|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Africa
British Labour government accused of
helping organise counter-coup in Sierra Leone
By Chris Marsden
14 May 1998
Recently British Prime Minister Tony Blair dismissed as "hoo-ha"
a series of charges in the press that his Labour Party government
had collaborated with a mercenary-led force in deposing the military
regime in Sierra Leone. But on May 11, Blair shifted his tactics.
Having for weeks denied any official knowledge of the counter-coup
that ousted Major Johnny Paul Koroma, he declared that his government
had been "quite right" to help reinstate the elected
government of Ahmed Tejan Kabbah.
In fact, Britain led the international campaign to depose Koroma.
When he returned to power, Kabbah praised Britain "for their
support and assistance in every respect."
The coup that brought Koroma to power was carried out on May
25, 1997, and was opposed by Britain, Europe, the US, the United
Nations and the Organisation of African Unity. The official position
of the UN was that the Kabbah government should be restored to
power through peaceful methods.
In October 1997 the United Nations imposed sanctions on Sierra
Leone under UN Security Council Resolution 1132, based on a motion
submitted by Britain, banning the supply of arms and oil products.
As a result, Sierra Leone's already fragile economy was in a state
of collapse by December. Gross Domestic Product fell by 27 percent,
Government revenue was down 60 percent, inflation rose to 250
percent and the value of the country's currency was halved against
the dollar.
Koroma was finally brought down on February 21, 1998 by Nigerian
troops. The military dictatorship of General Sani Abacha in Nigeria
was acting under the auspices of the West African peacekeeping
force, ECOMOG, and through it, the UN. Abacha's military functioned
as a proxy for the major imperialist powers, particularly the
US, who dictated its actions behind the scenes.
The scandal now haunting the Blair government first came to
public attention as early as last August. Canada's Globe and
Mail newspaper reported a plot to use mercenaries to overthrow
Koroma. This involved the exiled Kabbah government, Rakesh Saxena,
head of the Vancouver-based Tidewater Management Corporation,
and Tim Spicer, head of Sandline International, a mercenary group
operating out of London.
Saxena is presently fighting extradition to Thailand in connection
with charges of embezzling $2 billion from one of the country's
largest banks. He holds bauxite concessions in West Africa. In
his letter to Spicer, Saxena made clear that "our offer of
assistance to the Sierra Leone government is undoubtedly motivated
by our desire to establish and perhaps consolidate our position
in that part of the world." Sandline International's chairman,
Tony Buckingham, is a major shareholder in DiamondWorks Ltd.,
a company that owns six diamond-mining properties in Sierra Leone.
Momudo Korona, Minister of Presidential Affairs for the Kabbah
government, told Spicer that he wanted "strategy, logistics,
and training that would convert 40,000 militia into an effective
fighting force." Saxena made an initial payment of $1.5 million
to Sandline International in return for flying in guns and supplies
to Sierra Leone from Bulgaria through Nigeria. But problems developed
in February 1998,when Saxena was arrested in Vancouver after Canadian
authorities discovered he was carrying a Yugoslav passport in
the name of a dead man. This not only delayed a second payment
of $3.5 million for helicopters and heavy weaponry, but prompted
a British Customs and Excise investigation into Sandline International
for breaching the UN embargo.
A search of Sandline International's offices revealed documents
showing that the Kabbah government had paid them £10 million
to train 40,000 members of a Civil Defence Force and supply 35
tons of Bulgarian guns and ammunition to the Nigerian-led ECOMOG
forces, which they did in February.
Faced with prosecution, on April 24 Sandline International's
solicitors sent a confidential letter to Foreign Secretary Robin
Cook stating that the firm had collaborated with leading Foreign
Office personnel and Ministry of Defence officials, as well as
representatives of the US government.
Chronology of Labour's crisis
Nearly two weeks ago the Labour government announced a wider
and "independent" investigation into the affair. Cook
denied that ministerial approval had been given for any plan to
organise a coup.
On May 4 Cook again reiterated that "there is no ministerial
approval, for any activity by Sandline, no contact by ministers
with Sandline, no discussion by ministers with Sandline and we
will robustly resist any claim that there was." The Minister
of State for Africa, Tony Lloyd, told the Commons Foreign Affairs
Committee that Cook was only made aware of the allegations on
May 1. The Times newspaper refuted this, reporting that
Cook was informed of Sandline's operations in February by the
Liberal Democratic peer, Lord Avebury, who had read about it on
the Internet!
On May 6 Cook responded by stating that Lloyd had been shown
papers on the Customs and Excise investigation in mid April, but
was not informed of allegations of Foreign Office contact until
May 1. Cook had been informed of the Customs and Excise investigation
into Sandline International on April 28, but not of allegations
of Foreign Office involvement. Blair promised that ministers or
officials found to have colluded in any breach of the UN would
be disciplined.
On May 7 "well placed officials in Sierra Leone"
were cited in the Guardian claiming that the Foreign Office
was discussing a coup as far back as last August. On May 8, Sandline
International's solicitors released the "strictly private
letter" they had sent on April 24 to Cook, with copies to
George Robertson, the Defence Secretary, Margaret Becket, the
Trade and Industry Secretary, and Dawn Primarolo, Financial Secretary
to the Treasury.
The letter named five officials at the Foreign Office who had
met with Sandline: Peter Penfold, the British High Commissioner
to Sierra Leone, John Everard, then assistant head of the Africa
Department (Equatorial), Craig Murray, who succeeded him, Lynda
St. Cook and Tim Andrews. Also briefed were Lieutenant-Colonel
Peter Hicks, who was in Conakry, Guinea to support Penfold while
he was in exile, and Colonel Andrew Gale, British Military Adviser
to the UN special envoy to Sierra Leone. "Our clients were
led to believe that clearance had been given at head of department
level," the letter stated.
Cook claimed that while Sandline's letter was sent on April
24, he had only returned to the country on April 28 and had only
got around to reading it on May 1. For this story to be credible,
one must believe that not only Cook, but three other ministers
and their departments had not bothered to read a letter charging
the government with collusion with mercenaries in organising a
coup.
The pro-Labour press began to urge a shift to a more aggressive
stance by the government. On May 9, the Independent newspaper
wrote that the UN Security resolution on sanctions served to "prevent
aid going to the ousted President...
"If Britain is to run an ethical foreign policy, it should
include helping restore legitimate democratic rulers where possible.
But preferably without subterfuge. Mr. Cook should in future try
to ensure that the UN's knee-jerk reaction--an arms embargo--is
tempered by the need for flexibility when dealing with genocidal,
illegal regimes."
This line was embraced by Blair and his press team, who declared
that thanks to New Labour, "the good guys won." On May
12 Cook rejected calls for a public inquiry into the affair and
defended the Foreign Office from "wild allegations"
by Sandline. He said that no "prior approval" had been
given to a breach of the UN arms embargo. While denying that any
official backing was given to Sandline's activities, the government
is not denying that contact took place.
The Labour government calculates that, in the end, no one will
shed tears for the organisers of a coup that left a quarter of
a million people starving and drove tens of thousands into exile.
But Labour's supposedly humanitarian motives and claim to have
upheld democracy do not stand up to examination.
Imperialist plunder of Sierra Leone
The present tragedy of Sierre Leone is the end product of centuries
of imperialist oppression that have left a nation rich in natural
resources in the grip of grotesque poverty and internecine conflict.
Sierra Leone has a plentiful supply of diamonds, bauxite and other
minerals. Rex Diamond Mining Corporation, which owns the rights
to the area, says that the Tongo Fields are amongst the richest
in the world, with an estimated grade of $140 per ton.
In contrast, the country's people are amongst the world's poorest.
Out of a population of 5 million, 80 percent live below the poverty
line, and are unemployed or underemployed, earning less than $18
a month. Of these, 50 percent live in extreme poverty. Average
life expectancy is 34.4 years, compared with the overall figure
for Africa of 51.8. The death rate during childbirth is a staggering
1,800 per 100,000 live births.
Britain has interests in the area stretching back hundreds
of years. In 1896 it declared Sierra Leone a Protectorate in order
to block French domination of the region. It was not until April
27, 1961 that Sierre Leone was granted independence as a Commonwealth
nation. It has been ruled by corrupt governments--reflecting the
regional, religious and tribal antagonisms assiduously cultivated
by the British--and has suffered one coup after another.
In 1985, the regime of Joseph S. Momoh set out to abandon all
policies based on economic self-sufficiency and liberalise foreign
and domestic trade in order to attract overseas investment. But
the outbreak of civil war in the south, led by the Revolutionary
United Front (RUF) of Foday Sankoh, a British-trained army officer,
prevented this from being carried out. Momoh was overthrown in
a coup led by the British-trained Captain Valentine EM Strasser
in April 1992.
Britain urged Strasser to restore civilian rule in order to
stabilise a political and economic crisis that was crippling investment
and trade. Sierra Leone's Gross Domestic Product actually shrank
by 10 percent in 1995, under conditions where Africa's overall
economy grew by 2.9 percent.
By this time Sierre Leone had over 30,000 combatants in its
civil war and the army was consuming one-third of the national
budget. The main mining companies, Sierra Rutile and Sieromco,
had closed down their operations. The country's external debts
had risen to $1,226 million, more than 160 percent of Gross National
Product. Over 60 percent of food had to be imported, with much
of this coming as food-aid packages.
Strasser did not implement his promise to hold free elections
or bring about peace with the RUF, and was overthrown in January
1996. His replacement, Brigadier Julius Maade Bio, took power
shortly after finishing a "Management of Change" course
run by the British Civil Service, for which he was recommended
by the then-High Commissioner Ian McCluney.
Under Maade Bio the transfer of power to a civilian government,
led by the Sierra Leone People's Party, was organised in March
1996. Thus the Kabbah government owes not only its restoration,
but also its birth, to a coup. In November a peace agreement was
signed with the RUF, bringing the five-year civil war to an end.
Whatever the popular illusions in Kabbah's government, its
programme was dictated by the interests of the major international
corporations with trading links and investments in the country.
The government set out to create the conditions necessary to re-establish
mining and other ventures. In return for $139 million in loans
from the IMF, the government pledged to increase tax revenues,
cut the military budget, reduce government involvement in the
economy, rationalise legal requirements for foreign and domestic
investment, provide greater protection to economic operators and
deregulate the prices of petroleum products. Workers paid for
this pledge immediately, as fuel prices were hiked by 20 per cent.
A South African mercenary outfit, Executive Outcomes, employed
by the outgoing military regime, continued to receive over $1million
a month for protecting diamond mining assets. The diamond companies
resumed operations and, in the first months, reported mining stones
weighing as much as 550 carats.
The Kabbah government dealt ruthlessly with potential opponents.
It was involved in the arrest and internment of RUF leader Sakoh
by the Nigerian government. When this was criticised by one newspaper,
President Kabbah instigated a prosecution for its "unfriendly
line" towards Nigeria. The government proposed a bill to
regulate newspapers, demanding, amongst other things, ten years
experience and a degree in journalism for all editors. This would
have closed all but 8 of 46 newspapers in Freetown.
The biggest threat the government faced was from the army.
Any attempt to cut military spending would inevitably provoke
opposition. To offset this, the government cultivated a civilian
militia as an alternative power base. To ensure the loyalty of
at least a section of the army, Britain sent advisers to train
two battalions and Nigeria increased its contingent of trainers.
Kabbah announced that his government would slash the subsidised
rice provided to the army by two-thirds. This was a major attack
on its privileges. Army personnel received varying amounts of
rice depending on their rank. They only paid $1 a bag, compared
with the civilian price of $20. All of this laid the basis for
the May 25, 1997 coup that overthrew Kabbah, and the events that
followed.
In the service of the transnationals
The overriding aim of the Blair government and its counterparts
in Europe and America in placing Kabbah back in power is to restore
the stability necessary for economic restructuring and penetration
by the major transnational corporations. The Nigerian army and
mercenary outfits like Sandline International and Executive Outcomes
are mechanisms employed by the imperialist powers and their client
regimes to safeguard their global interests. In every corner of
the globe the major powers cultivate governments that are prepared
to defend the operations of the transnational corporations against
their own people or those in neighbouring countries. If these
regimes need assistance, then mercenaries can be brought in with
the tacit agreement of the major powers, rather than sending in
an occupation force. At least 10 such firms operate out of London,
with overseas contracts worth more than £100 million and
over 8,000 soldiers on their books.
Commenting on the lessons of Sierra Leone, David Shearer of
the International Institute of Strategic Studies told the Times
on May 9, "British foreign policy is being shaped more by
international corporate policy. Today's mercenaries don't fight
bush wars to win back countries, they just protect vital assets."
Millius Palayiwa, a Zimbabwean-born lawyer involved in the
Sierra Leone events, said, "[W]hen we talk about Executive
Outcomes and Sandline, we are not talking about the dogs of war
of the 1960s. They are very sophisticated. They have excellent
public relations, excellent intelligence. They are well trained
with sophisticated weapons. They operate as businesses.... (and)
are powerful enough to dislodge any government in Africa."
Blair's invocation of an "ethical foreign policy"
is every bit as hypocritical as the 19th century claims that Europeans
had assumed the "white man's burden" in their drive
to "civilise Africa." That he can dismiss the revelations
of the past month as "hoo-ha" only confirms that British
imperialism is again engaging in its traditional policy of lying
by day and murdering by night.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |