|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Europe
: Britain
Records reveal germ warfare tests conducted in southern Britain
By Paul Mitchell
29 May 1998
The government releases most official documents in Britain
to the Public Record Office after 30 years. To find a document
you must search among the hundreds of catalogues listed by government
departments. Each one has a title, usually a few words, such as
"1938 Note on Russia", or "Aerial bomb trials".
Either you know what you are looking for or you guess.
Sometimes a diligent researcher unearths a document and brings
it to a wider audience. This seems to have happened with half
a dozen reports about outdoor germ warfare trials in the 1960s.
They have names like "The survival of E.coli in fresh air
-- A comparison of results", or "A massive cross-wind
line release of bacteria".
The authors were scientists employed by the Microbiological
Research Establishment (MRE), part of the Ministry of Defence's
secret Chemical and Biological Defence Establishment site at Porton
Down in southern England. If anyone asked what they were doing,
the scientists were instructed that, "the only permissible
answer is that you are sampling atmospheric pollution for meteorological
research. A persistent questioner may be viewed with suspicion".
There has been growing controversy since the reports were first
mentioned in the press in February 1997, particularly in the southern
coastal counties of Dorset and Devon where most of the trials
took place. Pressure from local residents and representatives
led to the release of further reports earlier this month. They
show that the tests were much larger than previously admitted,
affecting 1 million inhabitants in an area 30 miles by 150 miles.
These tests continued into the 1970s and involved the US military.
In some of the trials a ship, the Icewhale, fired "massive
quantities" of bacteria inland. The reports show that on
each of 32 occasions, it pumped up to 550 litres of concentrate
containing billions of bacteria into the air as a fine mist. Scientists
used sensors on land to try and detect the mist as it passed by.
Similar trials took place using an aircraft.
In 1997 the Conservative Party Minister of Defence, Michael
Portillo said the bacteria, "were judged to present no risk
to public health". Pauline Chudley, head of communications
at Dorset Health Authority, said in September 1997 that they had
no knowledge of the trials. "All these germs are found normally
in the environment and would not have been considered as capable
of causing illness," she added. The Labour Party repeated
the same message. Dennis Healey, Labour Minister of Defence at
the time, says he did not know about the tests. Current Armed
Forces Minister John Reid said, "The scientists who carried
out the trials concluded at the time that they in no way posed
a threat to public health".
Despite these reassurances, and a traveling exhibition mounted
by the Ministry of Defence, Trevor Jones, leader of Dorset County
Council said there are still more questions than answers. He repeated
calls for a public inquiry.
A number of questions remain:
Were there any environmental and public health consequences
associated with such a massive exposure to bacteria?
Noreen Hall has been campaigning for years over health problems
in her childhood village of East Lulworth. The village, set in
the heart of the testing area, housed 22 families at the time
of the trials. She has found out that since the 1960s, 16 women
have had miscarriages, some of them up to three. Five children
were born severely disabled and five had learning problems.
The Health Authority is carrying out an investigation but says
there does not appear to be a "cluster". John Howard
a farmer at Wool, a village nearby lost a dozen cattle in the
1960s. Results of samples sent to Porton Down indicated a virulent
strain of E.coli was responsible. Another local person, Colin
Hoskins, who also worked on the Icewhale, now suffers from
skin ulcers.
Why did the MRE stop using live E.coli 162, which officials
say was harmless to humans, halfway through the tests?
One secret report says that, "to avoid the problems and
limitations associated with the release of live vegetative bacteria
(E.coli 162) into the atmosphere", inactivated Serratia marcescens
was used instead. Live Serratia marcescens was blamed for deaths
and injuries when the US military used it in similar tests in
San Francisco in the 1950s.
How safe were the bacterial concentrates?
The scientists at Porton Down had to design a special spray
for the aircraft to prevent corrosion of the aircraft's alloy
skin. Another report says that in order "to prevent the spread
of contamination from the ship, a changing hut was installed on
the jetty in the dockyard in which all MRE personnel working on
the ship kept a complete change of outer clothes and footwear".
Did the scientists carry out safety tests apart from the standard
toxicity experiments on rats? Did they consider the long-term
implications for reproduction?
Were further secret tests carried out?
There are reports of other tests taking place. Gerard Ashton,
for example, is one of 300 human "guinea pigs" trying
to sue the Government over experiments in the 1950s using the
nerve agent, Tabun. Some of them suffer from impotency, breathing
problems and high blood pressure.
The released documents reveal how the British armed forces
have been able to test potentially harmful substances on an unwitting
civilian population. Moreover, despite the claims that such tests
were for purely defensive purposes, it is impossible to conceive
of a situation where germ warfare is used in anything other than
an offensive capacity.
By the end of the tests Britain and its allies knew that bacteria
covered in oil attached to thin spidery "microthreads"
survived longer and large particles penetrated into the lungs
more easily. They had also developed sophisticated spraying equipment
and the techniques to grow vast quantities of bacteria in a short
time.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |