|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: France
France: Government, unions prepare large-scale pension cut
By Kumaran Ira and Alex Lantier
5 May 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
On April 28, French Labor Minister Xavier Bertrand met with
trade unions and employers organizations to set out guidelines
for another round of pension cuts. The centerpiece of the plan
is pushing the required pay-in period for all workers, both in
the public and private sectors, to 41 years from the current 40
years by 2012. This confirms the orientation set by President
Nicolas Sarkozy in his April 24 TV interview, in which he said
the only solution was to work and pay in longer.
The main lines of the current pension reform are mandated by
the 2003 pension cuts carried out under then-Prime Minister Jean-Pierre
Raffarin, including an increase in 2008 of the mandatory pay-in
period if there were no major change in demographic trends. As
a result, it is expected that the reforms laid out by the social
partnersthe unions and employers organizationsand
the state will be passed by simple executive decree, requiring
no new law in parliament. After the April 28 meeting, Bertrand
published an initial draft of reforms, titled 2008 Rendez-vous
on pensions.
The draft states that the pay-in period increase is justified
due to the increase in life expectancy noted by the INSEE [National
Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies]. The pension plans
worsening financial situation reinforces its necessity.
The draft also announces several minor, largely cosmetic measures
to help poorer retirees. One required pensions to pay 60 percent
of the pension amount to the spouse of a deceased retiree by 2011,
up from 56 percent. Another required the pension system to pay
a worker who has worked on full-time minimum wage (SMIC) for the
entire required pay-in period at least 85 percent of the SMICa
measure affecting relatively few minimum wage workers, who often
have long periods of irregular or part-time employment.
Of particular importance in this reform are the employment
conditions for workers over age 57, who are often forced to take
early retirements so companies can hire younger, cheaper workers
and minimize their pension payments. One sign of this is the employment
rate for people over 5538.1 percent in France, as opposed
to a European Union average of 43.6 percent. Until now, these
workers have been granted a Dispensation from Job Seeking (Dispensation
de Recherche dEmploiDRE). Upon being dismissed, they
were allowed to go on unemployment insurance until they reached
the legal retirement age and then still collected normal pensions.
The draft announces plans for unspecified increases in the
minimum age at which a DRE can be granted. With French pension
plans imposing harsh financial penalties on workers who fail to
meet the required pay-in period5 percent of the pension
amount per missing quarter of yearsuch plans would drastically
cut pensions for millions of workers.
Throughout this collaboration between the trade unions and
the French ruling elite, the sums at stake have remained somewhat
hidden from public view. What is being prepared, however, is a
massive transfer of funds from working class retirees to the coffers
of the state and, ultimately, the bottom lines of French corporations.
According to the INSEE, France has approximately 13.5 million
retirees, or 20 percent of the population. Each year roughly 500,000
workers retire, a figure expected to increase to 700,000 as the
baby boom generation retires. In 2006 expenditure on pensions
was roughly 235 billion, of which over 230 billion
came from employee and employer contributions, with the remaining
4.2 billion paid by the state.
In statistical documents prepared in November 2007, the states
Orientation Council on Pensions (COR) forecasted that, despite
substantial increases in the retiree population, the portion of
GDP spent on pensions would be held constant at 13 percent in
the future. Accepting this assumption, pension financing would
be in deficit by 15.1 billion in 2015, 47.1 billion
in 2030, and 68.8 billion by 2050. Underlying this assumption,
however, is the determination of the French bourgeoisie to spend
as little as it proves politically feasible to spend on pensions.
In its attempt to minimize pension payments, the French bourgeoisie
has hit on the idea of lengthening the required pay-in period,
to increase financial penalties on workers as the lengths of their
careers fall ever further behind the required pay-in period. The
first such reform, by Prime Minister Edouard Balladur in 1993,
made private sector workers pass from a 37.5-year to a 40-year
pay-in period. The second, by Raffarin in 2003, forced workers
in the general public sector pension fund to pass from a pay-in
period of 37.5 to 40 years, with a planned passage from 40 to
41 years in 2008. Last December, the government aligned public
sector workers with special regime pensionsthose
working in strategic sectors of the economy such as transport
and energyon the general fund.
As a result of these reforms, according to a study by the Organisation
of Economic Cooperation and Development (OCDE), the percentage
of retiring workers final wage that they receive as a pension
has passed from 64.7 percent to 51.2 percent.
The French working class has met these cuts with vigorous attempts
to defend its living standards. In 1995, public sector workers
largely shut down the country with a month-long strike against
Prime Minister Alain Juppés attempt to extend Balladurs
cuts to them. Teachers led a million-strong strike of public sector
workers against the 2003 cuts, and the transport and energy workers
mounted strikes in October and November of last year against the
special regime pensions reform. However, the French ruling class
has worked successfully to split up the working class, and dealt
with each section in turn.
The central obstacle to a successful defense of pension rights
has been the trade union leadership. Far from seeking to alert
workers to the long-term danger they faced and thus to wage a
political struggle in complete opposition to the bourgeoisie and
its representatives, the trade union bureaucracies have consistently
fought to prevent strikes from spreading, bring them to a close,
and then negotiate concessions deals with the state.
The collaboration between trade unions and the state is now
publicly discussed in the corporate media. As Sarkozy wrote in
an April 18 editorial in Le Monde, Right after the
presidential elections [of May 2007], even before going to the
Elysée [presidential palace], I met with trade unions and
business groups to listen to them and ask for their positions
on the first actions I was planning on taking. Since then, I have
continued to very regularly meet with each of their representatives....
The reform of the special regime pensions [was] successfully carried
out last fall, thanks to an intense period of coordination at
a national level, and negotiations in each enterprise affected
by the reform.
Jean-Christophe Le Duigou, a top official at the Stalinist-dominated
CGT (General Confederation of Labor, Frances largest union),
replied with an interview in the Financial Times praising
Sarkozy: He understands that we must give a place to social
dialogue. We are at a turning point in the social situation of
our country. Everyone believes that things must change.
Under such conditions, all class-conscious workers must be
aware of the trap being set for them by the CGT and CFDT (French
Democratic Confederation of Labor), as the unions announce plans
for a demonstration on May 22 against pension cuts. In conditions
where Sarkozys popularity is plummeting and economic difficulties
are mounting, such a call may meet a significant response. However,
the goal of the trade union bureaucracy will be to let off political
steam and to provide an illusion of struggle against the governmentwhile
plotting with Sarkozy behind the backs of the workers.
Shortly after the CFDT announced its support for the demonstrations,
its pension negotiator Gaby Bonnard admitted, we are not
hostile in principle to a lengthening of the pay-in period.
In a May 1 editorial, the conservative daily Le Figaro
praised the unions decision not to join its demonstration
with the May 15 high school students protest marches. It
wrote of the May 22 marches, We hope they are, from the
unions point of view, an honorable last stand against a
reform that is difficult, but essential for our country.
It added, The real subject for the trade unions is in fact
elsewhere. They must prolong the extraordinary renewal of social
manners in France of which they are the motive force.... Contributing
to such an essential reform as that of the pensions, already carried
out everywhere else, would send a signal that they have definitely
assumed their responsibilities.
To that, the working class need only add, their responsibilities
to the bourgeoisie. In fact, what Sarkozy and the bourgeois
media are artlessly revealing is the utter prostration of the
union bureaucrats, and by extension of all their hangers-on in
the leaderships of the left and pseudo-Trotskyist far left
parties.
Workers can dismiss the hypocritical assertion that there is
no money for pensions. The state protests against spending 4.2
billion on pensions, one year after Sarkozy gave a 10 percent
tax cut to the top income tax bracket costing 15 billion
per year. The projected pension deficit of 69 billionover
40 years from nowis smaller than last years profit
for the CAC-40 index of the 40 largest French enterprises, which
stood at 100 billion.
Above all, a political party must be formed to coordinate the
struggle against the governments program of social cuts
and its co-conspirators in the trade union leadership. The World
Socialist Web Site puts forward an international socialist
perspective to advance this fight among French workers and students.
See Also:
New French labour law attacks workers'
rights
[2 May 2008]
France: CGT union betrays port workers'
strike
[1 May 2008]
Sarkozy television interview
seeks to reassure French corporate elite
[28 April 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |