ON THE
WSWS
Donate
to
the WSWS!
News Feed
Contact
the
WSWS
Editorial
Board
New
Today
News
& Analysis
Workers
Struggles
Arts
Review
History
Science
Polemics
Philosophy
Correspondence
Archive
About
WSWS
About
the ICFI
Help
Books
Online
OTHER
LANGUAGES
German
French
Italian
Russian
Polish
Czech
Serbo-Croatian
Spanish
Portuguese
Turkish
Sinhala-
Tamil
Indonesian
LEAFLETS
Download
in
PDF format
|
|
WSWS
: Arts Review : Music and Literature
A.K. Voronsky's "Art as the Cognition of Life"
Art as the discovery of truths, large and small
Review by Adrian Falk
19 September 1998
Art as the Cognition of Life, Selected Writings 1911-1936,
Aleksandr Konstantinovich Voronsky,
Mehring Books, Michigan, 1998,
ISBN 0-929087-76-3, 554 pages, US$29.95
This book is a revelation in many ways. It brings to vivid life some
of the critical disputes between classical Marxism and its opponents in
the 1920s; it develops a positive method of literary and art criticism which
is of burning contemporary relevance; it elaborates a philosophy of art
which stands on the shoulders of the greatest nineteenth century thinkers
and writers; it exemplifies the greatest critical tradition in history,
which Stalin and his cohorts exterminated out of fear; and it is written
in the most lucid, attractive, compelling and direct style.
The political roots of Stalin's genocide against the socialist opponents
of the Soviet bureaucracy is best analysed in another publication of Mehring
Books, Vadim Rogovin's 1937: Stalin's Year of Terror. In these writings
of Voronsky we hear a voice from the other side of that river of blood in
which the bureaucracy drowned the progressive socialist culture which made
the Russian Revolution. And what an outstanding voice it is.
Anyone who has been repelled by the doctrinaire intellectual fakery of
Stalinist "socialist realism" and has looked for a critical method
which approaches artworks as contributing to human knowledge and sensitivity
in their own ways, rather than mechanically reducing them to an abstract
and false class criterion, will discover here a leading representative of
genuine Marxism who knew how to uncover and articulate the truth which is
contained in great literature. He does this in rich detail and in many colours.
And anyone who has tried to labour their way through the schools of formalism,
semiotics, hermeneutics, postmodernism and the rest, which infest the worlds
of academic and radical criticism, will want to keep this book close by
and consult it regularly for many years to come.
The translator and editor of this book, Frederick S. Choate, provides
a brief introduction to the author in his foreword:
"Aleksandr Konstantinovich Voronsky was born in the small town of
Khoroshavka, in the Russian province of Tambov, in September 1884. He was
shot by a Stalinist executioner on August 13, 1937, and buried in a mass
grave on the outskirts of Moscow. With a life that spanned one of the stormiest
periods of modern history, Voronsky actively participated in the revolutions
of 1905 and 1917, the building of the first Soviet regime, and the struggle
against its degeneration. He participated as an underground Bolshevik, political
exile, leading member of various committees in state power, editor of several
influential newspapers and journals, as an oppositionist, once again as
an exile, and finally as a persecuted 'Old Bolshevik,' who, like the majority
of Marxist revolutionaries of his generation, sought ways to survive in
a regime increasingly hostile to everything for which he had fought."
(Editor's Foreword. Unattributed quotations below are from this source.)
After the October Revolution Voronsky held responsible party positions
first in Odessa, and then from 1918 to 1920 in Ivanovo, described by Choate
as the third most important Bolshevik stronghold after Petrograd and Moscow.
Amongst his responsibilities in Ivanovo was the editorship of the newspaper
Workers' Land; four of some four hundred articles which he wrote
for it are contained in this collection. In 1921, on the basis of the quality
of this work, he was called to Moscow where "he founded and became
the first chief editor of the journal Red Virgin Soil, which was
the best literary journal of the 1920s."
At this time--after the ravages of the Civil War--the work of economic
reconstruction preoccupied the working class and its revolutionary leadership.
Choate writes:
"Raising the cultural level of the broad masses was crucial to the
country's recovery, and Voronsky was one of many who devoted themselves
to this painstaking work. Some of the greatest challenges in this regard
came from unexpected places: not from open enemies of the revolution, but
from poorly educated supporters of the Soviet regime in general, and from
representatives of the 'Proletarian Culture' movement in particular."
The central strand in Voronsky's literary itinerary of the 1920s originated
in the struggle against the Proletcult. This movement claimed that a purely
proletarian culture could be built, and that this required the rejection
of all the cultural achievements of the past, on the grounds that these
were aristocratic or bourgeois in essence. It was a mass movement "embracing
perhaps 400,000 members by 1920," and the struggle against it raised
fundamental issues in the philosophy of Marxism. Lenin wrote, "Marxism
has by no means discarded the most valuable achievements of the bourgeois
epoch, but, on the contrary, has assimilated and reworked everything that
was valuable in the more than two thousand-year development of human thought
and culture" (quoted in Foreword). To suppose it possible to leap over
and ignore this entire heritage of mankind would be to sabotage in advance
the struggle for a human, classless, socialist culture.
The false historical perspectives of the Proletcult were analysed in
detail by Leon Trotsky, especially in Chapter 6 of his book Literature
and Revolution, to which Voronsky's writings correspond closely. Indeed
the struggle against the Proletcult began to merge itself with the larger
fight which Trotsky led against the bureaucratisation of the party, and
then against the theory of socialism in a single country, which came to
define the political course of the bureaucracy. Voronsky is a major spokesman
of the Left Opposition, and his writings enable us to grasp concretely the
tremendous intellectual stature of this tendency, the forerunner of the
Fourth International.
It is not possible in a review of reasonable length to introduce all
the materials contained in this book. But certain major threads and motives
underpin the outlook of essays which address many different subjects. The
heart of this outlook, to which Voronsky returns again and again, is best
stated in his own words, as follows, in the essay which gives its title
to the collection:
"What is art? First of all, art is the cognition of life.
Art is not the free play of fantasy, feelings and moods; art is not the
expression of merely the subjective sensations and experiences of the poet;
art is not assigned the goal of primarily awakening in the reader 'good
feelings.' Like science, art cognizes life. Both art and science have the
same subject: life, reality. But science analyzes, art synthesizes; science
is abstract, art is concrete; science turns to the mind of man, art to his
sensual nature. Science cognizes life with the help of concepts, art with
the aid of images in the form of living, sensual contemplation." (p.
98)
With one stroke all those aesthetic prejudices which try to limit art
to the realm of the sentiments, to mere decoration and to a peripheral place
in the development of human knowledge, are cut away. Art is not something
whose call on people's attention needs justification. On the contrary it
belongs with science in the centre of the most human vocations: the discovery
of truths, large and small, and their social dissemination as the property
of all, in the banishment of ignorance, superstition and backwardness. Later
Voronsky writes:
"To evaluate a work aesthetically means to determine the extent
to which the content corresponds to the form; in other words, the extent
to which the content corresponds to objective artistic truth. For the artist
thinks in images: the image must be artistically true, i.e. it must correspond
to the nature of what is portrayed. In this lies perfection and beauty in
the work of an artist. A false idea, a false content cannot find a perfected
form." (p.120)
On the basis of this fundamental principle of materialist literary criticism
Voronsky engages in the defence of the works of the fellow-travellers (nonparty
intellectuals and writers who have gravitated towards the Soviet regime
and who seek to contribute to its constructive work) against the attacks
from the Proletcultists around such journals as On Guard. Repeatedly
he returns to the discussion of writers like Vsevolod Ivanov, Seifullina,
Tikhonov, Malyshkin, Pilniak, Zoschenko and others, who for all their limitations
are creating artistically honest depictions of life, of the huge convulsion
through which Russian society is passing, of the real experience of the
peasants, and so on. Rejecting such writers as "petty bourgeois,"
the Proletcultists never inquire to what extent their writings contain elements
of artistic objective truth, and thus seek to cut off the working class
from the insights, the enlightenment, the elevation of the human stature,
which such writings contain.
This aesthetic method, the principle of art as the cognition of life,
was not invented by Voronsky, but was defended by him as a conquest of Marxist
theory. In two essays on Plekhanov he draws to our attention the outstanding
contribution of that older Marxist to the theoretical armament of the socialist
movement. It was Plekhanov's profound mastery of dialectics, of the writings
of Hegel, Feuerbach, Marx and Engels, as well as his detailed study of the
great nineteenth century revolutionary democrats Belinsky, Chernyshevsky
and others, which fostered the achievements of Marxist criticism in that
great socialist culture which Stalinism was later to liquidate.
The following essays (many published originally in Russian as pamphlets)
develop this method, and form the backbone of the collection: "Art
as the Cognition of Life" (1923); "On Art" (1925); "Notes
on Artistic Creativity" (1927); "On Artistic Truth" and "The
Art of Seeing the World" (1928). But aspects, details and concretisations
are ubiquitous throughout the book.
The collection contains essays in appreciation of Gorky, Pilniak, Esenin
and other writers. There is a stimulating and closely-argued article on
"Freudianism and Art". There are sketches of revolutionary figures
and polemics against enemies. There are five appendices of documents from
the 1920s which trace the unfolding of the crisis in artistic policy. And
there is much more which readers will undoubtedly seize upon, as exemplary
pieces of living criticism and theory.
Voronsky also returns frequently to the writings of L.N. Tolstoy, in
illustration of numerous issues and points which he argues in connection
with artistic truth. I conclude this review by outlining one such place.
In "On Art" Voronsky opens his discussion with a quotation from
Anna Karenina, from the pages where Vronsky and Anna meet with the artist
Mikhailov. Voronsky describes these pages as "filled with meaning,
simplicity and artistic truth." In the passage in which Mikhailov uses
an accidental candle grease spot on a drawing to unlock the pose which he
had been striving to capture, Voronsky finds the basis of a reply to those
who belittle the creative element in art. He quotes from Tolstoy:
"[Mikhailov] laughed with joy, for the inanimate, unnatural figure
had become alive, and was just the thing. The figure was alive, clear, and
well defined. It was possible to correct the drawing to accord with the
requirements of the pose."
What Tolstoy wrote about Mikhailov's intuitive and inspired modification
of the drawing--for example, his use of the word "suddenly" three
times in as many paragraphs--shows an elementary truth about artistic creativity,
and it is in this sense that Tolstoy is a realist. In this and thousands
of other episodes his eye is so accurately attuned to a vital and revealing
truth, that his readers are drawn in to that truth. A few pages later Voronsky
writes:
"Darwin discovered and explained the origin of species. L.N. Tolstoy
discovered Platon Karataev, Eroshka, Anna, Natasha, Pierre and Kutuzov.
Each acted as a genuine innovator, but one proved while the other showed.
The true artist, like the true scientist, always adds to what existed before
him."
This is merely a sample, almost at random, from the symphony of critical
insights contained in this work. In this review I have attempted simply
to introduce the book and to suggest its great strength and beauty. The
detailed absorption of its message will occupy and inspire its readers for
a significant portion of their future lives.
Purchase Art as
the Cognition of Life online
See Also:
New release from Mehring Books
Art as the Cognition of Life
By Aleksandr Konstantinovich Voronsky
[2 September 1998]
Remarks of Frederick
Choate, the translator of Voronsky's Art as the Cognition of Life
[2 September 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |