|
WSWS : Workers
Struggles : Europe
Remaining 9,000 British miners' jobs under threat
By Jean Shaoul
21 July 1998
The future of 9,000 remaining coal miners is still in doubt.
Changes in the regulation of the privatised electricity industry
and a regeneration fund for the former coal communities recently
announced by the Labour government will not secure their livelihoods.
The government aims to defend Britain's national interests, drive
down wages and conditions in the mines and use the former coal
communities as the basis for new sweatshop factories. The jobs
of gas workers are also threatened by the proposals.
The decision to intervene in the trading relations between
the coal and electricity industries followed a government review
of the energy sector. This was prompted by last April's expiry
of power station contracts that required the generators to buy
30 million tonnes of British coal annually, at above world market
prices. RJB Mining, which bought the pits from the former state-owned
British Coal in 1994, faced the prospect of closing mines and
making most of the last 9,000 miners redundant if these contracts
were not renewed.
A campaign to advocate government action was launched by the
Trade Union Congress, Leeds University and the Coalfield Communities.
The "economic" case for coal it advocated was based
on the nationalist argument that an increased dependence on gas
and oil would make Britain reliant on imported energy as North
Sea oil runs out.
The government's response was to provide some minimal assistance
to the coal industry in the short term, while insisting it become
internationally competitive. A blanket five-year ban on new gas-fired
power stations was abandoned after the intervention of Prime Minister
Blair. All that was offered was a "presumption against granting
consent" for gas-powered electricity generators in England
for a limited period. The power generators will
also be required to sell off their coal-fired power stations,
thereby reducing their monopoly of power.
In return for these favourable trading arrangements, the government
told the coal employers to cut jobs, wages and conditions. It
stressed, "There is no deal between the Government and the
generators to get them to buy British coal. Purchasing decisions
are a matter for the generators."
The only measure advanced to address the devastating social
impact of the collapse of mining is the establishment of a "regeneration"
fund to help the affected communities. This is, in reality, a
subsidy to industry in the form of tax breaks to encourage low-cost
assemblers to move in and exploit redundant miners and their families.
One of the leaders of the pro-coal lobby was Mick Clapham,
a former policy advisor to the National Union of Mineworkers and
Labour MP for Barnsley West and Penistone. Clapham became a hate-figure
amongst miners when he sat on the Tory government's all-party
committee that endorsed the closure of 31 pits in 1992. In an
attempt to rehabilitate both himself and his party, Clapham claimed
that the proposals showed New Labour's "third way" can
reconcile the dictates of the market with saving jobs. "Maybe
now we are focused a little bit more on the Labour heartlands,
because it is politically important, this decision on coal,"
he said.
The fate of the coal industry under the Blair government shows
the opposite. When the Labour government nationalised coal in
1947, the industry employed 750,000 people at 1,000 deep mines
and produced 186 million tonnes a year.
From the late 1950s, there were constant closures and job shedding
as demand from the steel and railway industries and domestic consumers
declined. In the 1960s, one pit a week closed under the Labour
government. From 1960-92, output halved to 90 million tonnes and
employment fell to 50,000. Closures were concentrated on low productivity,
high labour-cost pits.
The scale of the social tragedy this has produced can be seen
from just a few statistics:
- South Yorkshire, at the heart of the English coal fields,
has a GDP of less than 75 percent of the European average--the
lowest of any UK region and falling.
- The real rate of unemployment in the mining communities is
more than 20 percent.
- In a recent study, as many as 40 percent of pit village households
had no wage earner.
- Eighteen months after a pit closure, those who had found
work had taken a drop in take-home pay of £70 a week.
The coal crisis has its origins in the developing global market
for energy. The British coal industry was deliberately isolated
from the world market after it was taken into state ownership
in 1947. It was developed as part of a nationally-based strategy
linking it to the domestic production of power. Growth in world
trade, "liberalisation" and deregulation of national
markets sounded the death knell for coal.
Nationalisation could only provide a stay of execution for
British Coal. The bankrupt industry was saddled with an impossible
financial regime. The National Coal Board (NCB) was burdened with
a huge debt due to the very generous compensation paid to the
old mine owners. It never recovered from this legacy. Successive
governments also compelled the NCB to finance its capital investment
with loans rather than government grants. Despite this, NCB always
made an operating profit. Under the 1979 Tory government, the
NCB had to make a much higher rate of return than the private
sector.
However much the miners increased productivity and accepted
"sacrifices", it was never enough. Interest charges
always wiped out the surplus. Between 1979 and 1992 the total
operating profit was £2.6 billion, but interest charges
amounted to £4.7 billion.
The development of high-tech "super pits" further
increased the debt. The power stations, which had become the NCB's
main customers, demanded low-cost coal. By 1980, coal supplied
to them by the NCB had risen to 88 million tonnes, from 32 million
tonnes in 1950.
The defeat of the miners following their year-long strike in
1984-85 and the closure of the smaller peripheral pits was absolutely
crucial to the government's overall energy policy. New sources
of private profit were to be realised through liberalising electricity
generation/distribution and privatising the state-owned gas, coal,
oil and nuclear energy enterprises. The government also sought
to free electricity from dependency on coal and open up the North
Sea to the oil companies for gas exploration.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, two new forces destabilised
the link between coal and electricity: competition and the regulation
of electricity prices. Competition brought in new products and
producers with much lower labour costs. South African and Australian
strip-mined coal had a lower physical labour content; Polish and
Colombian deep-mined coal had much lower hourly labour costs.
Oil and gas were liquid fuels that could be raised from the ground
and moved more cheaply. Their prices had dropped after the 1970s
oil crises.
The electricity market was opened up to competition and the
generators lost their total domination of the market. The distributors
preferred to build gas- rather than coal-fired power stations
as it freed them from the grip of the monopoly generators, National
Power and Powergen. It was also cleaner, saving on pollution costs,
and slightly cheaper.
By 1992 it was clear that most of the coal industry faced closure.
The gas-fired power stations in operation or under construction
were set to displace 30 million tonnes of coal, reducing British
Coal's share of electricity supply from 60 to 30 percent.
In 1994, the Conservative government sold off what remained
of the coal industry to RJB Mining. It was a bargain sale as the
state retained the debts and all the liabilities of the industry
for ill-health, subsidence and environmental damage. RJB calculated
that it could make more than enough profits to cover the cost
of buying the pits out of the contracts with the electricity generators
before their expiry in 1997-98.
The continued growth in the international trade in coal and
other fuels meant the generators refused to renew the contracts
with RJB. This threatens the total annihilation of coal mining,
precipitating the present crisis.
See Also:
Wage restraint
and privatisation from British Labour government
[17 July 1998]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |