|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Ireland
The Omagh bombing and the dead-end of nationalism
By Chris Marsden
18 August 1998
Saturday's car bombing of Omagh is the worst terrorist atrocity
in 28 years of the Troubles in Northern Ireland. The explosion
that led to the loss of 28 lives has shocked the entire world.
The 500-pound bomb ripped through the town centre at 3.10pm, when
it was packed with shoppers. An advance warning was unclear as
to the bomb's precise location. Police moved people down to an
area where the explosion then occurred. Among the dead were nine
children, 13 women (one of whom was pregnant) and six men. Some
220 people were injured, many severely. Both Catholics and Protestants
were amongst the dead and maimed.
In the immediate aftermath of the bombing, British Prime Minister
Tony Blair, Irish premier Bertie Ahern and US President Bill Clinton,
all called for severe action against the killers and pledged a
united security operation on both sides of the border. Blair said
they would be "hunted down", whilst Ahern promised his
government would "ruthlessly suppress" those responsible.
The reintroduction of internment without trial was mooted as a
possibility.
Blame was immediately placed at the door of the Real IRA (RIRA),
a small breakaway republican group opposed to Sinn Fein's acceptance
of the Northern Ireland Agreement drawn up by the British, Irish
and American governments. The 32 Counties Sovereignty Movement
headed by Michael McKevitt and his wife Bernadette, the sister
of IRA hunger striker Bobby Sands, has been linked to the RIRA
but deny this. No one has so far admitted responsibility, but
the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) said the code-word warning
was used in an earlier bombing by the RIRA in Banbridge, County
Down. Five men have been detained by the RUC after dawn arrests
on Monday, including a relative of a leading member of the 32
Counties movement.
Amidst the widespread grief and legitimate outrage, it is necessary
for workers to draw their own independent conclusions from this
tragedy. The Omagh bombing is a criminal and reprehensible act
that does not advance the interests of Irish workers or the struggle
against imperialism. The opposite is the case.
The aim of the bombing was to re-ignite sectarian hostilities
between Catholic and Protestant in the face of the widespread
desire for an end to this fruitless conflict. The dissident republican
groups blamed for the action broke with Sinn Fein for endorsing
the Northern Ireland Agreement. They claim that continuing a bombing
campaign will undermine British imperialism, forcing a resumption
of hostilities and in so doing galvanise the masses into a struggle
for Irish independence.
Omagh has enabled the imperialist powers to present themselves
as guardians of peace and to legitimise security operations that
would have been impossible to conduct in an earlier period. Cross-border
security sweeps are now being directed at the arrest of political
figures linked to the RIRA, but such repressive powers ceded to
the British and Irish states today will inevitably be used against
the entire working class tomorrow.
More fundamentally, the bombing of Omagh has been used to reinforce
the assertion that the only alternative to the Northern Ireland
Agreement is a resumption of sectarian violence. As The Sun
stated in its usual arrogant style, "you are either for
peace or for murder. There is no middle road".
After 30 years, Sinn Fein and the IRA have proved incapable
of securing the basic social interests of working class Catholics
and were no nearer to achieving their stated goal of a united
Ireland. This was recognised by the party's leadership when the
IRA called a cease-fire two years ago. The massive endorsement
of the Northern Ireland Agreement in the referendums on May 22
amongst Catholics expressed this widespread disillusionment with
the traditional politics of nationalism.
But in the absence of a genuine socialist alternative capable
of unifying the working class in defence of their independent
social and political interests, it has been possible for the ruling
class and its political representatives to utilise this sentiment
in order to create illusions in the so-called "peace process".
Sinn Fein's endorsement of the Northern Ireland Agreement has
been vital for the imperialist powers to present it as a means
of securing peace and prosperity and as an expression of the democratic
aspirations of all Irish people. The reality is very different.
The considerations shaping the Agreement were exclusively those
of the ruling class. In order to develop Ireland as an investment
location for the global corporations seeking access to Europe,
it was necessary to bring military conflict to an end and to develop
cross-border trade and investment with the South. All of this
was stated openly. What remained unsaid by any of the participants
in the peace talks is that attracting international capital requires
the destruction of the extensive social welfare provisions and
the systematic lowering of wages and conditions.
To this end the unionist and republican parties have been given
a joint veto over all policy-making in the new Northern Ireland
Assembly. This provides them with a virtual state-enforced monopoly
on political life, designed to counteract any movement of workers
against big business that cuts across the sectarian divide.
It is in light of these political changes that the demands
now being made on Sinn Fein to deal with republican dissidents
must be assessed. The British press is full of articles and editorials
calling on Sinn Fein to take the lead in neutralising the anti-Agreement
groups. Typical is that by Kevin Toolis in the Guardian,
in which he calls for the perpetrators to receive, "a good
political kicking in front of the nationalist community of Ireland
by their fellow Irishmen."
Though never officially stated, policing their respective "communities"
was one of the key demands placed on both the republican and unionist
paramilitaries in the all-party talks. Sinn Fein has made clear
its willingness to accept such a role. In the immediate aftermath
of the bombing, Gerry Adams took the unprecedented step of unequivocally
condemning the military activities of a republican group. His
deputy, Martin McGuinness went further, stating that the RIRA
was probably responsible for the bombing and predicting a "massive
backlash within the republican and nationalist community".
The Omagh bombing and its aftermath underscores the utter bankruptcy
of all the bourgeois nationalist groups, whether those advocating
the continuation of the armed struggle, or Sinn Fein itself. In
the first instance, the murderous actions of a handful of nationalist
extremists are being utilised to advocate the systematic abrogation
of democratic rights, all in the name of "preserving democracy".
In the second, the nationalists themselves are being refashioned
as political defenders of the status quo and future instruments
of state repression.
See Also:
Unionist violence continues
in Northern Ireland
[16 July 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |