|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : South
& Central America
Brazilian president prepares to implement IMF austerity package
By Jerry White
10 October, 1998
Brazilian President Fernando Henrique Cardoso, reelected October
4, is preparing to implement a package of austerity measures which
will cut health and pension protections, eliminate thousands of
civil servants' jobs and increase income taxes. Brazil's biggest
creditors, led by the US banks, are demanding the budget cuts
as a precondition for a $27 billion International Monetary Fund
loan.
Cardoso is also expected to maintain high interest rates--which
rose by 29 points in recent weeks to nearly 50 percent--to stabilize
the nation's currency, the real, and stem the flight of
capital from the country. In the aftermath of the Russian economic
crisis and the investment pullout from "emerging markets"
throughout the world, $750 million a day was leaving the country.
Brazil's foreign reserves neared levels of insolvency, falling
from $78 billion in July to $48 billion in September, while the
value of the real fell 40 percent.
These economic measures are expected to throw the country into
deep recession next year, worsening the conditions for the country's
30 million poor and throwing millions out of work. Anticipating
a further plunge in demand, Ford, Fiat and General Motors announced
20 percent production cuts last week, a move which will idle 50,000
auto workers. The jobless rate in Sao Paulo, the industrial and
financial center of the country, is already 19 percent.
US President Clinton and Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin aggressively
supported Cardoso's reelection, and then campaigned for the IMF
loan, because US banks and companies have $39 billion invested
in the country. Major banks like Citicorp and J.P. Morgan, holding
some $8.5 billion in Brazilian debt, are particularly exposed
to a possible default on repayments.
Voicing this concern the New York Times on October 7
editorialized, "Brazil's President, Fernando Henrique Cardoso,
has little time to savor his apparent first-round re-election
victory on Sunday. He must take rapid and unpopular steps to save
the economy." And to make the point even stronger, currency
traders and speculators pulled another $300 million out of Brazil,
leading to a 5 percent fall on the stock exchange the day after
the elections. The market fell another 180 points Thursday.
After speaking to Clinton Wednesday, Cardoso sought to reassure
the money markets that he would rapidly proceed to reduce the
country's $65 billion deficit no matter what the social costs.
"We need to have Brazil's fiscal situation changed by next
year. We will continue to advance with the reforms of the state....
I want to repeat that I am not willing to lose time and that we
will continue demanding fiscal sacrifices." In his speech
he promised to reveal his three-year austerity program, which
is expected to cut $25 billion from the budget, by October 20.
Election results
In the polling October 4 Cardoso received nearly 53 percent
of the vote, while his closest competitor, Luiz Inacio da Silva
(Lula) of the reformist PT (Partido dos Trabalhadores--Workers
Party), received 32 percent. Ciro Gomes, former finance minister
from the northeastern state of Ceara, got 11 percent, while Eneas
Carneiro, a nationalist who called for Brazil to build an atomic
bomb, received 2.2 percent. Though voting was obligatory, 30 percent
of the 106 million voters abstained or spoiled their ballots.
PT candidates had a stronger showing in statewide gubernatorial
elections, which means Cardoso's political allies will have to
face runoffs later this month, increasing his difficulty in pushing
through the austerity package. The five-party coalition that supported
da Silva's campaign said Monday that they would not support Cardoso's
package.
Cardoso was heavily promoted by big business and the news media
in Brazil, which either blacked out news of Lula's campaign, or
warned that his election would lead to economic collapse. The
PT charged the polling institutes, media and electoral officials
of conspiring "to influence public opinion and alter the
electoral will" by inflating Cardoso's lead in pre-election
polls.
Cardoso began his political career in the 1960s as a leftist
professor who was forced into exile under the military dictatorship
and then founded the Brazilian Social Democracy Party in 1988.
He has come full circle and established himself as a right-wing
champion of free market policies and a favorite of Wall Street.
As Minister of Finance under former President Itamar Franco,
Cardoso helped draft the "Real Plan" which he then implemented
in his first term in 1994. The plan, named after the country's
new currency, lured international investors by loosening currency
exchange controls, lowering tariff rates and opening up state-owned
telecommunications, electricity, gas, transportation, petroleum
and mining enterprises to private capital. In his first year in
office foreign direct investment doubled and Brazil soon became
one of the world's most attractive "emerging markets"
to global investors.
Cardoso has carefully avoided using the term "IMF package"
in his public appearances since the election. The IMF is universally
hated because of the suffering it imposed on the population during
the 1980s, and Cardoso fears that his allies will be defeated
in the next run-off, or even worse social upheavals will follow.
There are increasing signs of class conflict. Last July, thousands
of union members, students and landless peasants clashed with
police during a protest in Rio de Janeiro against the sale of
the state phone company, Telebras. The government dispatched 3,000
armed police to attack the demonstrators with bullets, tear gas
and batons.
Last spring hundreds of peasants organized in the Landless
Movement occupied government buildings in 10 state capitals to
press for government land reform. Over half of Brazil's arable
land, much of it uncultivated, is owned by only 2 percent of the
population. While a 1993 law allows expropriation of idle land,
powerful landlords have used security guards and military police
to massacre peasant squatters. Cardoso has given tacit support
to the violence by denouncing the land seizures.
The policies and record of the Workers Party
Despite widespread opposition to Cardoso's pro-business policies,
however, the Workers Party was incapable of rallying the support
of the working class and poor peasants. While the news media did
what it could to undermine support for the PT, it was the party's
policies and record which were more fundamentally responsible
for its defeat.
In the first election following the fall of the military junta
that came to power in a 1964 US-backed coup, Lula was narrowly
defeated by Fernando Collor de Mello. In 1994, despite enjoying
a large lead over Cardoso in early polls, Lula was defeated again.
During that campaign the PT candidate spent most of his time attempting
to convince Brazilian capitalists and foreign investors that their
interests would be protected under a PT regime. Lula traveled
to New York where he met with representatives of Wall Street's
banks and investment houses to assure them to have "no fear
to invest" in Brazil.
In the 1998 election campaign, Lula called for a series of
reformist measures, including a public works program to provide
jobs for the unemployed, the expansion of social programs and
an increase of the monthly minimum wage to nearly $1,000 from
$116 over the next few years. At the same time PT supporters said
a vote for Cardoso was a vote for the IMF and greater unemployment
and poverty.
Behind the reformist slogans, however, the PT advanced a program
of economic nationalism and collaboration with the Brazilian capitalists
against their foreign competitors. Lula called for the imposition
of currency and import controls to try to insulate Brazil from
global markets, similar to those measures imposed by Malaysia.
The PT also called for tariffs to protect Brazilian manufacturers
against foreign imports.
Such a program was incapable of rallying the support of many
workers who recognize how interconnected the Brazilian economy
is to the world market, and who remember the crisis of hyperinflation
in 1987 when Brazil defaulted on its foreign debt. At that time
workers saw the price of goods double before they could get their
paychecks home.
Moreover, many workers are familiar with the consequences of
these same policies as practiced by the country's trade unions.
Lula, as leader of the Metalworkers Union and the CUT trade union
federation, has collaborated with the transnational auto companies
to drive productivity up nearly 50 percent and eliminate thousands
of jobs. Rank-and-file opposition forced Lula to back down from
a plan to join Cardoso's "Forum for an industrial policy,"
and in March 7,000 Ford auto workers in Sao Paulo overwhelmingly
rejected the Metalworkers Union's proposal to lengthen the workday
without paying overtime.
Workers throughout Brazil have also had their experiences with
the PT candidates in office. In the 1994 elections the PT won
50 seats in the House of Representatives, five in the Senate and
two governorships. In addition they became the mayors of four
state capital cities, including Sao Paulo, and important working
class centers like Santos, Brazil's largest port, and Diadema
and Betim, the centers of the auto industry. Within weeks of their
election these PT officials sought to distance themselves from
the party's leftist image and worked to win the confidence of
the banks and corporations. The party's congressmen voted along
with the right-wing parties for privatization and other IMF-imposed
economic measures.
Lula is frequently referred to by the media as a "socialist"
and a left-wing "radical" and his campaign was backed
by a coalition of Stalinist and social democratic parties, some
trade unions and peasant organizations, as well as sections of
the Catholic Church. In the end, the PT's policies are aimed at
defending both Brazilian and international capital against a revolutionary
movement of the working class and rural masses.
In the past weeks general strikes have erupted in Ecuador and
Colombia against IMF dictated austerity measures. The economic
crisis hitting Brazil, already the country with the most unequal
distribution of wealth in South America, will lead to similar
explosions. None of the capitalist parties--free marketeers or
bourgeois nationalists--have any progressive solution to the economic
crisis. A new political road, based on socialist internationalism,
must be opened up.
See Also:
Latin
America's crisis spells social upheavals
[18 September 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |