|
WSWS : Workers
Struggles : Australia
: The
Waterfront Dispute
Employers seek to smash conditions on Australian waterfront
By Terry Cook
12 February 1998
Backed and financed by Australia's major employers, the National
Farmers Federation (NFF) has launched a full-scale offensive at
Melbourne's Webb Dock in a bid to shatter working conditions on
the waterfront.
The Federation has spent millions of dollars on equipment and
an army of security guards and paramilitary thugs, supplied with
government riot shields, to break through picket lines. It is
setting up a scab training base at Webb Dock, in the middle of
Australia's busiest container port.
The dock has been leased out by Patrick's Stevedoring, one
of the country's two major waterfront firms, to a new NFF-sponsored
company, P&C Stevedoring. The operation's purpose is not to
run a stevedoring businessthe lease prohibits P&C from
handling international container cargo. Instead its function is
to train new recruits, including current and former military personnel,
so that employers can break strikes, inflict mass layoffs and
introduce casual labor and the abolition of overtime and penalty
rates.
In the February 9 edition of Business Review Weekly,
NFF industrial director James Ferguson, an executive of P&C
stevedoring, states that "commercial success" is not
"the main game" for P&C Stevedoring. "If in
a few months time, P&O [the other major stevedoring
company] and Patrick have improved their performances, then maybe
we can fold up our tents and go home."
According to the article: "The new breed of wharfie envisaged
by P&C Stevedores will sign individual contracts, work a 35-hour
week requested by the employer, receive an annualized salary and
forgo penalty rates."
The Webb Dock operation is the result of months of secret discussion
involving major companies and the Australian government. Workplace
Relations Minister Peter Reith and Patrick's Chairman Chris Corrigan
have admitted holding frequent talks since at least March 1997
about dismissing waterside workers en masse in the event of a
serious dispute.
However, they realized that mass layoffs were not possible
without skilled replacements. Sections of the employers set about
establishing a training facility at Dubai, in the United Arab
Emirates. However, they were forced to retreat amid a growing
scandal over their employment of active duty soldiers.
Corrigan and his backers then turned to Webb Dock. After months
of denying any role in the Dubai exercise, Corrigan has admitted
he was directly involved. And military personnel sent to Dubai
have resurfaced at Webb Dock.
Reith and Prime Minister John Howard continue to deny any government
connection with Dubai or Webb Dock, but military personnel could
not be used without official knowledge and consent. Moreover,
the Victorian state Liberal government headed by Jeff Kennett
supplied riot gear from the state's prisons to one of P&C's
hired security firms, the Australasian Security Group.
The media and union officials, as well as all the middle class
left groups, have portrayed the dispute as an attempt to break
the Maritime Union of Australiathe implication being that
the MUA acts to protect workers' jobs and conditions. In reality
the union has closely collaborated with the employers and both
Labor and Liberal governments to decimate the work force and drive
up productivity rates over the past two decades.
From nearly 27,000 at the end of 1953, the national waterside
work force has been cut to less than 5,000 today. Between 1989
and 1992 the MUA and the Australian Congress of Trade Unions (ACTU)
worked with the previous Labor government and the employers to
eliminate more than 5,000 jobs.
MUA officials are publicly appealing for that process to continue.
Writing in the Sydney Morning Herald soon after the dispute
erupted, MUA National Secretary John Coombs boasted of the union's
record under the 1989-92 Waterfront Industrial Reform Agreement:
"In fact the work force was halved, container crane handling
rates increased by 50 percent and net ship working rates by 64
percent; labor productivity for bulk handling went up 60 percent;
stevedoring costs for container handling went down by 29 percent
and container stevedoring charges were slashed by 24 percent."
Coombs argued that the union remained the best vehicle for
employers to achieve their requirements. "Reform was successful
because it was a cooperative process involving the Federal Government,
the stevedoring companies and the unions," he wrote.
However, driven by the impact of the economic meltdown in Asia,
the companies and the government have decided to impose further
drastic cuts in jobs and conditions, and they question the union's
ability to help impose such attacks.
In order to match cut-throat global competition, the stevedoring
employers, urged on by other sections of big business, require
the removal of all remaining restrictions on the operation of
cranes and other equipment, 24 hours a day at the cheapest rates.
After negotiations between the union and the Howard government
broke down last December, Reith said a union was needed "that
was not only willing to encourage reform, but also had the capacity
to deliver on reform, which is a bit of a question mark for these
guys."
The companies and the government increasingly drew the conclusion
that a frontal assault was needed to smash waterside workers'
conditions because of resistance by the workers, not the union.
Patrick's workers in Melbourne rejected a union-management
agreement to impose major changes to their rosters. Workers only
grudgingly accepted the changes after the Industrial Relations
Commission handed down an order preventing industrial action.
The union has bent over backwards to prove its value to the
employers. Within hours of the current dispute erupting, Coombs
publicly assured waterfront employers that the union would cause
"as little disturbance to trade as possible."
The MUA has refused to call for support from other sections
of the working class or even call out its own membership. MUA
members continue to work at other Patrick's docks and the company
has been permitted to divert ships to P&O wharves. Hundreds
of Toyota vehicles were moved to a P&O facility to be loaded
by union labor.
The union has restricted pickets to allow the NFF to bring
in giant cranes, forklifts and other equipment. When one worker
allegedly threw a stone at a van carrying security guards, the
union condemned him and vowed to take disciplinary action, including
expulsion from the union.
To justify their role in isolating the Webb Dock workers, ACTU
and MUA bureaucrats have pointed to the threat of massive fines,
damages and jail terms under the Howard government's Workplace
Relations Act. But that legislation did not fall from the sky.
The Liberals were only able to introduce it in 1996 because the
unions attacked workers for opposing it outside parliament house,
strangled all opposition and joined the government in backroom
talks. In fact, Democrats leader and now Labor star recruit, Cheryl
Kernot, was the chief architect of the legislation's final draft,
backed by ACTU President George and other union leaders.
While blocking any industrial movement within Australia, the
MUA and ACTU have urged dockworkers to rely on the International
Transport Workers Federation to counter the present assault. The
ITWF also promised international backing for the protracted Liverpool
dockers' strike, but did nothing to assist them. After isolating
the British dockers for nearly two years, the unions officially
called off the dispute last month.
The NFF has a long history of heading up strategic attacks
on the working class. Its leading figures, including P&C Director
Paul Houlihan, were centrally involved in the mid-1980s operations
against meat workers at Mudginberri in the Northern Territory
and confectionery workers at Dollar Sweets in Melbourne.
The ACTU isolated those workers, creating the conditions for
their defeat and the imposition of crippling legal damages. Led
by today's Labor leaders, Simon Crean and Martin Ferguson, as
well as Bill Kelty and Jennie George, the ACTU then adopted the
program of "award restructuring" to meet the demands
of the employers for the destruction of hard-won conditions in
every industry.
With the full support of the MUA leaders, the ACTU later went
on to introduce "enterprise bargaining" to further sacrifice
conditions to the corporate-government drive for "international
competitiveness."
If the MUA and ACTU leaders are allowed to create the conditions
for a similar defeat at Webb Dockone of the largest and
traditionally most militant areas of the waterfrontit will
strengthen the employers in mounting a new wave of attacks on
every front.
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |