|
WSWS : Workers
Struggles : North
America : GM
Strike
UAW convention opens as impact of GM strike widens
By Jerry White
23 June 1998
The United Auto Workers national convention opened Monday as
the strikes at two General Motors parts plants in Flint, Michigan
reduced the automaker's North American output by 95 percent. The
strikes by 9,200 workers began June 5 at the Flint Metal Center
stamping plant and June 11 at Delphi Flint East, which makes sparkplugs,
engine parts and instrument clusters.
The walkouts have led to the shutdown or slowdown of production
at 24 of GM's 32 North American assembly plants, idling 121,500
workers. Thousands more have been laid off at 100 GM-owned and
independent parts plants in the US, Mexico Canada and Singapore.
The strikes are costing GM about $75 million a day in lost
production. If the walkouts continue into mid-August, the after-tax
losses on second- and third-quarter profits could total more than
$2 billion.
Indications are that the automaker is willing to take a long
strike. GM management and Wall Street investors are seeking to
carry out the cost-cutting measures which have to a great extent
already been imposed by GM's US rivals.
On Monday, UAW officials hinted there might be further local
strikes. Negotiations are taking place at Flint's Buick City plant,
which the company has pegged for closure next year, as well as
at a brake plant in Dayton, Ohio and a stamping plant in Indianapolis,
Indiana.
In his keynote address to the union's thirty-second constitutional
convention, held in Las Vegas, UAW President Stephen Yokich declared
the union would "last one day longer than GM." However
his speech made clear that the union leadership does not, in principle,
oppose the company's cost-cutting drive.
Yokich rejected GM's claim that the Flint strike arose from
the company's need to become leaner and more competitive. Implicitly
accepting this goal, the company's basic premise for downsizing,
Yokich centered his attack on charges that GM had violated its
agreement to invest in plants where the union cooperated in tearing
up work rules and increasing productivity.
Yokich and other UAW officials cited the union's relations
with Ford and Chrysler as a model of labor-management cooperation.
UAW Vice-President Richard Shoemaker, who heads the union's GM
department, told reporters, "The other two companies, once
they enter into an agreement with us, they keep it. Each one of
the companies is constantly striving to improve its competitiveness,
and we understand that."
It is highly significant that the union officials point favorably
to Ford and Chrysler, since the two automakers have cut their
work forces in half since 1978, eliminating 141,000 jobs. In essence,
the union officials are appealing to GM to work with the UAW to
cut labor costs. Such a policy reflects the interests not of rank-and-file
workers, but rather an attempt to defend the privileges of the
union bureaucracy.
The hypocrisy of the UAW officials was underscored by the variety
of multimedia exhibits dedicated to UAW-GM cooperation on display
at the union convention. As the Wall Street Journal reported,
"The display includes larger-than-life sketches of the faces
of Richard Shoemaker ... and his GM counterpart, Vice President
Gerald Knechtel. Between the sketches, a television screen features
videos in which they speak of cooperation and how working together
will help GM meet its goal of becoming more competitive. Near
the multimedia stand, workers were testing laser lights that beamed
UAW and GM logos on the floor."
The feelings of workers on the picket lines in Flint were very
different. A striker at the Delphi Flint East complex told the
World Socialist Web Site, "This 'jointness' process has failed.
That's why we are here carrying these picket signs. They've had
us fooled with that for years. Back in the 1970s I was one of
those workers who were smashing Toyotas in the parking lot. Management
and the union told us the Japanese were our enemies and that we
had to join with GM to fight them. Now we are making parts for
Japanese automakers and I don't feel that way anymore.
"But the UAW officials have never repudiated their policy
and I never expect them to do so. In fact, they don't even want
us talking to reporters on the picket line, especially if we have
something bad to say about the UAW International."
Another worker with 33 years at the Flint Metal Center added,
"Back in the 1930s when the workers carried out the sit-down
strikes, the union had some power. Then in the 1970s they got
in bed with management with this 'partnership' stuff. The union
got weaker and now we have to fight again. The union leaders were
more concerned with their careers than with the jobs and concerns
of the members.
"GM and these other big companies think they are in the
driver's seat. They are abusing workers and just looking for the
big dollars. That is why we are out here fighting."
See Also:
Global changes in auto industry underlie
struggle over jobs
[16 June 1998]
The merger
between Chrysler and Daimler-Benz:
what it means for workers
[8 May 1998]
The Significance
and Implications of Globalisation
- A Lecture by Nick Beams
[4 January 1998 - Full text of lecture 115KB]
Marxism and the
Trade Unions
- A lecture by David North
[10 January 1998 - Full text of lecture 100KB]
Top of page
The WSWS invites your comments.
Copyright 1998-2008
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved |