|
WSWS
: News &
Analysis : Sport
Issues
Hypocrisy surrounds international cricket scandal
By Mike Head
12 December 1998
The revelation that two of Australia's best-known cricketers,
leg-spin bowler Shane Warne and batsman Mark Waugh, took cash
from an Indian bookmaker during a tour of the sub-continent in
1994 has provoked bitter recriminations in the mass media. Headlines
have included "Ashamed", "Sack them" and "Cricket
stars humiliate national game".
It seems that the bookmaker paid Waugh $6,000 and Warne $5,000
for information about the weather and the state of the pitch before
the Australian team's one-day games in Sri Lanka and Pakistan
during September and October, 1994. Waugh and Warne delivered
matching accounts of these transactions at an Australian Cricket
Board (ACB) media conference last Wednesday, describing themselves
as "naïve" and "stupid".
Until journalists finally broke the story last week, the affair
had been covered up for four years by the Australian and international
cricketing authorities. In February 1995 the Sydney Morning
Herald reported that Pakistan cricket captain Salim Malik
had offered bribes of $US200,000 each to Waugh, Warne and a team
mate, Tim May, to play badly in Pakistan during the October 1994
tour. The next day it was revealed that in Colombo in 1992 another
Australian cricketer, Dean Jones, had refused an offer of $US50,000
to provide information to bookmakers.
When this news emerged, all members of the Australian team,
then on tour in New Zealand, were questioned by an ACB official,
Ian McDonald, about whether they had been involved with bookmakers.
Waugh and Warne immediately told McDonald of their payments from
the Indian bookmaker.
However, leading figures in both the ACB and the British-based
International Cricket Council decided to keep the matter confidential.
Waugh was secretly fined $10,000 and Warne $8,000. Other members
of the Australian team were not told. The official silence continued
even after Waugh and the Australian captain, Mark Taylor, gave
evidence last October 7 to a Pakistani judicial inquiry into alleged
match-fixing by Malik and other Pakistan cricket players.
As a numerous commentators have pointed out, the Indian bookmaker's
offer to Waugh and Warne was almost certainly intended to be a
prelude to wider and more lucrative involvement in match-fixing.
If Waugh, Warne and May were approached by Malik just a month
later it was hardly coincidental.
Matthew Engel, editor of the authoritative Wisden Cricketers'
Almanack, has commented that gambling and corruption have
become widespread in international cricket. He condemned the authorities
for singling out Waugh and Warne for retribution.
Gambling is, in fact, an inevitable outcome of the transformation
of cricket, like every other major sport, into a multi-billion
dollar entertainment business. Cricket was once regarded as a
"gentlemen's game," strictly reserved for amateurs.
Today, millions of dollars can often ride on the outcome of a
game or a series, not just because of the bets laid worldwide
but also the television, advertising and sponsorship revenues
that depend on continued success. In this arena, everything is
for sale, including the players.
In an editorial, Rupert Murdoch's Sydney Daily Telegraph
accused Waugh and Warne of "wounding the soul of a nation".
It went on to brand them as greedy because "they accepted
the grubby cash of a criminal".
Hypocrisy knows no bounds when media barons like Murdoch and
Kerry Packer lead a hue and cry about greed. Their companies and
others like them have turned athletes--whether their sport is
cricket, basketball, football, swimming, boxing or track and field--into
money-making commodities. Murdoch and Packer made their own unique
contributions. Packer set up his own televised world cricket competition
in the late 1970s and bought the best players in a bid to takeover
the official game. Murdoch recently attempted the same in rugby
league.
As a result of these processes, Waugh and Warne, two of the
finest cricketers in the world, have become highly profitable
marketing tools. Business Review Weekly estimates that
Warne was paid $1.1 million last year, with most coming from sponsors
like Nike, Just Jeans, Oakley Sunglasses, Melbourne's Crown Casino
(so much for the moralising about gambling!), Nicorette, Sony
Music and Gunn & Moore cricket bats. He also works for Packer
as a sports commentator on Channel Nine. Even so, he ranks only
number 18 on the list of Australia's top sports money earners.
When Warne's sponsors, led by Nike, declared that they would
retain his services in advertising campaigns despite the perceived
tarnishing of his image, their calculations were purely commercial.
As Ian Dresner, managing director of the Rebel Sports chain, made
clear, sports stores were concerned that the adverse publicity
would hurt the Christmas sales of products that Warne had endorsed.
In the end, the sponsors estimated that the affair had not severely
damaged his marketability and selling power.
No doubt, the cricket officials weighed up similar factors
when they covered up the affair in 1995. How would the scandal
affect their commercial revenues? This is a social milieu and
an economic system that reduces every human relation to one of
money.
Hypocrisy has also abounded on the question of gambling. Most
media pundits have declared it to be an uncontrolled problem in
India or elsewhere in the so-called Third World. Yet sizeable
proportions of the state budgets of the Kennett and Carr governments,
in office in Victoria and New South Wales respectively, are now
drawn directly from the human misery created by poker machines,
casinos, lotteries and a myriad of other forms of gambling. NSW
alone has 10 percent of the world's poker machines.
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of the affair is the anxiety
expressed by media barons and politicians alike about the damage
done to the so-called national spirit. "Whether you're a
cricket fan or not, the game is our national sport," wrote
one of Murdoch's columnists, Miranda Devine. "In a way it
has represented all that was good about Australia--sun-blessed,
clean-cut, languid, sportsmanlike and victorious. Now our pleasure
in the image of Australia that cricket projected to the world
is ash in our mouths."
Prime Minister Howard also felt compelled to comment. He claimed
to "share with millions of Australians an intense feeling
of disappointment" at the revelations. "Australians
love their cricket and anything that looks as though it is knocking
cricket off its pedestal is something that does deeply disturb
Australians."
Clearly, much is at stake here. Cricket and other sports such
as swimming and football have often been used to divert people's
attention away from social crises and to promote a national ethos.
Only several weeks ago, a triple century by Mark Taylor in Peshawar,
Pakistan was greeted with headlines comparing him to the great
batsman of the 1930s, Sir Donald Bradman. The Australian
commented that Taylor's innings could rally the nation in the
face of adversity in the same way that Bradman's feats did during
the Great Depression.
Historically, the Australian ruling class has lacked a national
ideology of substance. It is difficult to claim legitimacy from
a heritage of massacring Aborigines and seizing their land, fashioning
a "White Australia" policy to exclude the Asian masses
and exploiting post-war immigrants as cheap labour. Over the past
century, sport, combined with the glorification of wartime sacrifices,
has become central to the cultivation of a semi-official Australian
national identity.
The underlying issues are by no means confined to Australia.
Worldwide, sport has become a means of whipping up nationalism,
while promoting all manner of illusions in the prospects of ordinary
youth to achieve financial success through sporting prowess. Sport
has become synonymous with flag-waving and patriotic fervour,
combined with hero-worship of athletes who have become marketing
icons. Gambling and corruption, as well as other features such
as drug-taking by aspiring sports stars, are the intrinsic results.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |