|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : North
America : The
Brutal Society
Prosecutors, media distorted case against Chicago boys charged
with murder
By Helen Halyard
15 August 1998
Two southside Chicago boys charged with murder, aged 7 and
8, were released to the custody of their parents Thursday after
a six-hour hearing before a local judge. Cook County Juvenile
Court Judge Gerald Winiecki overrode the objections of the prosecutor's
office, deferring to the findings of a court-appointed psychologist
and psychiatrist who said they did not think the two boys posed
a danger to others. The boys were confined to their homes with
electronic monitors, pending a trial now set for August 28.
As more information has been released about the circumstances
of the death of 11-year-old Ryan Harris, it has become clear that
the initial reports by the prosecution and the media were grossly
distorted. While prosecutor Michael Oppenheimer declared that
the case was one of "a brutal murder," the statements
which the boys allegedly gave to their police interrogators appear
to describe a tragic accident, not a crime.
Ryan Harris was riding her bike with one of the boys when the
other boy began throwing rocks at them. One rock hit the girl
and she fell from her bike and struck her head heavily on the
ground. One of the boys allegedly told police that the two dragged
the girl's body into the weeds. The other boy claimed to have
left the scene as soon as Ryan fell off her bike.
At a police briefing and again during a hearing in front of
Judge Winiecki, the police stated that they did not believe the
death of Ryan Harris was a premeditated killing, or even that
she was intentionally struck by the rock. It was in the context
of these statements that the police detectives speculated that
the boys might have wanted to steal Harris's blue bicycle.
These carefully hedged statements were transformed by Oppenheimer
and the media into allegations that the two boys--both less than
four feet tall--were murderers, gang-rapists and thieves. The
prosecutor, adamant that the boys be tried for murder, pointed
to them in court and exclaimed, "they stashed her bike, and
then, just making sure the whole thing was complete, made sure
she was asphyxiated."
It is significant that residents of the southside neighborhood
where the boys lived, and even the mother of the victim, Sabrina
Harris, have not shared this reaction. Upon hearing reports that
the two boys had confessed to killing her daughter, Mrs. Harris
expressed grave doubts about their guilt and asked if she could
see them. Speaking to the Chicago Tribune, she said, "She
had two sisters, one 7 and one 8, and she could run circles around
them. She was a tomboy, she was strong."
Other residents from the neighborhood where the children lived
expressed skepticism about police reports. On Friday USA Today
carried a prominent report headlined, "Shock turns to doubt
in Chicago," which cited the growing belief in the Englewood
neighorhood, where the killing took place, that the two boys were
"being railroaded."
The statements allegedly given by the boys to the police have
been widely challenged as coerced, since the boys were interrogated
individually by teams of five policemen, without the presence
of their parents or guardians, let alone an attorney. Under such
circumstances young children can be convinced to say almost anything.
Media sensationalism
The Ryan Harris case is a clear example of the way that media
works with state prosecutors to sensationalize violent crime.
Every element of the case was distorted, beginning with the characterization
of Harris's death as a murder, which then required identifying
the two boys as murderers.
Typical was the article in the August 11 Detroit Free Press,
headlined, "Boys, 7 and 8, to be tried in killing; Kids wanted
bike from girl, 11; police say she was molested." Reuters
international news service had the following headline: "Chicago
boys, 7 and 8, describe murder."
Reports on the television networks were equally sensationalized,
aided by the coincidence of the juvenile court hearing for the
two youth, aged 12 and 14, arrested for the Jonesboro, Arkansas
school shootings. Footage of Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden
was shown, followed by reporting on the Ryan Harris case, thus
creating the impression that the two Chicago boys were guilty
of a similar homicidal attack.
The most direct connection between the two events was made
by the Detroit Free Press, whose August 12 front-page headline
read, "What should we do with young killers?", followed
by articles on the Jonesboro and Chicago cases.
In keeping with the media's fixation on the sickest and most
depraved aspects of American life, the murder was depicted as
a sex-crime, although there is no indication that the two boys
either intended or were capable of such an act.
A local psychiatrist, Carl Bell, head of the Community Mental
Health Council in southside Chicago, said a more likely explanation
for their alleged actions was childish curiosity. "That's
very common behavior among children," he told USA Today.
"But adults are projecting adult, sadistic, sexual predation
and intent on these two little boys."
A political agenda
What purpose was served by the rush to judgment in the Ryan
Harris case? The tragic events were distorted to fit a ready-made
template--the transformation of American children, especially
in poor and minority neighborhoods, into savage predators capable
of adult crimes--in order to back a definite political agenda.
According to one expert, there were 17 children under the age
of 10 arrested for murder in the United States in 1996. Younger
and younger defendants have been put on trial as adults, each
case setting a new national benchmark for prosecutors who have
sought to lower the age even further. In response to the Ryan
Harris case, one Chicago newspaper columnist suggested that children
as young as five years old knew the difference between right and
wrong, and therefore should bear the full consequences of their
actions.
For some time now a campaign has been underway to eliminate
the distinction in criminal justice procedure between adults and
children. This is an attempt to turn back the clock to the period
before the development of juvenile courts and specialized facilities
for youth, in the 1890s, when youthful offenders were thrown into
adult facilities and no attempt was made to provide programs aimed
at rehabilitation.
Significant in this regard is the account of the Chicago case
in the Detroit Free Press, which was accompanied by a separate
article headlined, "In Michigan, Age is Not a Factor."
The newspaper noted that a 1997 change in Michigan law allows
a child of any age charged with a serious crime to be "designated"
for adult trial in juvenile court. Two 12-year-olds who are awaiting
murder trials in Michigan, Nathaniel Abraham and McKinley Moore,
can be sent to an adult prison if convicted.
When such horrible events take place, the media never examines
the underlying social causes, instead blaming the young children
involved, inciting popular hatred of them and advocating the severest
prosecution and sentencing. The aim is to create an emotional
atmosphere in which it will be impossible to probe more deeply
into the issues which are raised. What kind of society creates
conditions where children kill children? What kind of society
criminalizes its own children?
A concerted effort has been made by the ruling class to inure
masses of people, themselves the victims of exploitation, to accept
growing levels of social inequality and to blame the individual,
rather than society, for the social evils it creates.
See Also:
Two more US children face
murder charges
[31 July 1998]
The case of Nathaniel Abraham:
background to the prosecution of a child for murder
[2 July 1998]
The shooting in Oregon:
Alienation, adolescence and violence
[23 May 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |