|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: Malaysia
Malaysia: Anwar's trial backfires on Mahathir
By Peter Symonds
10 November 1998
The trial of former Malaysian deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim
has only been under way one week and already the testimony of
the first prosecution witness--Police Special Branch Director
Mohamad Said Awang--has created a major political dilemma for
the government of Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.
The case concerns four of the ten charges against Anwar of
corruption and sexual misconduct. He is charged with having used
his political influence in August 1997 to interfere with a police
investigation into allegations brought by his former personal
driver Azizan Abu Bakar and by the sister of his private secretary
Ummi Hasilda Ali who said Anwar had sex with her brother's wife,
Shamsidar Taharin.
According to Said, Anwar had approached him to arrest Azizan
and Ummi and to force them to retract their statements. The special
branch director proceeded to tell the court of the police intelligence
unit's techniques for compelling witnesses to change their evidence
and even their stated political beliefs.
"Basically we do a quick assessment of our target, then
we see how the possibilities are to turn over their stand,"
he said, "If it is a certain political stand, we may neutralise
the stand if it is a security threat." He said it was known
as "a turning-over operation," but refused to provide
details of the threats, torture or other methods employed, saying
that it was "a great secret".
Said claimed that he had ordered his subordinates proceed even
though they had raised objections. When the first retractions
were not explicit enough, he demanded that new ones be written.
"I wanted it to be more committed. It was not clear enough.
I thought the letter was not good enough to be sent to the prime
minister. The sentence construction and the apology wasn't there,"
he said.
Under cross-examination by Anwar's lawyers, Said agreed that
if the allegations were false then Anwar would not have been wrong
to ask for a retraction. When questioned on his own role, he claimed
that he had felt under pressure to follow the orders of the then
deputy prime minister.
He was asked by a defence lawyer: "If someone higher than
the deputy prime minister were to instruct you to come and lie
to the court, would you do it?"
"Depends on the situation," Said replied.
At which point, High Court Judge Augustine Paul interjected:
"So you may lie?"
"I may or I may not," he said.
Anwar's lawyers backed the Special Branch chief further into
a corner when they forced him to admit that he had sent written
reports to Mahathir concerning the allegations against Anwar.
Having previously denied the existence of the documents, he then
had to produce his report written in August 1997.
"Through our sources, the allegations do not have, [or]
contain, any proof, and the sequence of events appears to be deliberately
created," he said, reading from the report.
"Apart from that, there are indications that there exists
a certain group that may have their own agenda and played a role
behind the scenes to urge Ummi and Azizan to smear Datuk Seri
Anwar Ibrahim."
Defence lawyers also questioned Said about a second report
dated September 3, 1997 which they claimed contained details of
the involvement of high profile political figures, including Mahathir's
close ally and businessman Daim Zainuddin who was appointed as
a special economic minister earlier this year. The prosecution
has been asked to produce this document in court.
Taken together Said's statements underline a fundamental contradiction
in the prosecution's case. Even if the charges against Anwar are
true then the obvious question arises: why did Mahathir and other
leading figures from the ruling United Malays National Organisation
(UMNO) go along with a conspiracy to intimidate and threaten witnesses
and cover up the truth? According to the police, allegations of
sexual misconduct first surfaced as far back as 1992.
If the claims were not true, why the sudden change of heart
by the police and the government? Anwar's defence read out newspaper
reports of comments made by Mahathir last year stating that he
believed that the allegations were false. The prime minister is
expected to be one of more than 50 prosecution witnesses to be
called in the case.
The police charges have all the hallmarks of a crude smear
campaign concocted by Mahathir and his political allies to justify
the sacking of Anwar and to block any discussion of the sharp
differences over economic policy which erupted within UMNO and
business circles as Malaysia plunged into recession.
Anwar was initially arrested without charge under the country's
Internal Security Act. He was only charged and put on trial after
protests both within Malaysia and criticisms from governments
both in South East Asia and internationally. Demonstrations in
support of Anwar and democratic reforms continued last weekend.
The government has had to suspend the trial during next week's
APEC summit in Kuala Lumpur. Canada, following the lead of the
US administration, will not engage in the traditional one-to-one
meetings with Mahathir as head of the host nation. Furthermore,
Mahathir's proposals for the regulation of currency speculators
and international capital markets are likely to come under fire
by the US in particular.
The trial of Anwar is not the first time that bitter factional
struggles within UMNO have been fought out through the medium
of sordid political scandals and the arbitrary use of the courts
and the ISA. In previous cases, Mahathir and previous UMNO leaders
have enjoyed the backing of international capital and the major
powers. Today the government is increasingly isolated. A protracted
court battle is likely to further erode Mahathir's base of support
and fuel divisions within the ruling elite.
See Also:
Deepening political crisis
in Malaysia
Behind the sacking and arrest of Anwar Ibrahim
[3 October 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |