|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Waiting-list for hospital treatment in Britain reaches record
level
By Robert Stevens
2 June 1998
Department of Health figures announced on May 21 show that
the number of people on National Health Service waiting-lists
has risen by 37,500 in the first three months of this year. The
overall number waiting for hospital treatment is just under 1.3
million people, the highest ever.
Last year, the new Labour government pledged to cut the NHS
waiting-list by 100,000 and reverse the decay of public health
that had taken place under the Conservatives. Since then, 140,000
people have been added to the waiting-list. Those waiting over
a year for treatment number 68,020. In the London regions of North
and South Thames over 400,000 people are on the list.
NHS funding is now below the average allocated by the Conservatives.
In Parliament, Prime Minister Blair insisted that any spending
on health had to be "consistent with a strong control on
public finances." The financing that is being made available
is being dispersed on the basis of eroding the previous ethos
of co-operation and sharing resources within the health service.
On April 9, Labour announced a new system of competition between
hospitals based on "tough targets" to reduce waiting
figures by 167,000 before March 1999. According to Frank Dobson,
the Secretary of State for Health, the purpose of the scheme will
be to identify those hospitals deemed to be failing, and cut their
funding! "There will be rewards for those who hit their targets
and sanctions for those who do not," said Dobson. "Performance
will be closely monitored
a performance fund of £32m
will be used to reward Health Authorities who are in line to hit
their waiting-list targets. This money will be used as a carrot
and stick."
Health Authorities who are on target to cut their waiting-lists
will receive up to a further 10 percent of their initial funding
allocation, but will be expected to do even more operations in
return. Those who fail to meet the target reductions will have
up to 10 percent of their funds diverted to a regional "Waiting-list
Task Force". Task forces of managers and clinicians could
be despatched into Health Authorities to ensure lists are cut.
"We will not tolerate below par performance," warned
Dobson, "we are talking about money for results."
This policy of rewards and sanctions goes much further than
the Tories in establishing a fierce competition over financial
resources in the so-called "internal-NHS market".
Stephen Thornton, chief executive of the NHS confederation,
warned that imposing targets to cut waiting-lists would put intense
pressure on staff. It means "using theatres on evenings and
weekends, persuading doctors, nurses and technicians to work extra
hours and finding enough hospital beds and community nurses to
care for people at home after an operation. The intense focus
on waiting-lists risks skewing clinical priorities and draining
resources from other areas of the NHS, like high quality cancer
and mental health services, that people also care deeply about."
In an attempt to reduce waiting-lists, the Department of Health
announced that £65m is to be spent on providing non-hospital-based
convalescent services for medical and psychiatric patients. The
degrading euphemism for these mainly elderly patients is "bed-blockers".
Labour's assault on the health service is based on the creation
of "Primary Care Groups" (PCGs). Under the PCG system,
health areas will be divided up into populations of 100,000. The
commissioning of health provision will be shifted away from hospitals
to these locally-based PCGs, consisting of doctors and nurses
who are obligated to manage their own budgets. They are to be
piloted alongside 11 newly created Health Action Zones, with more
to be set up in 1999. These zones, located in the most deprived,
inner-city areas, will be the test areas for the new system of
localised health treatment.
The composition of the PCGs will be finalised by the end of
July and will be operational in April next year. A recent survey
of 3,000 health workers, "Primary Care Groups--Policy into
Practice", highlights fears that the changes proposed are
being carried out so rapidly that the structure of the NHS is
being undermined.
Such fears have been given added confirmation by the extraordinary
revelation that Perth Royal Infirmary had employed a 15-year-old
schoolgirl for three hours each weekend to take heart readings
in its cardiovascular unit. One of the nurses who previously carried
out this function was laid off last year. Student nurses and nursing
assistants are not allowed to practice under the age of 17 and
a half in recognition of the emotional maturity required for work
on a hospital ward. The girl, the daughter of a consultant's secretary
at the hospital, was dismissed in the face of public outrage.
See Also:
New moves to privatise education
in Britain
[20 May 1998]
A year of New Labour's "third
way"
[6 May 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |