinist regimes of Eastern Europe, the Soviet
Union and China, Globalisation exposed the fraudulent nature
of their claim that socialism can be built in a single country,
in the framework of a single nation state.
Globalisation and the end of the Cold War have also exposed
the complete bankruptcy of the petty-bourgeois nationalist organisations,
Schwarz continued. Deprived of the possibility of manoeuvring
between Moscow and Washington, they have given up their
anti-imperialist pretensions and are vying for the support of
Washington or another imperialist power.... They are all looking
for a deal with imperialism that allows them to be junior partners
in the exploitation of their own working class.
A Tamil statelet in the north of Sri Lanka would be a
pliant tool for the intrigues of imperialism in the region. No
democracy is possible on such a basis.
Schwarz warned the meeting that the aggressive foreign policy
of the US and the growing conflicts and militarization of the
rival great powers were creating a situation resembling the lead-up
to the First World War. The question is now: Will imperialism
plunge mankind into a new, nuclear and possibly fatal world waror
will the international working class prevent this by overthrowing
capitalism and building society on a higher, socialist foundation?
He drew attention to the resurgence of the class struggle all
over Europe and asked: But who will provide the working
class with a perspective? The Social Democratic, Socialist and
Communist parties, who have constantly been moving to the right
over the last 40 years? The trade unions, who have betrayed struggle
after struggle and who are acting as a police force of the management
amongst workers? Or those who glorified Mao Zedong, Yasser Arafat
and the Sandinistas yesterday and are glorifying Hugo Chavez and
Evo Morales today? Does anyone seriously think that a military
officer like Chavez, who is giving out some hand-outs to the masses
from Venezuelas huge oil income, can provide a solution
to the problems facing the international working class?
Only the International Committee of the Fourth International
has a perspective, which is firmly based on an analysis of the
world situation and the historical experiences of the 20th century,
Schwarz said. We fight for the independent mobilisation
of the working class under the banner of socialist internationalism.
Honouring the legacy of Keerthi means educating the younger
generation in the history and the lessons drawn from the strategic
experiences of the working class ... lessons and principles embodied
in the ICFI.
See Also:
On the 20th anniversary of his death
SEP general secretary pays tribute to Keerthi Balasuriya
[15 March 2008]
Twenty years since
the death of Keerthi Balasuriya
[18 December 2007]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |