|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: The fall
of Suharto
What the IMF expects of the next Indonesian government
By Peter Symonds
22 May 1998
A key factor in compelling Suharto to resign his post as president
on Thursday was the announcement the previous day by the International
Monetary Fund (IMF), backed by the Clinton administration, of
a delay to further payments to Indonesia from its $US43 billion
rescue package.
Deputy IMF managing director Stanley Fischer cited civil unrest
and uncertainty over Suharto's future as the reason for postponing
a planned disbursement of $1 billion, due on June 4, until "the
political situation clarifies".
The Indonesian economy has been in tatters since the middle
of last year when international investment and loan funds began
to flood out of East Asia, leaving behind massive and unpayable
corporate and government debts and paving the way for IMF intervention.
With the rupiah having lost 80 percent of its value and gyrating
wildly against the US dollar at every step of the political crisis,
the end to IMF assistance threatened to tip Indonesia over the
edge into bankruptcy. From a level of about 2,500 to the dollar
last July to 8,000 when a third IMF plan was signed two months
ago following a tense a month-long standoff, the rupiah slumped
as low as 17,000 this week before "recovering" to around
11,000.
In Jakarta, the widespread rioting and looting last week has
compounded the economic crisis. Estimates put the damage at more
than $1 billion. Nearly 5,000 buildings and 2,000 cars, trucks
and motor cycles were damaged or destroyed. Over 500 bank branches
were attacked. Thirty of the 50 outlets of the Hero supermarket
chain, Indonesia's largest, were burnt or looted.
Many international banks and corporations have since shut their
Indonesian operations, at least temporarily. Without IMF funds,
Indonesia cannot finance the importation of even basic supplies
of food and medicines. Food shortages and rising prices threaten
to trigger further social unrest and rioting.
The IMF decision amounted to a vote of no confidence by the
international money markets in Suharto and, in particular, his
plans announced on Tuesday for gradual political reforms leading
to elections and his eventual replacement as president.
Backing the IMF move, US State Department spokesman James Rubin
said the lack of popular support for Suharto had undermined the
regime's ability to remove price subsidies and implement other
austerity measures.
"As we saw when a price change was announced, it led in
part to some of the violence in the streets in recent days. So
part of the reason why other countries in Asia have been able
to pursue economic reform is because the consent of the governed
has existed. In the absence of this kind of political reform,
we do not believe that the economic steps will be as easy to take,"
Rubin said.
In other words, the purpose of the pressure applied by the
IMF and the US is to fashion a more "democratic" government
as a means of imposing a drastic restructuring of the Indonesian
economy and suppressing opposition to the further lowering of
living standards.
The precise measures to be implemented have been set out in
detail in three successive IMF plans over the last nine months.
As well as the dismantling of all of the state monopolies, tax
breaks and trade controls enjoyed by the Suharto family and its
close business cronies, the IMF has ordered the abolition of all
forms of national economic regulation and any barriers to the
operation of international investors.
Whatever capitalist government emerges in the next days and
weeks -- whether led by Jusef Habibie or one of the opposition
figures, such as Amien Rais -- the IMF has made clear what its
tasks are. Rais, who today indicated he will run for president,
has already pledged to implement the IMF's plan, warning that
it will mean hardship and "sacrifice".
These measures will not be implemented peacefully or democratically.
Since the beginning of the year, millions have been thrown out
of work and into poverty, surviving from day to day. Rising prices
have placed intolerable strains on working class families.
Just as the so-called democratic regimes in South Korea and
Thailand have not hesitated to use the riot police to break up
demonstrations and strikes against increasing unemployment and
prices, so the next government in Indonesia will be no less repressive
than Suharto's as it imposes the IMF's dictates.
See Also:
Which social classes support the struggle
for democracy in Indonesia?
The lessons of history
[20 May 1998 Also in German
and Indonesian]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |