|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Malaysia
Malaysias ruling coalition rattled after election debacle
By John Roberts
13 May 2008
Use
this version to print
| Send this
link by email | Email
the author
The new Malaysian parliament was sworn on April 28 after national
elections on March 8, which delivered a major blow to the ruling
Barisan National (BN) coalition. Unruly scenes during the countrys
first ever televised parliamentary session highlight the sharp
underlying political tensions that have surfaced as cracks have
begun to appear in the regime that has ruled the country since
independence in 1957.
De facto opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim upped the pressure
on Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi when he predicted to journalists
on April 14 that the government would not last the year. Such
was the dissatisfaction in BN ranks, he said, that the opposition
would be able to form a government with the support of defectors,
particularly from the states of Sabah and Sarawak in Borneo.
Anwar was speaking at the conclusion of a 10,000-strong rally
in Kuala Lumpur called to mark the end of a formal legal ban on
his involvement in politics. Anwar was finance minister and deputy
prime minister until 1998 when he was removed from his posts and
expelled in the midst of the Asian financial crisis and sharp
differences over economic policy. When he began to campaign against
the government, Anwar was arrested and tried on trumped-up charges
of corruption and sexual misconduct that resulted in the political
ban.
Anwars wife is head of the Peoples Justice Party (Keadilan)
and formally leader of the parliamentary opposition. However,
it is widely believed that an opposition MP will step down to
pave the way for Anwar to enter parliament via a by-election.
In a clear signal of his intention to do so, Anwar attended the
opening session as his wifes guest.
The opposition parties, including Keadilan, the Democratic
Action Party (DAP) and the Islamist Parti Islam se-Malaysia (PAS),
now hold 82 seats in the enlarged 222-seat lower houseup
from just 19 in the previous parliament. Abdullahs own United
Malays National Organisation (UMNO) and other BN partners slumped
from 198 to 140 seats and lost the two-thirds majority needed
to amend the constitution.
The government has denied that it is vulnerable to defections,
but there are a number of signs that UMNOs autocratic grip
on power is slipping. As well as winning a significant number
of federal parliamentary seats, the opposition gained control
of four state governmentsPenang, Selangor, Perak and Kedahand
retained power in Kelantan. Penang, Selangor and Perak; all are
the countrys most industrialised states and Kedah is the
main rice producer. Together the five states account for about
56 percent of the countrys GDP.
In the past, the government has not hesitated to punish opposition-controlled
states by withholding federal funds and contracts. To do so now,
however, would seriously undermine the economy and the governments
own economic plans. The loss of these states threatens to undercut
the system of patronage that has formed a crucial prop for UMNO
rule. The opposition Pakatan Rakyat or Peoples Front (PF) has
promised openness and transparency in the granting of commercial
contracts in the states that it controls.
Even the slavishly pro-government media has begun to acknowledge
that a political shift is taking place. In a comment in the New
Straits Times on April 28, the Malaysian Institute of Economic
Research director Mohamed Ariff declared: Malaysian politics
will never be the same again. It is indeed heartening that Malaysia
has come of age, with its people looking beyond mundane issues
transcending ethnic boundaries, focusing on such loftier issues
as institutional integrity, social justice and civil rights.
The Star on March 23 warned government members that
Barisan stalwarts will have to accept the political reality
after the March 8 political tsunami. It pointed in particular
to the breakdown of the communal politics on which UMNO has relied
for the past half century to divide voters along ethnic lines.
The political tsunami did not happen without the combination
of Malay, Chinese and Indian voters who wanted change. There was
cross-ethnicity voting, with Malays voting for DAP and the non-Malays
readily backing PAS, the newspaper stated.
The opposition was able to tap into widespread dissatisfaction,
including among the majority Malays, with rising prices, deepening
social inequality, the lack of elementary democratic rights and
rampant favoritism for a relatively thin layer of well-to-do Malays
and Malay businesses closely associated with UMNO. Among the first
steps taken by opposition-controlled state governments was to
renounce the New Economic Policy, which discriminates against
Chinese and Indians in education, business and government jobs.
Reforms promised
Prime Minister Abdullah is desperately seeking to shore up
his own position within UMNO amid calls for his resignation. Starting
on April 19, he announced a series of reforms to try to boost
his popularity and fend off criticism from within the political
establishment.
A commission is to be established to make the nomination, appointment
and promotion of judges more transparent and end the governments
notorious manipulation of the judiciary. Abdullah indicated that
former chief judge Lord President Salleh Abbas and five other
judges sacked in a politically motivated purge by Mahathir Mohamad
in 1988 would be paid compensation.
The number of officers employed by the state Anti-Corruption
Agency is to be increased from 2,000 to 7,000. The agency is to
receive commission status and report annually to parliament, as
well as to the Prime Ministers office.
Abdullah also announced a plan to ensure food security by spending
$US1.3 billion to increase Malaysias rice production from
around 65 percent of national consumption to 100 percent. High
food and fuel prices were one of the main issues in the March
election.
Abdullah told the press on April 21 that his reforms were not
prompted by election losses but were pledges contained in BNs
2004 election manifesto that had been delayed because of other
priorities. No one believes this threadbare pretext, least of
all those within UMNO seeking to replace the prime minister.
Former prime minister Mahathir Mohammed has been openly campaigning
for Abdullah to be replaced by deputy prime minister Najib Razak.
Mahathir has supported a call by former finance minister Tengku
Razaleigh Hamzah for an extraordinary general meeting of UMNO
to resolve the leadership question.
In late April the Batu Pahat UMNO division called for Abdullah
to resign before the UMNO conference in December. In a separate
comment, Mukhriz Mahathir, son of the former prime minister, warned
that if Abdullah did not step down there could be a further split
in UMNO. Abdullahs resignation, he said, would allow the
party to close ranks and go about reclaiming its political pride
battered in the March election.
There is broader unease in conservative ruling circles. Already
two state sultans, including Terengganu Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin
who is currently serving as king, have defied Abdullah by refusing
to uphold the prime ministers nomination for the post of
state chief minister. The king also refused last year to approve
two judicial appointments reportedly because he believed they
were corrupt.
Behind this political turmoil are sharp divisions over economic
policy. After expelling Anwar in 1998, Mahathir imposed a series
of capital and currency controls that, for a period, appeared
to stabilise the Malaysian economy. After replacing Mahathir in
2003, Abdullah eased these measures, shelved several high-profile
infrastructure investments and tried to boost foreign investment,
prompting increasingly vitriolic opposition from his predecessor.
At the same time, opposition parties have been critical of the
government for not going far enough in removing economic restrictions
and ending corruption and nepotism.
These tensions have been further fuelled by signs of an economic
slowdown in the US and internationally which is expected to cut
manufactured exports by 1.6 percent this year. While the decline
will be offset by higher commodity prices for exports of palm
oil and rubber, Malaysias economic growth is expected to
slow from 6.3 percent in 2007 to 5.5 percent in 2008.
In comments to Associated Press on April 22, Anwar made clear
that the main aim of the opposition was not to address popular
concerns. It is not very difficult to be a better government,
to control corruption, to be more just, to improve the quality
of education, public health, to stop the squandering of billions
of dollars on your family members and cronies. That is quite easy,
he declared. The main challenge, Anwar explained, was to change
the course of the country and to promote economic competitiveness
and a market economy.
The implementation of market reforms will, however, only deepen
social inequality and prompt popular opposition. As DAP parliamentarian
Charles Santiago warned in an Asia Times article in March,
the vote for the opposition parties was not an endorsement of
free-market policies. The average Malay was feeling the
increase in prices, their jobs were no longer protected and inflation
was eating their income ... You had a situation where you had
subsidies for the rich and a free market economy for the poor.
Whether or not Abdullah and UMNO hang onto power, the present
political turmoil is likely to be the prelude to an even greater
crisis.
See Also:
Government election losses
in Malaysia signal eruption of deep political crisis
[11 March 2008]
Malaysians due to vote after
stunted 13-day election campaign
[6 March 2008]
Malaysia to go to polls one
year early
[26 February 2008]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |