|
WSWS : News
& Analysis : South
& Central America
The Wall Street Journal defends Pinochet
Comment by Jerry White
22 October, 1998
While many in the American media have hedged their responses
to the arrest of General Augusto Pinochet, the Wall Street
Journal on October 20 published a virtual brief for the former
Chilean military dictator, defending his long record of brutality
and political repression.
No one that follows the Wall Street Journal will be
surprised by this editorial's defense of the interests of American
big business and its rabid anticommunism. It is typical of the
newspaper's editorial page that the detention of Pinochet should
lead to a paroxysm of rage against Cuban President Fidel Castro,
with a headline, "Arrest Fidel!"
Nevertheless, the column should be noted because of the Journal's
unashamed support for the overthrow of a democratically-elected
government, and Pinochet's torture and execution of tens of thousands
of workers, youth and peasants. This editorial should be saved
for the record and referred to the next time the Wall Street
Journal denounces an insurgent movement of the working class
as an attack on "the rule of law."
The column makes nonsense of the claims that there is some
necessary connection between capitalism and democracy. On the
contrary, the Journal speaks for the most ruthless sections of
big business, which are prepared to dispense with their professed
concern for democratic rights and institutions whenever their
profits and property are seriously threatened.
The Journal makes the absurd charge that the bloodbath in Chile
was not the fault of Pinochet and his CIA backers, but of Castro,
Chilean President Salvador Allende and those who were murdered
by Pinochet and his henchmen. "His [Castro's] attempts to
spread revolution," the Journal says, "gave life to
the brutal military dictatorships that once marred the Latin scene."
The September 1973 coup led by Pinochet "saved his country."
The Journal justifies the overthrow of the government by implying
that Allende was not a legitimate president because he only received
a 36 percent plurality in 1970. But most American presidents,
including President Clinton, were elected by an even smaller percentage
of eligible voters. Does this mean that the Journal considers
them illegitimate and subject to military coups?
The newspaper makes it clear that Allende's greatest crime was,
under the pressure of a wave of strikes, factory occupations and
mass protests of urban and rural workers, carrying out policies
which threatened the interests of American multinationals like
Anaconda Copper and ITT, and the Wall Street banks.
The Journal praises Pinochet for transforming Chile from "a
Communist beachhead to an example of successful free-market reform"
which has inspired similar measures throughout the continent and
the developing world. In the coup's aftermath, property nationalized
under Allende was returned immediately to the foreign multinationals,
the right to strike and to union representation was abolished,
wage levels were cut in half and tens of thousands of jobs destroyed.
Indeed, this pattern of impoverishing the working class of which
the Wall Street Journal so highly approves has since been
imposed in many other countries.
The Journal claims that Pinochet's decision to step down proves
that he has left Chile a "free and prospering" democracy.
The general left power under the urging of sections of Chilean
big business, as well as his former US backers, who feared the
growing popular opposition to his dictatorship. Before leaving
office Pinochet imposed restrictions on the power of the civilian
government which guaranteed the military control of key institutions,
banned left-wing parties from elections and granted immunity to
all of those, including himself, who were implicated in criminal
acts during his dictatorship.
Police and military repression in Chile have not ended. On
the twenty-fifth anniversary of the coup last month heavily armed
police dispatched by Christian Democratic President Eduardo Frei
fired on protesters, killing two, and arrested hundreds of demonstrators
in Santiago. As for prosperity, more than 35 percent of the urban
and rural households in Chile are impoverished and the yearly
per capita income is little more than $3,000.
The Journal editorial concludes worriedly that Pinochet's arrest
might mean the world is beginning "a program of wholesale
revenge against dictators who drop their defenses." The newspaper
cites China's Stalinist leaders, Russian President Boris Yeltsin
and the South Korean generals--whose regimes have all served Wall
Street's interests--as other potential targets. Those the Journal
fails to include are the US accomplices of Pinochet, such as former
Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and the CIA officials and leaders
of corporate America who also have blood on their hands.
See Also:
US
played key role in 1973 Chilean coup: Can Henry Kissinger be extradited?
[21 October 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |