|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Australia
& South Pacific
Australian photographer Bill Hensonscapegoat for a wider
assault on democratic rights
By Richard Phillips
30 May 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
Australian police, encouraged by ongoing denunciations of artist/photographer
Bill Henson by Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, New South Wales (NSW)
Premier Morris Iemma and a small group of right-wing commentators,
have ramped up their witch-hunt of the internationally-acclaimed
artist following the seizure of 20 of his photographs from a Sydney
art gallery last week.
NSW police are currently threatening Henson and the Roslyn
Oxley9 Gallery owners with prosecution under a recently introduced
section of the NSW Crimes Act, which covers the production, dissemination
and possession of child pornography. If found guilty, the artist
could be jailed for a maximum of 10 years and the gallery owners
for five years. The accusation of child pornography against Henson,
who is represented in major galleries around the world, is ludicrous.
Henson has more than 250 photographs in state-funded Australian
galleries. However, since Prime Minister Rudds declaration
on national television that the artist/photographers work
was absolutely revolting, the police have begun visiting
local venues to intimidate curators and dictate what they can
or cannot display.
NSW police officers told the Albury Regional Gallery that unless
it took down several Henson photographs and removed images from
its web site, it could be prosecuted. Three days later police
raided Newcastle Regional Art Gallery and advised
management to take down some Henson photographsone of which
was in a staff room and not even on public display.
Police have also visited Melbournes National Gallery
of Victoria and the National Gallery of Australia in Canberra.
Although no photos were removed from these prestigious galleries,
the purpose of the visit was clear. National Gallery of Australia
director Ron Radford was questioned by police over the gallerys
collection of 79 Henson photographs, despite the fact that the
pictures were all in storage.
If we determine there are offences disclosed, then we
will go through the process of seizing whatever needs to be seized
in order to prove the offence, a police spokesperson told
the media. If youre in possession of child pornography,
whether you have it on your computer and whether you view it or
not, thats an offence.
Online media outlets reporting the witch-hunt and using digital
versions of Hensons photographs could also be prosecuted
after they were referred this week to the federal censorship authorities
by the Australian Communications and Media Authority, which investigates
complaints about internet content. In this coercive atmosphere,
the publishers of Art World, a new art magazine, were forced
to pulp 25,000 copies of its June-July issue. The magazine featured
a cover story on Henson and contained photos of the naked girl
that prompted the police raid of the Roslyn Oxley9 Gallery. The
survival of the bimonthly magazine, which only began publishing
three months ago, has been jeopardised by the additional $100,000
required to reprint the edition.
Artists challenge Rudd
Not a single elected Labor politicianstate or federalhas
opposed this escalating assault. On the contrary, appeals by leading
members of the artistic communitymany of whom had been recent
supporters of Ruddhave been arrogantly rejected by the Labor
government and attacked by radio shock-jocks and a collection
of thuggish media commentators.
On May 27, for example, actor Cate Blanchett and 42 other leading
writers, dramatists, filmmakers, musicians and artists issued
an open letter to the prime minister. The letter rejected allegations
that Hensons work was child pornography and called on Rudd
and Premier Iemma to rethink their previous comments.
The courts, the letter declared, were not the proper
place to debate the merit of Hensons work. If those
demanding charges against the artist were not pushed back there
would be further attacks, which would, in turn, encourage
a repressive climate of hysterical condemnation, backed by the
threat of prosecution.
We are already seeing troubling signs in the pre-emptive
self-censorship of some galleries, it continued. This
is not the hallmark of an open democracy nor of a decent or civilised
society. We should remember that an important index of social
freedom, in earlier times or in repressive regimes elsewhere in
the world, is how artists and art are treated by the state.
The letter called on the Minister for Arts and former Midnight
Oil rock singer Peter Garrett to stand up for artists
against the encroaching censorship, which has resulted in
the closure of this and other exhibitions.
Rudd arrogantly dismissed the appeal a day after it was published
and told the media that his opinion about Hensons photographs
was unchanged. The issue, he continued, would be decided
through the legal processes of the land.
Not surprisingly, arts minister Garrett simply ignored the
open letter. On the same day, NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione,
echoing Rudd, told a Sydney radio station that Hensons photographs
were offensive and objectionable and fully
endorsed their seizure by his officers. And on May 29, Rupert
Murdochs Australian newspaper published a letter
from so-called child protection activist Hetty Johnson, declaring
that she was committed to bringing Henson and the
gallery owners to trial.
Extreme right demands more attacks
Right-wing commentators are now celebrating Rudds denunciations
of Henson and fulminating against anyone who comes forward to
defend freedom of artistic expression. Those challenging the censorship
are accused of supporting or providing sustenance to pedophiles.
This was spelled out in an op-ed piece in the Sydney Morning
Herald, by columnist Paul Sheehan on May 26. Under the headline,
Artists crying out for martyrdom, he declared that
Australias artistic community was the equivalent of a claustrophobic,
reactionary one-party state, which was providing sustenance
to pederasts and child sexploiters.
Sheehan suggested, however, that the issue was broader and
that the real problem was Australias privacy laws,
artistic licence, freedom of expression, and Aboriginal rights,
which, he said, were helping to mask, exacerbate or even
rationalize, child sex abuse. He concluded with a threat:
while the Bill Henson exhibition may be the wrong time and
wrong place for this particular battle ... it is the right time
and right place to reinvigorate this particular war.
In other words, the war on fundamental democratic rights should
not be confined to Henson.
Sheehans rhetoric is chillingly reminiscent of the language
and anti-democratic measures that led to the Nazi book burnings
and the Nazis characterisation of virtually all modernist
art as Entartete Kunst or Degenerate Art. The fact that
it is published unchallenged in what passes as Sydneys small
l-liberal daily, and encouraged by the Rudd governments
endorsement of the current witch-hunt, should be taken a serious
warning to artists, intellectuals and all working people.
Rudd and the rest of the Labor leadership have seized on the
Henson issue as a diversion from mounting social tensions resulting
from the rapid rise in the cost of living and growing hostilityjust
six months after its electionto the Labor government. Like
the Howard government before it, Rudd Labor is trying to develop
a political constituency among the extreme right, Christian fundamentalists
and other disoriented layers to use as a means of intimidating
and suppressing critical thought, as it ramps up its assault on
the social conditions of the working class.
See Also:
Australia: Labor government backs witch-hunting
of photographer Bill Henson
[26 May 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |